Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2021 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1

Day-case robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: Feasibility and safety

Pages
30–34
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With adequate protocols in place, these surgeries might prove to be better than the available minimally invasive techniques and can become the standard of care in the future.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The delivery of surgical services has undergone a shift in the past decade with increasing numbers of surgeries being performed in the daycare setting.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and methods: In this prospective observational study, 43 patients underwent DC RALS performed by a single surgeon over 18 months [simple nephrectomy (n=7), radical nephrectomy (n=15), radical nephrectomy with para-aortic lymphadenectomy (n=5), and adrenalectomy (n=5)].
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With adequate protocols in place, these surgeries might prove to be better than the available minimally invasive techniques and can become the standard of care in the future.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The delivery of surgical services has undergone a shift in the past decade with increasing numbers of surgeries being performed in the daycare setting. Implementing a minimally invasive surgical approach with a robot with an enhanced recovery protocol permits robot-assisted laparoscopic surgeries (RALS) to be performed as a day-case (DC) procedure. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of DC surgery according to our experience. Material and methods: In this prospective observational study, 43 patients underwent DC RALS performed by a single surgeon over 18 months [simple nephrectomy (n=7), radical nephrectomy (n=15), radical nephrectomy with para-aortic lymphadenectomy (n=5), and adrenalectomy (n=5)]. In addition, reconstructive urological procedures that included pyeloplasty (n=9), ureteroureterostomy (n=1), and bladder diverticulectomy with ureteric re-implantation (n=1) were performed as DC surgeries during this study period. RALS was performed in the standard way with an enhanced recovery pathway of care for DC. We collected data regarding the demographic information, medical comorbidities, preoperative outcomes, intraoperative outcomes, complications, length of stay, and readmission rates. The data were analyzed and evaluated. Results: All the patients (100%) were successfully discharged on the same day with no major complications (Clavien–Dindo grade>I). The readmission rates were 0%. Conclusion: DC RALS are safe and feasible with an enhanced recovery protocol. With adequate protocols in place, these surgeries might prove to be better than the available minimally invasive techniques and can become the standard of care in the future.

🔖

Cite This Article

RAGAVAN, N., BAFNA, S., THANGARASU, M., PRAKASH, S., PAUL, R., CHIRRAVUR, P., RAMANI, S. (2021). Day-case robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: Feasibility and safety. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1, 30–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/411567

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Lin CY, Yang CR, Cheng CL, Ho HC, Chiu KY, Su CK, et al. Application in robotic urologic surgery. J Chin Med Assoc 2014;77:242-5. [Crossref] 2. Moughnyeh M, Lindeman B, Porterfield JR, Dream S. Outpatient robot-assisted adrenalectomy: Is it safe? Am J Surg 2020;220:296- 7. [Crossref] 3. Quemby DJ, Stocker ME. Day surgery development and practice: Key factors for a successful pathway. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain 2014;14:256-61. [Crossref] 4. Philip BK. Day care surgery: The United States model of health care. Ambulatory Surgery 2012;174:81-2. 5. Cassinotti E, Colombo EM, Di Giuseppe M, Rovera F, Dionigi G, Boni L. Current indications for laparoscopy in day-case surgery. Int J Surg 2008;6(Suppl 1):S93-6. [Crossref] 6. Rubinstein M, Finelli A, Moinzadeh A, Singh D, Ukimura O, Desai MM, et al. Outpatient laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Urology 2005;66:41-3. [Crossref] 7. Ilie CP, Luscombe CJ, Smith I, Boddy J, Mischianu D, Golash A. Day case laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Endourol 2011;25:631-4. [Crossref] 8. Ortiz DI, Findling JW, Carroll TB, Javorsky BR, Carr AA, Evans DB, et al. Cosyntropin stimulation testing on postoperative day 1 allows for selective glucocorticoid replacement therapy after adrenalectomy for hypercortisolism: Results of a novel, multidisciplinary institutional protocol. Surgery 2016;159:259- 65. [Crossref] 9. Chaussy Y, Becmeur F, Lardy H, Aubert D. Robot-assisted surgery: Current status evaluation in abdominal and urological pediatric surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2013;23:530- 8. [Crossref] 10. Ahmed K, Ibrahim A, Wang TT, Khan N, Challacombe B, Khan MS, et al. Assessing the cost effectiveness of robotics in urological surgery - a systematic review. BJU Int 2012;110:1544-56. [Crossref] 11. Ragavan N, Dholakia K, Baskaran J, Ramesh M. Day-case laparoscopic nephrectomy: Feasibility and safety. J Clin Urol 2019;12:466-9. [Crossref] 12. Palmer JS. Extravesical ureteral reimplantation: An outpatient procedure. J Urol 2008;180(Suppl 4):1828-31. [Crossref] 13. Manzia TM, Quaranta C, Filingeri V, Toti L, Anselmo A, Tariciotti L, et al. Feasibility and cost effectiveness of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A retrospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg 2020;55:56-61. [Crossref] 14. Zografos GN, Farfaras A, Vasiliadis G, Pappa T, Aggeli C, Vasilatou E, et al. Laparoscopic resection of large adrenal tumors. JSLS 2010;14:364-8. [Crossref]