Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2017 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4

Does steatosis affect the performance of diffusion-weighted MRI values for fibrosis evaluation in patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 4?

Pages
283–288
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Background/Aims: To evaluate the effect of hepatic steatosis on the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of hepatic fibrosis in patients with HCV genotype 4-related chronic hepatitis.Materials and Methods: Overall, 268 chronic hepatitis C patients (164 males and 104 females) underwent liver biopsy for fibrosis assessment by the METAVIR score and grading for hepatic steatosis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/Aims: To evaluate the effect of hepatic steatosis on the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of hepatic fibrosis in patients with HCV genotype 4-related chronic hepatitis.Materials and Methods: Overall, 268 chronic hepatitis C patients (164 males and 104 females) underwent liver biopsy for fibrosis assessment by the METAVIR score and grading for hepatic steatosis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:They were classified into early fibrosis stage (F1, F2) and advanced fibrosis stage (F3, F4).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The cutoff value for ADC for steatosis prediction in patients with an advanced stage of fibrosis was 1.17×10-3 mm2/s, with a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 88.5% Conclusion: Histologically detected hepatic steatosis should always be considered when assessing hepatic fibrosis using diffusion-weighted MRI to avoid the underestimation of the ADC value in patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 4
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background/Aims: To evaluate the effect of hepatic steatosis on the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of hepatic fibrosis in patients with HCV genotype 4-related chronic hepatitis.Materials and Methods: Overall, 268 chronic hepatitis C patients (164 males and 104 females) underwent liver biopsy for fibrosis assessment by the METAVIR score and grading for hepatic steatosis. They were classified into early fibrosis stage (F1, F2) and advanced fibrosis stage (F3, F4). Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) of the liver was performed using 1.5-Tesla scanners, and the ADC value of the patients with and without steatosis in different stages of fibrosis was estimated and compared.Results: In patients with early fibrosis, the ADC value significantly decreased in patients with steatosis (1.52±0.17×10-3 mm2/s) compared to that in patients without steatosis (1.65±0.11×10-3 mm2/s) (p<0.001). In those with an advanced stage of fibrosis, the ADC value was also significantly decreased in patients with steatosis (1.07±0.16×10-3 mm2/s) compared with that in patients without steatosis (1.35±0.11×10-3 mm2/s) (p≤0.001). The cutoff value for ADC for steatosis prediction in the early fibrosis group was 1.585 according to the AUROC curve, with a sensitivity of 76.8% and a specificity of 73.5%. The cutoff value for ADC for steatosis prediction in patients with an advanced stage of fibrosis was 1.17×10-3 mm2/s, with a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 88.5% Conclusion: Histologically detected hepatic steatosis should always be considered when assessing hepatic fibrosis using diffusion-weighted MRI to avoid the underestimation of the ADC value in patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 4

🔖

Cite This Article

BESHEER, T., RAZEK, A. A. K. A., EL-BENDARY, M., EL-MAKSOUD, M. A., ELALFY, H., ZALATA, K., ELKASHEF, W., ZAGHLOUL, H., GILANY, A. H. E. (2017). Does steatosis affect the performance of diffusion-weighted MRI values for fibrosis evaluation in patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 4?. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4, 283–288. https://ajindex.com/articles/411071

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Alter MJ. Epidemiology of hepatitis C infection. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 13: 2436-41
  2. Afdhal NH, Nunes D. Evaluation of liver fibrosis: a concise review. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 1160-74
  3. Buti M, San Miguel R, Brosa M, et al. Estimating the impact of hepatitis C virus therapy on future liver-related morbidity, mortality and costs related to chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol 2005; 42: 639- 45
  4. Rousselet MC, Michalak S, Dupré F, et al. Sources of variability in histological scoring of chronic viral hepatitis. Hepatology 2005; 41: 257-64
  5. Kim KA, Park MS, Kim IS, et al. Quantitative evaluation of liver cirrhosis using T1 relaxation time with 3 tesla MRI before and after oxygen inhalation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 36: 405-10
  6. Bonekamp S, Torbenson MS, Kamel IR.Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the staging of liver fibrosis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2011; 45: 885-92
  7. Razek AA, Abdalla A, Omran E, Fathy A, Zalata K. Diagnosis and quantification of hepatic fibrosis in children with diffusion weighted MR imaging. Eur J Radiol 2011; 78: 129-34
  8. Bakan AA, Inci E, Bakan S, Gokturk S, Cimilli T. Utility of diffusionweighted imaging in the evaluation of liver fibrosis. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 682-7
  9. Razek AA, Khashaba M, Abdalla A, Bayomy M, Barakat T. Apparent diffusion coefficient value of hepatic fibrosis and inflammation in children with chronic hepatitis. Radiol Med 2014; 119: 903-9
  10. Fischer HP, Willsch E, Bierhoff E, Pfeifer U. Histopathologic findings in chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol 1996; 24: 35-42
  11. Goodman ZD, Ishak KG. Histopathology of hepatitis C virus infection. Semin Liver Dis 1995; 15: 70-81
  12. Huang H, Sun F, Owen DM, et al. Hepatitis C virus production by human hepatocytes dependent on assembly and secretion of very low-density lipoproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104: 5848-53
  13. Kapadia SB, Chisari FV. Hepatitis C virus RNA replication is regulated by host geranylgeranylation and fatty acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 2561-6
  14. Asselah T, Rubbia-Brandt L, Marcellin P, Negro F. Steatosis in chronic hepatitis C: why does it really matter? Gut 2006; 55: 123- 30
  15. American Diabetes Association. Report of the Expert Committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. American Diabetes Association: Clinical Practice Recommendations Committee Report. Diabetes Care 2000; 2000: S4-S19
  16. Elahi E, Pourmand N, Chaung R, et al. Determination of hepatitis C virus genotype