SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Pediatrics / 2020 / Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 1

Are general movements at 3-5 months correlated and compatible with the Bayley-III at 1,5-2 years age?

Aysu KAHRAMAN
Ayşe LİVANELİOĞLU
Özgün Kaya KARA
Murat YURDAKÖK
Pages
89–93
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, although in the present study the Bayley-III underestimates the rates of motor impairment, it was found to be moderately compatible with the GMs at 3-5 months (r= 0.4, p<0.001).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Since early intervention is important in risky infants, it is also important to identify developmental problem as early as possible.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The present study aimed to compare the neurodevelopmental outcomes and Bayley-III scores at the age of 1.5-2 years with fidgety GMs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, although in the present study the Bayley-III underestimates the rates of motor impairment, it was found to be moderately compatible with the GMs at 3-5 months (r= 0.4, p<0.001).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Since early intervention is important in risky infants, it is also important to identify developmental problem as early as possible. There are various assessment methods for this. One of them is the General movements assessment (GMs), and the other one is the Bayley Scales of Infants and Toddler Developmental, third edition (Bayley-III). The present study aimed to compare the neurodevelopmental outcomes and Bayley-III scores at the age of 1.5-2 years with fidgety GMs. One hundred and twenty-six infants (57 females, 69 males) were assessed by the GMs at the corrected 3-5 months and also by the Bayley-III at the age of 1.5-2 years. According to the GMs, 21 infants exhibited the absence of fidgety movements, six infants exhibited abnormal fidgety movements, and 99 infants exhibited normal fidgety movements. According to the Bayley-III, 19 infants’ motor scores, 13 infants’ language scores, and 18 infants’ cognitive scores were low (-2SD). Various neurodevelopmental problems were identified in 25.4% of the infants. As a result, although in the present study the Bayley-III underestimates the rates of motor impairment, it was found to be moderately compatible with the GMs at 3-5 months (r= 0.4, p<0.001). However, the GMs were better than the Bayley-III in predicting neurodevelopmental outcomes at the age of 1.5-2. Although the Bayley-III and GMs may be valuable tools for estimating the later outcomes of infants, care should be taken while interpreting their results.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAHRAMAN, A., LİVANELİOĞLU, A., KARA, Ö. K., YURDAKÖK, M. (2020). Are general movements at 3-5 months correlated and compatible with the Bayley-III at 1,5-2 years age?. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics, Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 1, 89–93. https://ajindex.com/articles/411978

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Jongmans MJ. Early identification of children with Developmental Coordination disorder. In: Sugden DA, Chambers ME, (eds). Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder. London: Whurr Publishers, 2005: 155-167. 2.Prechtl HFR. Qualitative changes of spontaneous movements in fetus and preterm infant are a marker of neurological dysfunction. Early Hum Dev 1990
  2. Spittle AJ, Spencer-Smith MM, Eeles AL, et al. Does the Bayley-III motor scale at 2 years predict motor outcome at 4 years in very preterm children? Dev Med Child Neurol 2013
  3. Lüchinger AB, Hadders-Algra M, van Kan CM, de Vries JI. Fetal onset of general movements. Pediatr Res 2008
  4. Bosanquet M, Copeland L, Ware R, Boyd R. A systematic review of tests to predict cerebral palsy in young children. Dev Med Child Neurol 2013
  5. Einspieler C, Prechtl HF, Ferrari F, Cioni G, Bos AF. The qualitative assessment of general movements in preterm, term and young infants--review of the methodology. Early Hum Dev 1997
  6. Prechtl HF, Einspieler C, Cioni G, Bos AF, Ferrari F, Sontheimer D. An early marker for neurological deficits after perinatal brain lesions. Lancet 1997
  7. Einspieler C, Peharz R, Marschik PB. Fidgety movements - tiny in appearance, but huge in impact. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2016
  8. 92(3 Suppl 1): S64-S70. 9.Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (3rd ed). San Antonio: Texas: Harcourt Assessment, 2006. 10.Heinemann KR, Hadders-Algra M. Evaluation of neuromotor function in infancy-A systematic review of available methods. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2008
  9. Brogna C, Romeo DM, Cervesi C, et al. Prognostic value of the qualitative assessments of general movements in late-preterm infants. Early Hum Dev 2013
  10. Einspieler C, Yang H, Bartl-Pokorny KD, et al. Are sporadic fidgety movements as clinically relevant as is their absence? Early Hum Dev 2015
  11. Einspieler C, Marschik PB, Milioti S, Nakajima Y, Bos AF, Prechtl HF. Are abnormal fidgety movements an early marker for complex minor neurological dysfunction at puberty? Early Hum Dev 2007
  12. Zappella M, Einspieler C, Bartl-Pokorny KD, et al. What do home videos tell us about early motor and socio-communicative behaviours in children with autistic features during the second year of life-An exploratory study. Early Hum Dev 2015
  13. Hamer EG, Bos AF, Hadders-Algra M. Assessment of specific ch