SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2016 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling: How can we improve the results?

Emrah ALPER
İREM ONUR
Mahmut ARABUL
Belkıs ÜNSAL
Pages
1–3
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the presence of an experienced endoscopist and cytopathologist, the size of the needle does not have any significant impact on the diagnostic success.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) enables a gastroenterologist to sample the masses of the middle and inferior mediastinum, which are adjacent to the esophagus; cystic or solid lesions of the pancreas, which are adjacent to the stomach and duodenum; and perirectal lesions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Needles used for EUS sampling include aspiration (19, 20, and 22 Gauge) or core biopsy needles (ProCore and Trucut) (19, 20, and 22 Gauge).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the presence of an experienced endoscopist and cytopathologist, the size of the needle does not have any significant impact on the diagnostic success.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) enables a gastroenterologist to sample the masses of the middle and inferior mediastinum, which are adjacent to the esophagus; cystic or solid lesions of the pancreas, which are adjacent to the stomach and duodenum; and perirectal lesions. Needles used for EUS sampling include aspiration (19, 20, and 22 Gauge) or core biopsy needles (ProCore and Trucut) (19, 20, and 22 Gauge). The type and size of EUS needles do not alter the diagnostic results. Rapid on-site cytopathological evaluation will increase the diagnostic efficacy to 100% without prolonging the procedure time. Diagnostic efficacy of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration or core biopsy depends on the experience of an endoscopist and a cytopathologist. In the presence of an experienced endoscopist and cytopathologist, the size of the needle does not have any significant impact on the diagnostic success.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALPER, E., ONUR, İ., ARABUL, M., ÜNSAL, B. (2016). Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling: How can we improve the results?. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 1–3. https://ajindex.com/articles/411077

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Kopelman Y, Marmor S, Ashkenazi I, Fireman Z. Value of EUS-FNA cytological preparations compared with cell block sections in the diagnosis of pancreatic solid tumours. Cytopathology 2011; 22: 174-8.
  2. Ieni A, Barresi V, Todaro P, Caruso RA, Tuccari G. Cell-block proce- dure in endoscopic ultrasound-guided-fine-needle-aspiration of gastrointestinal solid neoplastic lesions. World J Gastrointest En- dosc 2015; 7: 1014-22. Zhang XC1, Li QL, Yu YF, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle sampling for upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2015; 27. Na HK, Lee JH, Park YS, et al. Yields and Utility of Endoscopic Ul- trasonography-Guided 19-Gauge Trucut Biopsy versus 22-Gauge Fine Needle Aspiration for Diagnosing Gastric Subepithelial Tu- mors. Clin Endosc 2015; 48: 152-7.
  3. Kim GH, Cho YK, Kim EY, et al. Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonog- raphy-guided subepithelial tumor sampling. Scand J Gastroen- terol 2014; 49: 347-54.
  4. Nagula S, Pourmand K, Aslanian HR, et al. EUS-fine needle aspira- tion (FNA) vs. EUS-fine needle biopsy (FNB) for solid mass lesions: interim analysis of a large multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77. De La Mora-Levy JG, Florez-Sarmiento CF, Alonso-Larraga JO, Campuzano JO, Del Monte JS, Hernandez-Guerrero A. Direct comparison between Procore(TM), and non-Procore(TM) fine needle aspiration biopsy needles: does it make any difference in expert hands? Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77(5 Suppl): AB360. Strand DS, Shami VM, Sauer BG, Wang AY. EUS-guided 22-gauge fine needle aspiration is superior to EUS-guided 22-gauge core needle biopsy in the evaluation of solid pancreatic neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77(5 Suppl): AB403. Choi HJ, Moon JH, Kim HK, et al. Comparison of EUS-fine needle biopsy with EUS-fine needle aspiration as a historical control for diagnosis of pancreatic solid masses. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77(5 Suppl): AB401. Ramay F, Singh M, Sood V. Retrospective study comparing yield of EUS 22G FNA/FNB of abnormal lymph nodes: single tertiary referral center experience. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77(5 Suppl): AB360 O'Connor K, Cheriyan DG, Li-Chang HH, et al. Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy Specimens: Adequate Diagnostic Yield and Accuracy Can Be Achieved without On-Site Evaluation. Acta Cytol 2015; 59: 305-10.
  5. Vilmann P, Saftoiu A, Hollerbach S,