Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2022 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 3

Mirabegron as a Medical Expulsive Therapy for 5-10 mm Distal Ureteral Stones: A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study

Pages
209–214
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In multivariate analysis, only medical expulsive therapy (P < .001) and stone size (P < .001) were independent predictors of stone expulsion rate.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of mirabegron as a medical expulsive therapy in patients with distal ureteral stones of 5-10 mm size.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and methods: A prospective, comparative study included 96 patients with radiopaque distal ure- teral stones of 5-10 mm who were randomly allocated and treated by medical expulsive therapy in 2 groups from January 2019 to December 2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In multivariate analysis, only medical expulsive therapy (P < .001) and stone size (P < .001) were independent predictors of stone expulsion rate.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of mirabegron as a medical expulsive therapy in patients with distal ureteral stones of 5-10 mm size. Material and methods: A prospective, comparative study included 96 patients with radiopaque distal ure- teral stones of 5-10 mm who were randomly allocated and treated by medical expulsive therapy in 2 groups from January 2019 to December 2020. Patients in group A received only ketorolac 30 mg/day for 5 days, then on demand. Patients in group B received mirabegron 50 mg/day for 4 weeks plus ketorolac 30 mg/day like in group A. The stone expulsion rate was the primary outcome. Results: There were no significant differences regarding age, gender, body mass index, laterality, degree of hydronephrosis, and stone size. After 4 weeks, stone expulsion rate was 52.1% for group A versus 89.6% for group B (P < .001). The median (range) of time to stone expulsion was 14 (13-23) and 7 (3-16) days for groups A and B, respectively (P = .004). The medians (range; interquartile range) of episodes of renal pain (1 (0-2; 1) vs. (0-2; 2); P < .001) and extra analgesic ampoules (1 (0-7; 4) vs. 0 (0-2; 0) vials; P < .001) were significantly higher in group A than those in group B, respectively. In multivariate analysis, only medical expulsive therapy (P < .001) and stone size (P < .001) were independent predictors of stone expulsion rate. Conclusion: Mirabegr

🔖

Cite This Article

SAYED, M. A., MOEEN, A. M., SAADA, H., NASSİR, A., TAYİB, A., GADELKAREEM, R. A. (2022). Mirabegron as a Medical Expulsive Therapy for 5-10 mm Distal Ureteral Stones: A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 3, 209–214. https://ajindex.com/articles/413228

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ahmed AF, Al-Sayed AY. Tamsulosin versus alfuzosin in the treat- ment of patients with distal ureteral stones: prospective, rand- omized, comparative study. Korean J Urol. 2010
  2. 51(3):193-197. [CrossRef] 2. Ongün Ş, Dursun M. The effect of distal ureteral stone size meas- urements on spontaneous passage. J Urol Surg. 2019
  3. 6(2):139- 143. [CrossRef] 3. De Coninck V, Antonelli J, Chew B, Patterson JM, Skolarikos A, Bultitude M. Medical expulsive therapy for urinary stones: future trends and knowledge gaps. Eur Urol. 2019
  4. 76(5):658-666. [CrossRef] 4. Tang QL, Wang DJ, Zhou S, Tao RZ. Mirabegron in medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: a prospective, rand- omized, controlled study. World J Urol. 2021
  5. 39(12):4465-4470. [CrossRef 5. Hollingsworth JM, Rogers MA, Kaufman SR, et al. Medical ther- apy to facilitate urinary stone passage: a meta – analysis. Lancet. 2006
  6. 368(9542):1171-1179. [CrossRef] 6. Tao RZ, Qin ZQ, Liu FD, Lv JL. Efficacy and safety of tamsulosin in the medical expulsion therapy for distal ureteral calculi: a sys- tematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Urol J. 2019
  7. 16(3):224-231. [CrossRef] 7. Wang H, Man LB, Huang GL, Li GZ, Wang JW. Comparative effi- cacy of tamsulosin versus nifedipine for distal ureteral calculi: a meta-analysis. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Palmisano F, Spinelli MG, Luzzago S, et al. Medical expulsive therapy for symptomatic distal ureter stones: is the combination of Bromelain and tamsulosin more effective than tamsulosin alone? Preliminary results of a single-center study. Urol Int. 2019
  9. 102(2):145-152. [CrossRef] 9. Bahadur Kc H, Shrestha A, Acharya GB, Basnet RB, Shah AK, Shrestha PM. Tamsulin versus tadalfil as a medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: a prospective randomized study. Invest Clin Urol. 2016
  10. Porpiglia F, Vaccino D, Billia M, et al. Corticosteroids and tamsu- losin in the medical expulsive therapy for symptomatic distal ure- ter stones: single drug or association? Eur Urol. 2006
  11. 50(2):339-344. [CrossRef] 11. Urkmez A, Tokuc E, Topaktas R, Sahin A, Yuksel OH. Mirabegron: a novel and promising medical expulsive treatment for ureteral stones? J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019
  12. 29(1):73-74. [CrossRef] 12. Solakhan M, Bayrak O, Bulut E. Efficacy of mirabegron in medi- cal expulsive therapy. Urolithiasis. 2019
  13. 47(3):303-307. [CrossRef] 13. Chatterjee S, Jalan V, Pal DK. An observational study on the effi- cacy of mirab