Journals / Turkish Journal of Hematology / 2011 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

Kronik lenfositik lösemi (KLL) tanı ve tedavisine ilişkin, özellikle yüksek riskli KLL odaklanan güncel stratejiler: Derleyici bir inceleme

Current strategies for the diagnosis and management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), with a focus on poor-risk CLL: A review

Pages
86–96
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this review was to outline the current strategies for the diagnosis and management of CLL, with a focus on high-risk CLL.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Despite substantial advancement in the understanding and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), a standard curative approach does not exist.
📊
Key Findings & Data:About 20% of patients that require treatment have an aggressive disease course and die within a few years, despite early initiation of intensive therapy (poor-risk CLL).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this review was to outline the current strategies for the diagnosis and management of CLL, with a focus on high-risk CLL.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Despite substantial advancement in the understanding and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), a standard curative approach does not exist. The choice of treatment is generally based on the existence of biological and genetic factors associated with the prediction of prognosis, individual response to therapy, and duration of remission. About 20% of patients that require treatment have an aggressive disease course and die within a few years, despite early initiation of intensive therapy (poor-risk CLL). Poor-risk CLL can be predicted by the presence of genomic markers, and the quality and duration of response to purine-analogue-based treatment. Within this patient subgroup alternative treatment approaches such as alemtuzumab or new substances such as flavopiridol or IMiDs® should be considered. To date, the only treatment bearing curative potential is allogeneic stem cell transplantation; in contrast to conventional immunochemotherapy, it can provide long-term disease control, even in patients with del 17p or other unfavorable biological and clinical risk factors. The aim of this review was to outline the current strategies for the diagnosis and management of CLL, with a focus on high-risk CLL.

Özet

Kronik lenfositik löseminin (KLL) tanı ve tedavisine yönelik önemli gelişmelere karşın, şifa sağlayıcı (küratif) standart bir yaklaşım henüz bulunmamaktadır. Tedavi seçimi genellikle prognozu öngören biyolojik ve genetik faktörlerin varlığına, tedaviye alınan bireysel yanıt ve iyileşme (remisyon) süresine dayanır. Tedavi edilmesi gereken hastaların yaklaşık %20si hızla ilerleyen bir klinik gidiş gösterirler ve yoğun tedaviye erkenden başlanmasına karşın birkaç yıl içerisinde yaşamlarını yitirirler (yüksek riskli KLL). Yüksek riskli KLL olasılığı, genomik belirteçler yanında purin-analogu temelli tedaviye alınan yanıtın niteliği ve süresiyle önceden kestirilebilir. Bu hasta altgrubunda, alemtuzumab gibi alternatif tedavi yaklaşımları ya da flavopiridol ve IMiD® grubu gibi yeni ilaçlar göz önüne alınmalıdır. Günümüzde bu hastalarda şifa sağlayıcı potansiyele sahip tek tedavi seçeneği allogeneik kök hücre naklidir. Bu yöntemle, geleneksel immünokemoterapinin aksine, del 17p veya diğer olumsuz biyolojik ve klinik risk faktörlerine sahip hastalarda bile hastalığın uzun süreli denetimi sağlanabilir. Bu derleyici incelemede, yüksek riskli KLLye odaklanarak KLL tanı ve tedavisine ilişkin güncel stratejilerin özetlenmesi amaçlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

CLANAHAN, F. M., DREGER, P. (2011). Kronik lenfositik lösemi (KLL) tanı ve tedavisine ilişkin, özellikle yüksek riskli KLL odaklanan güncel stratejiler: Derleyici bir inceleme. Turkish Journal of Hematology, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 86–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/412687

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Sant M, Allemani C, Tereanu C, De Angelis R, Capocaccia R, Visser O, Marcos-Gragera R, Maynadié M, Simonetti A, Lutz JM, Berrino F. Incidence of hematologic malignancies in Europe by morphologic sub-type: results of the HAEMACARE project. Blood 2010;116:3724-34. 2.Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, Ruhl J, Howlader N, Tatalovich Z, Cho H, Mariotto A, Eisner MP Lewis DR, Cronin K, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Stinchcomb DG, Edwards BK (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2007,
  2. National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/ csr/1975_2007/, based on November 2009 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, 2010. 3.Morrison VA. Infectious complications of chronic lym- phocytic leukaemia: pathogenesis, spectrum of infec- tion, preventive approaches. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2010; 23: 145-53. 4.Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Rai KR, Grever MR, Kay NE, Schiffer CA, Oken MM, Keating MJ, Boldt DH, Kempin SJ, et al. Guidelines for clinical protocols for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Recommendations of the national cancer institute-sponsored working group. American Journal of Hematology 1988;29:152-63. 5.Hallek M, Cheson BD, Catovsky D, Caligaris-Cappio F, Dighiero G, Döhner H, Hillmen P Keating MJ, Montserrat E, Rai KR, Kipps TJ; International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a report from the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia updating the National Cancer Institute-Working Group 1996 guidelines. Blood 2008;111:5446-56. 6.Rawstron AC, Bennett FL, O'Connor SJ, Kwok M, Fenton JA, Plummer M, de Tute R, Owen RG, Richards SJ, Jack AS, Hillmen P Monoclonal B-Cell Lymphocytosis and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. New England Journal of Medicine 2008;359:575-83. 7.Müller-Hermelink HK, Montserrat E, Catovsky D, Campo E, Harris NL, Stein H. Chronic lymphocytic leu- kaemia/ small lymphocytic leukaemia. In: Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, et al. eds. WHO Classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. 4th Edition ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2008. 8.Moreau EJ, Matutes E, A'Hern RP et al. Improvement of the chronic lymphocytic leukemia scoring system with the monoclonal antibody SN8 (CD79b). Am J Clin Pathol 1997;108:378-82. 9.Ginaldi L, De Martinis M, Matutes E, Farahat N, Morilla R, Catovsky D. Levels of expression of CD19 and CD20 in chronic B cell leukaemias. Journal of Cl