Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2006 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

Kolon kitlelerinin tespitinde MR kolonografi

Detection of colonic masses with MR colonography

Pages
191–197
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In symptomatic patients, this new technique shows promising results for the detection and imaging of colorectal masses.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aims: Magnetic resonance colonography based on magnetic resonance imaging is a relatively new diagnostic modality for diagnosing colon pathology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was to evaluate its performance in detecting colorectal masses.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In symptomatic patients, this new technique shows promising results for the detection and imaging of colorectal masses.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Gizli kan · Adenokarsinom · İn situ karsinom

Abstract

Background/aims: Magnetic resonance colonography based on magnetic resonance imaging is a relatively new diagnostic modality for diagnosing colon pathology. The aim of this study was to evaluate its performance in detecting colorectal masses. Methods: Thirty-three patients (20 male, 13 female; age range 28-85 years; mean age 78.7) suspected of having colonic lesions because of rectal bleeding, positive fecal occult blood test results or altered bowel habits underwent magnetic resonance colonography and subsequent conventional colonoscopy. All patients underwent standard bowel preparation 24 h before magnetic resonance colonography. Patients were placed in a supine position on the magnetic resonance table. After placement of a rectal tube, the colon was filled with of a mixture of 1000-1800 ml 0.9% NaCl solution and 15-20 ml 0.5 mmol/L gadopentetate dimeglumine solution. Once colonic distension was achieved, 3D GRE magnetic resonance colonography and complementary Magnetic resonance images were taken in all cases. Results: Sensitivity of magnetic resonance colonography for colorectal masses was 90% and specificity was 100%. Percentage of correct diagnosis of magnetic resonance colonography was 94.3%. Magnetic resonance colonography was well tolerated without sedation or analgesia. Conclusions: Magnetic resonance colonography is a new technique for imaging of the colon. Magnetic resonance colonography has potential advantages of multiplanar capabilities and of being a less-invasive imaging technique; it can be implemented in daily practice and has a role in accurately staging colorectal cancers. In symptomatic patients, this new technique shows promising results for the detection and imaging of colorectal masses.

Özet

Manyetik rezonansla görüntüleme temeline dayanan manyetik rezonans kolonografi kolon patolojilerinin teşhisinde yeni diagnostik bir metoddur. Bu çalışmada amacımız kolorektal kitlelerinin tanısında manyetik rezonansla kolonografinin tanısal etkinliğini değerlendirmektir. Yöntem: Klinikte, rektal kanama, gaitada gizli kan pozitifliği veya barsak alışkanlığında değişiklik gibi nedenlerle kolon patolojisinden şüphelenilen 33 olguya (20 erkek, 13 kadın; 28-85 yaşları arasında;yaş ortalaması 78,7) manyetik rezonans kolonografi ve konvansiyonel kolonoskopi yapıldı. Tüm olgulara uygun barsak temizliği yaptırıldı. Olgular manyetik rezonans masasına supin pozisyonunda yerleştirildi. 1000-1800 mi % 0,9 NaCl içerisine 15-20 mi 0,5 mmol gadopentetate dimeglumine ilave edilerek elde edilen karışım rektal lavman yoluyla verildi. Tüm olgularda kolon distansiyonu sonrası 3B GRE manyetik rezonans kolonografi ve tamamlayıcı manyetik rezonans imajları elde edildi. Bulgular: Manyetik rezonans kolonografinin kolorektal kitlelerde sensivitesi % 90 ve spesifitesi % 100 bulundu. Sedasyon ve analjezik gerekmeksizin iyi tolere edilen manyetik rezonansla kolonografinin tanıda doğruluk oranı % 94.3'tür. Sonuç: Manyetik rezonansla kolonografi kolonun görüntülenmesinde yeni bir tekniktir. Manyetik rezonans kolonografinin multiplanar görüntüleme yapabilmesi, az invaziv olması, kolorektal kanserlerin doğru evrelendirilmesinde etkin bir rolünün olması ve günlük kullanımda uygulanabilir olması gibi avantajları vardır. Manyetik rezonans kolonografi semptomatik hastalarda kolorektal kitlelerin görüntülenmesinde ve tespit edilmesinde umut vaat eden yeni bir tekniktir.

🔖

Cite This Article

HAYKIR, R., KARAKÖSE, S., KARABACAKOĞLU, A., KAYAÇETİN, E., ŞAHİN, M. (2006). Kolon kitlelerinin tespitinde MR kolonografi. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 191–197. https://ajindex.com/articles/411427

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SR, et al. Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 525-32
  2. Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, Waye JD, et al. Risk and surveillance of individuals with colorectal polyps. WHO Collaborating Centre for the prevention of colorectal cancer. Bull World Health Organ 1990; 68: 789-95
  3. Toribara NW, Sleisenger MH. Screening for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 861-7
  4. Vining DJ, Gelfand DW, Beachtold RE, et al. Technical feasibility of colon imaging with helical CT and virtual reality. AJR 1994; 162: 104
  5. Schoenenberger AW, Bauerfeind P, Krestin GP, et al. Virtual colonoscopy with magnetic resonance imaging: in vitro evaluation of a new concept. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 1863-70
  6. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Steiner P, et al. Preliminary assessment of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for various colonic disorders. Lancet 1997; 349: 1288-91
  7. Lomas DJ, Sood RR, Graves MJ, et al. Colon carcinoma MR imaging with CO2 enema –- pilot study. Radiology 2001; 219: 558-62
  8. Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 594-642
  9. Ahlquit DA, Wieand HS, Moertel CG, et al. Accuracy of fecal occult blood screening for colorectal neoplasia. A prospective study using Hemoccult and HemoQuant tests. J Am Med Assoc 1993; 269: 1262-7
  10. Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CP, et al. A casecontrol study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 653-7
  11. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 162-8
  12. Brady AP, Stevenson GW, Stevenson I. Colorectal cancer overlooked at barium enema examination and colonoscopy: a continuing perceptual problem. Radiology 1994; 192: 373-8
  13. Kewenter J, Breringe H, Engaras B, Haglind E. The value of flexible sigmoidoscopy and double-contrast barium enema in the diagnosis of neoplasms in the rectum and colon in subjects with a positive Hemoccult test: results of 1831 rectosigmoidoscopies and double-contrast enemas. Endoscopy 1995; 27: 159-63
  14. Winawer SJ, Stewart ET, Zauber AG, et al. A comparison of colonoscopy and double- contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1766-72
  15. Marshall JB, Barthel JS. The frequency of total colonoscopy and terminal ileal intubation in the 19