Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2017 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4

Significance of selected morphological and histopathological parameters of colon tumors as prognostic factors of cancer spread

Pages
248–253
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mesenteric location of the tumor is predisposed to lymphatic spread, whereas the antimesenteric location predicts hematogenous spread

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/Aims: The identification of prognostic factors of metastatic development is one of the most important issues in colorectal cancer (CRC) research.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: To identify potential predictors of CRC spread, we analyzed data of 191 patients who had undergone surgery for colon tumors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mesenteric location of the tumor is predisposed to lymphatic spread, whereas the antimesenteric location predicts hematogenous spread
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background/Aims: The identification of prognostic factors of metastatic development is one of the most important issues in colorectal cancer (CRC) research. The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of colon tumor characteristics, including location, circumferential location, histological type, and histological grade, as predictors of metastases. Materials and Methods: To identify potential predictors of CRC spread, we analyzed data of 191 patients who had undergone surgery for colon tumors. We searched for potential associations between the location in the right or left colon, circumferential location, histological type, and histological grade (G-parameter) of colon tumors and the incidence of lymph node and distal metastases. The analysis was based on Pearson’s chi-square (χ2) test with a statistical significance of p<0.05. Results: Lymph node metastases were found in 100 patients, including 44 patients with synchronous liver metastases. Lymph node involvement was detected in 43 (52.4%) patients with right-sided and in 57 (52.3%) patients with left-sided tumors (p=0.984). Liver metastases were detected in 19 (23.17%) patients with rightsided colon tumors and in 25 (22.9%) patients with left-sided tumors (p=0.969). Lymph node and liver metastases were found in 60 (47.6%) and 24 (19.0%) patients with annular tumors, respectively (p=NS), and these were found on the mesenteric side in 75.0% (n=30) and 20.0% (n=8) patients (p=0.004) and on the antimesenteric side in 47.6% (n=10) and 48.0% (n=12) patients (p=0.044), respectively. Conclusion: The circumferential location of primary colon tumors is a significant predictor of their metastatic potential. The mesenteric location of the tumor is predisposed to lymphatic spread, whereas the antimesenteric location predicts hematogenous spread

🔖

Cite This Article

KAMOCKİ, Z. K., WODY?SKA, N. A., ?URAWSKA, J. L., ZAR?BA, K. P. (2017). Significance of selected morphological and histopathological parameters of colon tumors as prognostic factors of cancer spread. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4, 248–253. https://ajindex.com/articles/411070

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Didkowska J, U W. Malignant neoplasmas in Poland. Polish National Cancer Registry Oncology. Centre - Institute of Maria Sklodowska - Curie, 2013
  2. Ferlay J, Soerjomatoran J, Evik M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015; 136: 359-86
  3. Marzouk O, Schofield J. Review of histopathological and molecular prognostic features in colorectal cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2011; 3: 2767-810
  4. Compton C, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Pettigrew N, Fielding LP. American Joint Committee on Cancer Prognostic Factors Consensus Conference: Colorectal Working Group. Cancer 2000; 88: 1739-57
  5. Li M, Li JY, Zhao AL, et al. Comparison of carcinoembryonic antigen prognostic value in serum and tumour tissue of patients with colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11: 276-81
  6. Amri R, Bordeianou LG, Berger DL. Effect of high-grade disease on outcomes of surgically treated colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23: 1157-63
  7. Worthley DL, Whitehall VL, Spring KJ, Leggett BA. Colorectal carcinogenesis: road maps to cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13: 3784-91
  8. Kodeda K, Asting AG, Lönnroth C, et al. Genomic CGH-assessed structural DNA alterations in rectal carcinoma as related to local recurrence following primary operation for cure. Int J Oncol 2012; 41: 1397-404
  9. Bentzen SM, Balslev I, Pedersen M, et al. Time to loco-regional recurrence after resection of Dukes' B and C colorectal cancer with or without adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy. A multivariate regression analysis. Br J Cancer 1992; 65: 102-7
  10. Wu ZY, Wan J, Li JH, et al. Prognostic value of lateral lymph node metastasis for advanced low rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13: 6048-52
  11. Kee F, Wilson RH, Gilliland R, Sloan JM, Rowlands BJ, Moorehead RJ. Changing site distribution of colorectal cancer. BMJ 1992; 305: 158
  12. Erkek B, Ozkan N, Bayar S, et al. Subsite distribution of colorectal carcinoma and implications for screening; a retrospective audit of 1771 cases. Hepatogastroenterology 2007; 54: 77-80
  13. Golematis BC, Tzardis PJ, Al Ahwal J, Charitopoulos N, Peveretos P. Site distribution of carcinoma of the large intestine. Retrospective study of 600 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1989; 32: 14-6
  14. Derwinger K, Gustavsson B. Variations in demography and prognosis by colon cancer location. Anticancer Res 2011; 31: 2347-50
  15. Li FY, Lai MD. Colorectal cancer, one entity or three. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2009; 10: 219-29