Journals / Turkish Journal of Pediatrics / 2018 / Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 3

Efficacy of rufinamide in childhood refractory epilepsy

Pages
238–243
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was seen to be effective especially inpatients diagnosed with LGS and drop/attacks types of seizures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Rufinamide has been used as a new antiepileptic drug in the treatment ofdrug-resistant epilepsy, in recent years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We retrospectively reviewedthe data of epileptic patients who were followed up between January 2004and December 2014 in the Pediatric Neurology Department.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was seen to be effective especially inpatients diagnosed with LGS and drop/attacks types of seizures.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Rufinamide has been used as a new antiepileptic drug in the treatment ofdrug-resistant epilepsy, in recent years. The objective of this study was toevaluate the reliability of rufinamide and its impact on seizure frequency inpatients diagnosed with drug-resistant epilepsy, where seizures could not becontrolled with ‘classical’ antiepileptic drugs. We retrospectively reviewedthe data of epileptic patients who were followed up between January 2004and December 2014 in the Pediatric Neurology Department. Patients whowere diagnosed with ‘drug resistant epilepsy’ and treated with rufinamidewere evaluated. Decrease in seizure frequency and drug side effects wereassessed as parameters. A total of 38 patients (14 girls, 24 boys) with amean age of 8.5 (range, 3.5-17) years were included in the study. The meanfollow-up duration was 25.5 (23-29.5) months, while the mean maximaldose of rufinamide was 32.5 (28-42) mg/kg/day. Response to treatmentwas assessed by the reduction in frequency of seizures. The decrease was 50%) was 55.5%. In the LGS group, patients withdrop/attacks showed the best response to treatment. Rufinamide was noteffective in two patients diagnosed with Dravet syndrome. Rufinamide canbe safely used in pediatric patients who use multiple antiepileptic drugs andare unresponsive to the treatment. It was seen to be effective especially inpatients diagnosed with LGS and drop/attacks types of seizures.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, E. P., DEMİRKALE, Z. H., BEKTAŞ, G., ÖZKAN, M. U., TATLI, B., AYDINLI, N., ÇALIŞKAN, M., ÖZMEN, M. (2018). Efficacy of rufinamide in childhood refractory epilepsy. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics, Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 3, 238–243. https://ajindex.com/articles/412112

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Kwan P, Brodie MJ. Early identification of refractory epilepsy. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 314-319
  2. Vendrame M, Loddenkemper T, Gooty VD, et al. Experience with rufinamide in a pediatric population: A single center’s experience. Pediatr Neurol 2010; 43: 155-158
  3. Coppola G, Grosso S, Franzoni E, et al. Rufinamide in refractory childhood epileptic encephalopathies other than Lennoxe-Gastaut syndrome. Eur J Neurol 2011; 18: 246-251
  4. Vendrame M, Poduri A, Loddenkemper T, Kluger G, Coppola G, Kothare SV. Treatment of malignant migrating partial epilepsy of infancy with rufinamide: Report of five cases. Epileptic Disord 2011; 13: 18-21
  5. Kluger G, Kurlemann G, Haberlandt E, et al. Effectiveness and tolerability of rufinamide in children and adults with refractory epilepsy: First European experience. Epilepsy Behav 2009; 14: 491-495
  6. Grosso S, Coppola G, Dontin SD, et al. Efficacy and safety of rufinamide in children under four years of age with drug-resistant epilepsies. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2014: 18; 641-645
  7. White HS, Franklin MR, Kupferberg HJ, Schmutz M, Stables JP, Wolf HH. The anticonvulsant profile of rufinamide (CGP 33101) in rodent seizure models. Epilepsia 2008; 49: 1213-1220
  8. Perucca E, Cloyd J, Critchley D, Fuseau E. Rufinamide: Clinical pharmacokinetics and concentration-response relationships in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsia 2008; 49: 1123-1141
  9. Wirrell EC. Predicting pharmacoresistance in pediatric epilepsy. Epilepsia 2013; 54(Suppl 2): 19-22
  10. Epilepsy ILa. [Accessed 2nd July 2015]; Guidelines for Publications from League Commissions and Task Forces. 2014 Available at: http://www.ilae.org/visitors/ centre/guidelines.cfm
  11. Jaraba S, Santamarina E, Miró J, et al. Rufinamide in children and adults in routine clinical practice. Acta Neurol Scand 2017; 135: 122-128
  12. McMurray R, Striano P. Treatment of Adults with Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome: Further Analysis of Efficacy and Safety/Tolerability of Rufinamide. Neurol Ther 2016; 5: 35-43
  13. Glauser T, Kluger G, Sachdeo R, Krauss G, Perdomo C, Arroyo S. Rufinamide for generalized seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Neurology 2008; 70: 1950-1958
  14. Coppola G, Grosso S, Franzoni E, et al. Rufinamide in children and adults with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: First Italian multicenter experience. Seizure 2010; 19: 587-591
  15. Kim SH, Eun SH, Kang HC, et al. Rufinamide as an adjuvant treatment in children with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Seizure 2012; 21: 288-291. 16