Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2021 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1

Ablative options for prostate cancer management

Pages
S49–S55
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Long-term oncological outcomes of primary and salvage options are required to endorse it among the standard treatments.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This review provides an overview of the available ablative options for prostate cancer (PCa) management.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A second ablation after disease recurrence has demonstrated low toxicity, and future studies must define its potential to avoid radical treatments.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Long-term oncological outcomes of primary and salvage options are required to endorse it among the standard treatments.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This review provides an overview of the available ablative options for prostate cancer (PCa) management. It contemplates the ablative concepts and the role of prostate ablation in different settings, from primary treatment to repeat ablation, and as an alternative to radiorecurrent disease. Improvements in prostate imaging have allowed us to ablate prostate lesions through thermal, mechanical, and vascular-targeted sources of energy. Partial gland ablation (PGA) has an emerging role in the management of localized PCa because toxicity outcomes have been proven less harmful compared with whole-gland treatments. Although longterm oncological outcomes are yet to be consolidated in comparative studies, recent large series and prospective studies in PGA have reported encouraging results. A second ablation after disease recurrence has demonstrated low toxicity, and future studies must define its potential to avoid radical treatments. PGA is an attractive option for PCa management in different scenarios because of its low-toxicity profile. As expected, recurrence rates are higher than those seen in whole-gland procedures. Long-term oncological outcomes of primary and salvage options are required to endorse it among the standard treatments.

🔖

Cite This Article

BARBOSA, R. R. T., BATISTA, L. T., CATHELINEAU, X., MACIAS, J. S., SALAS, R. S. (2021). Ablative options for prostate cancer management. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1, S49–S55. https://ajindex.com/articles/413248

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Linares-Espinós E, Carneiro A, Martínez-Salamanca JI, Bianco F, Castro-Alfaro A, Cathelineau X, et al. New technologies and techniques for prostate cancer focal therapy. Minerva Urol e Nefrol 2018;70:252-63
  2. Ahmed HU, Bosaily AE, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer ( PROMIS ): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 2017;6736:1-8. [Crossref] 3. Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, Panebianco V, Mynderse LA, Vaarala MH, et al. MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for ProstateCancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med 2018;378:1767–77. [Crossref] 4. Lodeizen O, de Bruin M, Eggener S, Crouzet S, Ghai S, Varkarakis I, et al. Ablation energies for focal treatment of prostate cancer. World J Urol 2019;37:409-18. [Crossref] 5. Valerio M, Cerantola Y, Eggener SE, Lepor H, Polascik TJ, Villers A, et al. New and Established Technology in Focal Ablation of the Prostate: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol 2017;71:17-34. [Crossref] 6. Tourinho-barbosa RR, de la Rosette J, Sanchez-Salas R. Prostate cancer multifocality, the index lesion, and the microenvironment. Curr Opin Urol 2018;28:499-505. [Crossref] 7. Ahmed HU. The Index Lesion and the Origin of Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1704-6. [Crossref] 8. Liu W, Laitinen S, Khan S, Vihinen M, Kowalski J, Yu G, et al. Copy number analysis indicates monoclonal origin of lethal metastatic prostate cancer. Nature Med 2009;15:559-65. [Crossref] 9. Gundem G, Van Loo P, Kremeyer B, Alexandrov LB, Tubio JMC, Papaemmanuil E, et al. The evolutionary history of lethal metastatic prostate cancer. Nature 2015;520:353-7. [Crossref] 10. Hegde JV, Margolis DJ, Wang PC, Reiter RE, Huang J, Steinberg ML, et al. Establishing the distribution of satellite lesions in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: implications for focused radiotherapy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2017;20:241-8. [Crossref] 11. Priester A, Natarajan S, Khoshnoodi P, Margolis DJ, Raman SS, Reiter RE, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Underestimation of Prostate Cancer Geometry: Use of Patient Specific Molds to Correlate Images with Whole Mount Pathology. J Urol 2017;197:320- 6. [Crossref] 12. Rouvière O, Puech P, Renard-Penna R, Claudon M, Roy C, MègeLechevallier F, et al. Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol 2019;20:100-9