Journals / Turkish Journal of Hematology / 2001 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

Clinical, immunophenotypic and cytogenetic features of megakaryocytic blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia: A single institution study

Pages
107–115
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Normal or elevated platelet count (med. 427.4 x 109/L) in BC of CML with prominent expression of CD34 and CD61 antigens, and significant myelofibrosis (grade IV) are the most consistent clinical findings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We present 15 patients with megakaryocytic (Mk) blast crisis (BC) of a Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome positive CML confirmed by immunophenotype analysis between 1989-2000.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All patients had significant expression of CD61 (14/14) and CD34 (13/13) antigens, and a high frequency of expression of CD13 (9/12), CD33 (10/12) and CD11b (9/11).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Normal or elevated platelet count (med. 427.4 x 109/L) in BC of CML with prominent expression of CD34 and CD61 antigens, and significant myelofibrosis (grade IV) are the most consistent clinical findings.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Trombosit sayısı · Antijenler · CD34

Özet

We present 15 patients with megakaryocytic (Mk) blast crisis (BC) of a Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome positive CML confirmed by immunophenotype analysis between 1989-2000. The primary aim of this study is to define clinical, immunological, cytogenetic and laboratory characteristics of Mk BC in Ph positive CML. We have done retrospective analysis regarding basic clinical findings, immunologic phenotype, cytogenetic studies and platelet functions. All patients had significant expression of CD61 (14/14) and CD34 (13/13) antigens, and a high frequency of expression of CD13 (9/12), CD33 (10/12) and CD11b (9/11). The BC in 6/15 patients was presented with thrombocytosis, 7/15 had a normal platelet count and two patients had thrombocytopenia. A grade IV myelofibrosis was present in 8/10 patients. Six patients evolved additional karyotypic abnormalities. Two patients had extramedullary BC. The serum activity of LDH (med. 1095.6) was elevated in all patients. A platelet dysfunction was documented in 4/5 patient tested. There are no clinical and hematological characteristics specific for Mk BC of CML. Normal or elevated platelet count (med. 427.4 x 109/L) in BC of CML with prominent expression of CD34 and CD61 antigens, and significant myelofibrosis (grade IV) are the most consistent clinical findings.

🔖

Cite This Article

LAZAREVIC, V., JANKOVIC, G., KRAGULJAC, N., DJORDJEVİC, V., MILJIC, P., BOGUNOVIC, M., RAJIC, Z., MARTİNOVIC, V. C., SUVAJDZIC, N., COLOVIC, M. (2001). Clinical, immunophenotypic and cytogenetic features of megakaryocytic blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia: A single institution study. Turkish Journal of Hematology, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 107–115. https://ajindex.com/articles/413054

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Nair C, Chopra H, Shinde S, et al. Immunophenotype and ultrastructural studies in blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia. Leuk & Lymphoma 1995;19(3- 4): 309-13
  2. Urbano-Ispizua A, Cervantes F, Matutes E, et al. Immunophenotypic characteristics of blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia: Correlation with clinicobiological features and survival. Leukemia 1993;7: 1349-54
  3. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel M, et al. Criteria for the diagnosis of acute leukemia of megakaryocyte lineage (M7). Ann Int Med 1985;103:460-2
  4. Cervantes F, Villamor N, Esteve J, et al. “Lymphoid” blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukaemia is associated with distinct clinicohaematological features. Br J Haematol 1998;100:123-8
  5. Derderian PM, Kantarjian HM, Talpaz M, et al. Chronic myelogenous leukemia in the lymphoid blast phase: Characteristisc, treatment response and prognosis. Am J Med 1993;94:69-74
  6. Cervantes F & Rozman C. A multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 1982;60:1298-304
  7. Janckila AJ, Elias JM. Biochemical and theoretical aspects of haematological cytochemistry. In: Scott CS. ed. Leukemia Cytochemistry and diagnosis: Principles and practice. Chichester: Ellis Horwood Limited; 1989:68-91
  8. Landay LA, Muirhead KA. Procedural guidelines for performing immunophenotyping by flow cytometry. Clin Immun & Immunopathol 1989;52:48-60
  9. Rothe G, Schmitz G. Consensus protocol for the flow cytometric immunophenotyping of hematopoietic malignancies. Leukemia 1996;10:877-95
  10. Novak A, Kruskic M, Ludoski M, Jurukovski V. Rapid method for obtaining high quality chromosome banding in the study of hematopoietic neoplasia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1994;74:109-14
  11. Mittelman F. (Ed.) An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. Ed. Karger (Basel) 1995
  12. Born GVR, Cross MJ. The aggregation of blood platelets. J Physiol 1963;168:178
  13. Faderl S, Talpaz M, Estrov Z, et al. The Biology of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. New Engl J Med 1999;341:164-72
  14. Cervantes F, Rozman M, Rosell J, Urbano-Ispizua A, et al. A study of prognostic factors in blast crisis of Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myelogenous leukaemia. Br J Haematol 1990;76:27-32
  15. Griffin JD, Todd RF, Ritz J, Nadler LM, et al. Differentiation patterns in the blastic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 1983;6:85-91
  16. Foti A, Cline MJ. Sequential relapses of blastic crisis may involve different clones of cells with different molecular abno