Journals / Research on Engineering Structures and Materials / 2021 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

London the Shard analysis in the context of parametric and sustainable skyscraper design

Pages
661–675
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition to the norms and regulations of supertall design principles, all risk scenarios of wind, under the effect of velocity and pressure need to be simulated before safe construction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, London The Shard skyscraper structure was examined under the concepts of sustainability and wind engineering dynamics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The skyscraper model 1-1 was created in its original form and simulated under real wind data at its location in London.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition to the norms and regulations of supertall design principles, all risk scenarios of wind, under the effect of velocity and pressure need to be simulated before safe construction.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

In this study, London The Shard skyscraper structure was examined under the concepts of sustainability and wind engineering dynamics. The aerodynamic examination of the building in accordance with the wind dynamics principles and the relevant CFD simulations as proof, created. In the simulations carried out in the Matlab CFD environment, the Navier Stokes equation principles with komega turbulance model were followed. The skyscraper model 1-1 was created in its original form and simulated under real wind data at its location in London. In the results obtained after the simulations, the velocity increased by V-3V in the first 600-800 meters distance range, in the x direction of the model, created a vortex around the structure. While the speed-vortex effects mechanisms were examined on the model by V-3V, the pressure load P within the first 25 meters in the z direction (structure height) of the model was reached to 5P, up to the limit of 280-300 meters. When it is reached to 300 meters height, a 5-fold increase in pressure was detected. In the x-direction, pressure change of the model tested. The variation of the pressure load at the rate of P - 2P was determined in the first 800-1000 meters of the model in the x-direction, and the pressure exerts a double effect in the first 800-1000 meters of the model. In addition to the norms and regulations of supertall design principles, all risk scenarios of wind, under the effect of velocity and pressure need to be simulated before safe construction.

🔖

Cite This Article

SUNGUR, Ş. E., ARPACIOĞLU, Ü., ÖZGÜNLER, M. (2021). London the Shard analysis in the context of parametric and sustainable skyscraper design. Research on Engineering Structures and Materials, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 661–675. https://ajindex.com/articles/413556

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Cilento K. Renzo Piano- The Shard. 2012; 1–13. Available from:
  2. Maier F. LEAF Awards 2013 Overall Winner: Marsan Mediatheque in France. Detail, September 2013. [3] Šenk P. The Plug-In Concept: Technology and Aesthetics of Change. Architecture and Research, 2013/1: 42-51;
  3. Hobson B. Archigram’s Plug-In City shows that “pre- fabrication doesn’t have to be boring”. Dezeen, 2020;(373):1–18
  4. Hobson B, Cook AP. Next story Follow: Archigram ’ s Instant City concept enables " a village to become a kind of city for a week ". Dezeen, 2020;5:1–11 [6] Mawer R, Parker J. Engineering the Shard. Eng J. Irl [Internet]. 2016;20(384):3–5. Available from:
  5. Brown L. Anatomy of a Skyscraper. University of Kansas USA, 1ST edition; 2018 [8] Press Association. 23 Facts about the Shard. Guardian. 2012;16:1–2 [9] Bogomil E. Burj Khalifa, The Shard and Rivals. Univ Cambridge, Newnham Coll. 2009;(March 2012):2–9 [10] Gibson T. This Tech-Company is Building Photorealistic Models of Cities Around the World. 2021;(July
  6. Irwin PA. Wind engineering challenges of the new generation of super-tall buildings. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 2009;97(7–8):328–34.
  7. Irwin BPA. Wind Engineering. Wind Eng. 2006;(June):1–4
  8. Irwin P. Thought leadership. RWDI. 2018
  9. Nerberg S. Why this Ontario engineering firm is the go-to for starchitects designing the world ’ s supertall towers. 2019;3