Journals / Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Role of the Tympanometric Gradient and Acoustic Reflex on Prognosis of Otitis Media With Effusion

Pages
30–33
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, these 2 tympanometric quantitative measurements are beneficial for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with OME.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND/AIMS Otitis media with effusion (OME) is a major health issue worldwide.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIAL and METHODS Based on the tympanic membrane findings, participants were divided into 2 groups: (A) minimal retraction group and (B) normal group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, these 2 tympanometric quantitative measurements are beneficial for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with OME.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

BACKGROUND/AIMS Otitis media with effusion (OME) is a major health issue worldwide. Although it is difficult to consider any quantitative measurement in particular to be a herald of clinical recovery in OME, this study aimed to determine the role of tympanometric quantitative values, especially gradient (GR) and acoustic reflex (AR), in patients with OME who are approaching the full healing stage. MATERIAL and METHODS Based on the tympanic membrane findings, participants were divided into 2 groups: (A) minimal retraction group and (B) normal group. For each group, the tympanometric quantitative measurements (static compliance [SC], tympanometric peak pressure [TPP], GR, and AR) were obtained and compared statistically. In addition, the relationship of AR with tympanometric quantitative measurements was compared statistically. RESULTS The mean GR values in group A (n=66) and group B (n=73) were 157.06±92.85 daPa and 103.60±28.51 daPa, respectively (P=.001). Although no significant difference was found with respect to AR, statistically significant differences were observed with respect to TPP between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION In contrast to AR, GR and TPP values were consistent with the examination findings of the tympanic membrane observed in patients with resolved OME progressing to the full healing stage. Thus, these 2 tympanometric quantitative measurements are beneficial for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with OME.

🔖

Cite This Article

SUSAMAN, N., ÇETİNER, H. (2021). Role of the Tympanometric Gradient and Acoustic Reflex on Prognosis of Otitis Media With Effusion. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 30–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/413618

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Karma PH, Penttila MA, Sipila MM, Kataja MJ. Otoscopic diagnosis of middle ear effusion in acute and non-acute otitis media. I. the value of different otoscopic findings. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1989
  2. 17(1): 37-49. [Crossref] 2. Paradise JL, Rockette HE, Colborn DK, Bernard BS, Smith CG, Kurs-LAsky M, et al. Otitis media in 2253 Pittsburgh-area infants: prevalence and risk factors during the first two years of life. Pediatrics 1997
  3. 99(3): 318-33. [Crossref] 3. Rosenfeld RM, Culpepper L, Doyle KJ, Grundfast KM, Hoberman A, Kenna MA, et al. Clinical practice guideline: otitis media with effusion. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004
  4. [Crossref] 4. Palmu A, Puhakka H, Rahko T, Takala AK. Diagnostic value of tympanometry in infants in clinical practice. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1999
  5. 49(3): 207-13. [Crossref] 5. Campbell CMK, Peck JE. Audiology. Lee KJ, Chan Y, Das S. editors. Essential Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. USA: McGraw Hill
  6. p.24-67. 6. Fowler CG, Shanks JE. Tympanometry. Katz J. editor. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
  7. Barr GD. A Working classification of retraction for the whole tympanic membrane. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013
  8. [Crossref] 8. Gurgel RK, Jackler RK, Dobie RA, Popelka GR. A new standardized format for reporting hearing outcomes in clinical trials. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012
  9. 147(5): 803-7. [Crossref] 9. Rosenfeld RM, Shin JJ, Schwartz SR, Coggins R, Gagnon L, Hackell JM, et al. Clinical practice guideline: Otitis media with effusion (Update). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016
  10. 154(2): 201-14. [Crossref] 10. Margolis RH, Hunter LL. Acoustic immittance measurements. RJ Roeser, M Valente, H Hosford-Dunn. editors. Audiology Diagnosis. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers
  11. p.381-423. 11. Margolis RH, Shanks JE. Tympanometry. Katz J. Editor. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins
  12. p.438-75. 12. Duzer S, Sakallioglu O, Akyigit A, Polat C, Cetiner H, Susaman N. Values range of tympanometric gradient in otitis media with effusion. J Craniofac Surg 2017
  13. 28(3): 283-6. [Crossref] 13. Nozza RJ, Bluestone CD, Kardatze D, Bachman R. Towards the validation of aural acoustic immittance measures for diagnosis of middle ear effusion in children. Ear Hear 1992
  14. 13(6): 442-53. [Crossref] 14. Nozza RJ, Bluestone CD, Kardatze D, Bachman R. Identification of middle ear effusion by aural acoustic immitta