Journals / Turkish Journal of Hematology / 2015 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Miyeloproliferatif Neoplazilerde Ruxolitinib İlacının Klinik Geliştirilmesine Farmakobiyolojik Yaklaşım

Pharmacobiological Approach for the Clinical Development of Ruxolitinib in Myeloproliferative neoplasms

Pages
163–167
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We believe that a true clinical development approach for this drug should include pharmacobiological assessments for ruxolitinib in addition to the disease risk profile of MPns.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Ruxolitinib, a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor drug, has recently been approved for the treatment of patients with high- or intermediate- risk myelofibrosis with symptomatic splenomegaly.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We propose hypotheses based on our experience in a splenectomized MPn patient with hyperproliferative bone marrow and moderate fibrosis receiving ruxolitinib.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We believe that a true clinical development approach for this drug should include pharmacobiological assessments for ruxolitinib in addition to the disease risk profile of MPns.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Ruxolitinib, a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor drug, has recently been approved for the treatment of patients with high- or intermediate- risk myelofibrosis with symptomatic splenomegaly. Ruxolitinib is the first clinically useful targeted therapy in Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPns). The aim of this paper is to indicate pharmacobiological aspects of ruxolitinib within the potential context of MPns. Pharmacobiological assessments, in addition to knowledge of the risk profile for ruxolitinib in MPns, are required. We propose hypotheses based on our experience in a splenectomized MPn patient with hyperproliferative bone marrow and moderate fibrosis receiving ruxolitinib. We believe that a true clinical development approach for this drug should include pharmacobiological assessments for ruxolitinib in addition to the disease risk profile of MPns.

Özet

Ruxolitinib, JAK1 ve JAK2 inhibitörü olarak işlev gören bir ilaçtır. Semptomatik splenomegalisi olan orta- veya yüksek-risk myelofibrozis hastalarında kullanımı uluslararası onam almıştır. Bu bağlamda ruxolitinib, Philadelphia kromozomu negatif myeloproliferatif neoplaziler (MPn) için klinik yararı gösterilen ilk hedefe yönelik ajan konumundadır. Bu yazının amacı, ruxolitinibin MPnnin klinik tablolarındaki potansiyel kullanım alanları konusunda farmakobiyolojik yönleri tartışmaktır. Ruxolitinib onamları başlıca hastalık risk faktörleri üzerinden yapılmaktadır. Ancak klinik kullanımda hastalığın ve ilacın farmakobiyolojik yönlerini de dikkate alma gerekliliği vardır. Bu hipotezimizi tartışırken splenektomize bir MPn hastamızda, hiperproliferatif bir kemik iliği ve orta derecede fibrozis mevcutken uyguladığımız ruxolitinib tedavisinden elde ettiğimiz deneyimlere dayandık. İlacın gelecekte klinik geliştirilmesi gerçekleştirilirken MPn risk profili yanı sıra farmakobiyolojik değerlendirmelerin de yapılması gerektiği düşüncesindeyiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

ELİAÇIK, E., IŞIK, A., AKSU, S., ÜNER, A., BÜYÜKAŞIK, Y., SAYINALP, N., GÖKER, H., ÖZCEBE, O. İ., HAZNEDAROĞLU, İ. C. (2015). Miyeloproliferatif Neoplazilerde Ruxolitinib İlacının Klinik Geliştirilmesine Farmakobiyolojik Yaklaşım. Turkish Journal of Hematology, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 163–167. https://ajindex.com/articles/412510

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Cervantes F, Martinez-Trillos A. Myelofibrosis: an update on current pharmacotherapy and future directions. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2013;14:873-884
  2. Harrison C, Kiladjian JJ, Al-Ali HK, Gisslinger H, Waltzman R, Stalbovskaya V, McQuitty M, Hunter DS, Levy R, Knoops L, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, Barbui T, Barosi G. JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med 2012;366:787-798
  3. Harrison CN, Mesa RA, Kiladjian JJ, Al-Ali HK, Gisslinger H, Knoops L, Squier M, Sirulnik A, Mendelson E, Zhou X, Copley- Merriman C, Hunter DS, Levy RS, Cervantes F, Passamonti F, Barbui T, Barosi G, Vannucchi AM. Health-related quality of life and symptoms in patients with myelofibrosis treated with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy. Br J Haematol 2013;162:229-239
  4. Haznedaroglu IC. Ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med 2012;366:2032
  5. Pardanani A, Vannucchi AM, Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Barbui T, Tefferi A. JAK inhibitor therapy for myelofibrosis: critical assessment of value and limitations. Leukemia 2011;25:218-225
  6. Tefferi A, Litzow MR, Pardanani A. Long-term outcome of treatment with ruxolitinib in myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med 2011;365:1455-1457
  7. Tefferi A, Pardanani A. Serious adverse events during ruxolitinib treatment discontinuation in patients with myelofibrosis. Mayo Clin Proc 2011;86:1188-1191
  8. Kvasnicka HM, Thiele J, Bueso-Ramos CE, Hou K, Cortes JE, Kantarjian HM, Verstovsek S. Exploratory analysis of the effect of ruxolitinib on bone marrow morphology in patients with myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol (ASCO Meeting Abstracts) 2013;31:7030
  9. Haznedaroglu IC. The therapeutic goals of essential thrombocythemia under the clouds of over-treatment and under- treatment. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2013;14:1431-1436.