Journals / Turkish Journal of Pediatrics / 2021 / Cilt: 63 - Sayı: 3

Early-auditory intervention in children with hearing loss and neurodevelopmental outcomes: cognitive, motor and language development

Pages
450–460
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Motor skills were not affected by the early-auditory intervention.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:To date, studies have mostly focused on the language outcome of early-auditory interventions including amplification for congenital hearing loss within the first 6 months.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The medical records of 104 patients were retrospectively reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Motor skills were not affected by the early-auditory intervention.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background. To date, studies have mostly focused on the language outcome of early-auditory interventions including amplification for congenital hearing loss within the first 6 months. We aimed to examine the effect of early-auditory intervention in patients with congenital hearing loss on cognitive, motor and language outcomes, and determine the clinical variables that affect developmental outcomes. Methods. The medical records of 104 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Children were evaluated by the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition. Results. The median ages of confirmation of hearing loss, amplification, starting auditory-verbal intervention and cochlear implantation were 9, 10, 13 and 19 months, respectively. Of the patients, 26% received a hearingaid fitting ≤6 months of age. Fifty-one children (49%) had additional disabilities. The median cognitive, language and motor scores of children with no additional disabilities were 95 (65-115), 68 (47-103) and 97 (58- 130), respectively and children with early-auditory intervention (≤6 months) demonstrated higher cognitive, receptive and expressive language subscale scores than late-auditory intervention group (p 0.05). A significant negative correlation was found between additional disability and cognitive, language and motor outcomes (r=-0.78, r=-0.54 and r=-0.75, respectively p<0.01). There was a significant negative correlation between language outcomes and the degree of hearing loss (r=-0.20, p<0.05). Multiple regression analyses revealed that additional disability and early-auditory intervention showed a significant amount of variance in cognitive and language scores. The early intervention did not make a significant, independent contribution on motor outcomes whereas additional disability did. Conclusions. Presence of additional disability was the strongest significant variable on developmental outcomes in hearing-impaired children. In children with no additional disability, significantly better cognitive and language scores were associated with the early-auditory intervention. Motor skills were not affected by the early-auditory intervention.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, P., SUCAKLI, İ. A., KESEROĞLU, K., SAYLAM, G., YAKUT, H. İ., ER, S. (2021). Early-auditory intervention in children with hearing loss and neurodevelopmental outcomes: cognitive, motor and language development. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics, Cilt: 63 - Sayı: 3, 450–460. https://ajindex.com/articles/411792

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Black MM, Walker SP, Fernald LCH, et al; Lancet Early Childhood Development Series Steering Committee. Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course. Lancet 2017; 389: 77-90
  2. Shonkoff JP, Phillips DA; National Research Council (US) and Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Integrating the Science of Early Childhood Development. From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development. Washington DC: National Academies Press (US), 2000
  3. American Academy of Pediatrics, Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH). Year 2007 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics 2007; 120: 898-921
  4. Nott P, Cowan R, Brown PM, Wigglesworth G. Early language development in children with profound hearing loss fitted with a device at a young age: part I--the time period taken to acquire first words and first word combinations. Ear Hear 2009; 30: 526-540
  5. Tomblin JB, Harrison M, Ambrose SE, Walker EA, Oleson JJ, Moeller MP. Language outcomes in young children with mild to severe hearing loss. Ear Hear 2015; 36(Suppl 1): S76-S91
  6. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). Effects of Hearing Loss on Development. Available at: www. asha. org/ public/ hearing/ effects- of- hearing- loss- ondevelopment. (Accessed on November 12, 2019)
  7. Sininger YS, Grimes A, Christensen E. Auditory development in early amplified children: factors influencing auditory-based communication outcomes in children with hearing loss. Ear Hear 2010; 31: 166-185
  8. Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey AL, Wiggin M, Chung W. Early hearing detection and vocabulary of children with hearing loss. Pediatrics 2017; 140: e20162964
  9. Pierson SK, Caudle SE, Krull KR, Haymond J, Tonini R, Oghalai JS. Cognition in children with sensorineural hearing loss: etiologic considerations. Laryngoscope 2007; 117: 1661-1665
  10. Chapman RS. Children’s language learning: an interactionist perspective. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2000; 41: 33-54
  11. Kutz W, Wright C, Krull KR, Manolidis S. Neuropsychological testing in the screening for cochlear implant candidacy. Laryngoscope 2003; 113: 763-766
  12. Schlumberger E, Narbona J, Manrique M. Nonverbal development of children with deafness with and without cochlear implants. Dev Med Child Neurol 2004; 46: 599-606
  13. Nandi R, Luxon LM. Development and assessment of the vestibular system. Int J Audiol 2008; 47: 566- 577
  14. Kaga K, Shinjo Y, Jin Y, Ta