Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2021 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1

Association between the lengths of excised obstructed vas deferens segments at the time of vasovasostomy and surgical outcomes

Pages
3–8
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In this cohort, the length of the excised obstructed vas deferens at VV was associated with improved sperm motility at 3 and 9 months postoperatively but not with pregnancy outcomes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to determine whether the length of the excised obstructed vas deferens at vasovasostomy (VV) performed for fertility is associated with semen parameters and/or pregnancy outcomes postoperatively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and methods: The patients who underwent a VV at our institution from September 2004 to December 2018 were contacted via questionnaire and a chart review was performed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In this cohort, the length of the excised obstructed vas deferens at VV was associated with improved sperm motility at 3 and 9 months postoperatively but not with pregnancy outcomes.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: This study aimed to determine whether the length of the excised obstructed vas deferens at vasovasostomy (VV) performed for fertility is associated with semen parameters and/or pregnancy outcomes postoperatively. Material and methods: The patients who underwent a VV at our institution from September 2004 to December 2018 were contacted via questionnaire and a chart review was performed. Linear and logistic regression models were used to determine the associations between the length of the obstructed vas deferens removed and postoperative outcomes including sperm concentration, motility, and successful pregnancy after reversal. Results: A total of 83/170 questionnaires were returned. After exclusions, a total of 35 patients were included for analysis. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 40.1 years and the mean time since vasectomy 9.3 years. The mean length of the obstructed vas deferens removed during VV was 2.25 cm. The longer the vas deferens segments removed, the more significant was the increase in sperm motility at 3 and 9 months postoperatively (p=0.011 and 0.008, respectively), but decreased sperm motility at 6 months (p=0.029). In 75.9% of the patients, sperm was present postoperatively, 23.2% achieved pregnancy through natural conception, and 55.8% achieved pregnancy using assisted reproductive techniques. There was no significant relationship between the length of the vas deferens removed and sperm concentration or pregnancy achieved after surgery. Conclusion: In this cohort, the length of the excised obstructed vas deferens at VV was associated with improved sperm motility at 3 and 9 months postoperatively but not with pregnancy outcomes.

🔖

Cite This Article

PAUL, C. J., WEST, J. M., WALD, M. (2021). Association between the lengths of excised obstructed vas deferens segments at the time of vasovasostomy and surgical outcomes. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1, 3–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/411565

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Ostrowski KA, Holt SK, Haynes B, Davies BJ, Fuchs EF, Walsh TJ. Evaluation of Vasectomy Trends in the United States. Urology 2018;118:76-9. [Crossref] 2. Patel AP, Smith RP. Vasectomy reversal: a clinical update. Asian J Androl 2016;18:365-71. [Crossref] 3. Schwarzer JU, Steinfatt H. Current status of vasectomy reversal. Nat Rev Urol 2013;10:195-205. [Crossref] 4. Ramasamy R, Mata DA, Jain L, Perkins AR, Marks SH, Lipshultz LI. Microscopic visualization of intravasal spermatozoa is positively associated with patency after bilateral microsurgical vasovasostomy. Andrology 2015;3:532-5. [Crossref] 5. Namekawa T, Imamoto T, Kato M, Komiya A, Ichikawa T. Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Review of the procedures, outcomes, and predictors of patency and pregnancy over the last decade. Reprod Med Biol 2018;17:343-55. [Crossref] 6. Yoon YE, Lee HH, Park SY, Moon HS, Kim DS, Song SH, et al. The role of vasoepididymostomy for treatment of obstructive azoospermia in the era of in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl 2018;21:67-73. [Crossref] 7. Berger RE. Triangulation end-to-side vasoepididymostomy. J Urol 1998;159:1951-3. [Crossref] 8. Cosentino M, Peraza MF, Vives A, Sanchez J, Moreno D, Perona J, et al. Factors predicting success after microsurgical vasovasostomy. Int Urol Nephrol 2018;50:625-32. [Crossref] 9. Herrel LA, Goodman M, Goldstein M, Hsiao W. Outcomes of microsurgical vasovasostomy for vasectomy reversal: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Urology 2015;85:819-25. [Crossref] 10. Magheli A, Rais-Bahrami S, Kempkensteffen C, Weiske WH, Miller K, Hinz S. Impact of obstructive interval and sperm granuloma on patency and pregnancy after vasectomy reversal. Int J Androl 2010;33:730-5. [Crossref] 11. Hayden RP, Li PS, Goldstein M. Microsurgical vasectomy reversal: contemporary techniques, intraoperative decision making, and surgical training for the next generation. Fertil Steril 2019;111:444- 53. [Crossref] 12. Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S, Auger J, Baker HW, Behre HM, et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update 2010;16:231- 45. [Crossref]