Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2004 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

Akut varis kanaması için özofagus varis ligasyonu: 3 yıllık takip sonuçları

Esophageal variceal ligation for acute variceal bleeding: Results of three years' follow-up

Pages
27–33
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, endoscopic variceal ligation had a lower rate of rebleeding and of development of fundal gastric varices, but high portal hypertensive gastropathy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Endoscopic variceal ligation is widely accepted as the optimum endoscopic treatment for esophageal variceal hemorrhage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These patients received regular follow-up and detailed clinical assessment of at least 24 months.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, endoscopic variceal ligation had a lower rate of rebleeding and of development of fundal gastric varices, but high portal hypertensive gastropathy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Karaciğer sirozu · Özofageal ve gastrik varisler · Bağlama

Abstract

Endoscopic variceal ligation is widely accepted as the optimum endoscopic treatment for esophageal variceal hemorrhage. However, the rebleeding course and long-term outcome of patients with esophageal variceal hemorrhage after ligation have been poorly defined. Therefore, we conducted a long-term follow-up study to delineate the outcome of ligation. Methods: Twenty-one liver cirrhotic patients with endoscopically proven esophageal variceal hemorrhage were treated by endoscopic variceal ligation. These patients received regular follow-up and detailed clinical assessment of at least 24 months. Results: Twenty-one eligible patients were followed up for a mean of 44.45 months (range 33.5-64 months). The mean number of sessions required to obtain eradication was 3.57±1.99 (range 1-8). Esophageal varices could be obliterated within 11.57±6.8 weeks (range 3-30). The percentage of variceal recurrence during follow-up was 57.14% (12/21) after endoscopic variceal ligation. Recurrence were observed in a mean of 34 months (median 29 months). Rebleeding from esophageal varices appeared in four patients (19.04%). The appearance rates of portal hypertensive gastropathy and fundal gastric varices after varice obliteration were found to be 45.45% (5/11) and 25% (3/12), respectively. Conclusions: Based on the results of long-term follow-up of endoscopic variceal ligation, although the percentage of variceal recurrence was high, endoscopic ligation achieved variceal obliteration faster and in fewer treatment sessions. Furthermore, endoscopic variceal ligation had a lower rate of rebleeding and of development of fundal gastric varices, but high portal hypertensive gastropathy.

Özet

Endoskopik varis ligasyonu özofagus varis kanaması için optimum endoskopik tedavi olarak yaygın kabul görmektedir. Ancak, ligasyon sonrası özofagus varis kanamalı hastaların yeniden kanama ve uzun süreli takip konusunda yeterince veri azdır. Bu nedenle ligasyonun seytini göstermek için uzun süreli takip çalışması planladık. Yöntem: Endoskopik olarak ispatlanmış özofagus varis kanaması olan ve endoskopik varis ligasyonu ile tedavi edilmiş karaciğer sirozlu yirmi bir hasta çalışmaya alındı. Bu hastalar 24 ay boyunca düzenli olarak takip edildi ve ayrıntılı klinik değerlendirme yapıldı. Bulgular: Uygun 21 hasta 44.45 ay (erim 33.5-64 ay) takip edildi. Eradikasyon sağlamak için gerekli ortalama oturum sayısı 3.57±1.99 (erim 1-8) idi. Özofagus varisi 11.57±6.8 haftada (erim 3-30) oblitere edildi. endoskopik varis ligasyonu sonrası takip sırasında varis nüks oranı %57.14 (12/21) idi. Nüks ortalama 34. ayda (ortanca 29 ay) gözlendi. Özofagus varisinden yeniden kanama 4 hastada (%19.04) görüldü. Varis obliterasyonundan sonra portal hipertansiv gastropati ve fundal varis ortaya çıkma oranı sırasıyla %45.45(5/11) ve %25 (3/12) idi. Sonuç: endoskopik varis ligasyonun uzun süreli takip sonuçlarına göre, varis nüksü oranı yüksek olmasına rağmen; endoskopik ligasyon daha az tedavi oturumunda ve daha hızlı varis obliterasyonu sağladı; ve endoskopik varis ligasyonunun daha az yeniden kanama ve fundal gastrik varis oranı vardı; fakat portal hipertansif gastropati oranı yüksekti.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTINTAŞ, E., SEZGİN, O., KACAR, S., TUNÇ, B., PARLAK, E., ALTIPARMAK, E., SARITAŞ, Ü. (2004). Akut varis kanaması için özofagus varis ligasyonu: 3 yıllık takip sonuçları. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 27–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/410418

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Graham DY, Smith JL. The course of patients after varice al hemorrhage. Gastroenterology 1981; 80: 800-9
  2. Thomsen BL, Moller S, Sorensen TIA. Copenhagen Esop hageal Varices Sclerotherapy Project. Optimized analysis of recurrent bleeding and death in patients with cirrhosis and esophageal varices. J Hepatol 1994; 21: 367-75
  3. D'Amico G, Luca A. Natural history. Clinical-haemodyna- mic correlations. Prediction of the risk of bleeding. Bailli- ere's Clinical Gastroenterology 1997; 11(2): 243-55
  4. Binmoeller KF, Borsatto R. Variceal bleeding and portal hypertension. Endoscopy 2000; 32(3): 189-99
  5. De Franchis R. Updating consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno III consensus workshop on definitions, methodology and therapeutic strategies in portal hyperten sion. J Hepatol 2000; 33: 846-52
  6. Burroughs AK. Pharmacological treatment of acute varice al bleeding. Digestion 1998; 59 (Suppl): 28-36
  7. Steigmann GV, Cambre T, Sun JH. A new endoscopic elas tic band ligation device. Gastrointest Endosc 1986; 32: 230- 3
  8. Roberts L, Kamath PS. Pathophysiology and treatment of variceal hemorrhage. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 1996; 71: 973-83
  9. De Franchis R, Primignani M. Endoscopic treatments for portal hypertension. Bailliere's Clinical Gastroenterology 1997; 11: 289-309
  10. Lo G, Lai K, Cheng J. A prospective, randomized trial of sclerotherapy versus ligation in the management of ble eding esophageal varices. Hepatology 1995; 22: 466-71
  11. Laine L, Cook D. Endoscopic ligation compared with scle rotherapy for treatment of esophageal variceal bleeding. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123: 280-7
  12. Shahi H, Sarin S. Prevention of first variceal bleed: an app raisal of current therapies. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93: 2348-58
  13. Sarin S, Lamba G, Kumar M, et al. Comparison of endosco pic ligation and propranolol for the primary prevention of variceal bleeding. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 988-93
  14. Stanley AJ, Hayes PC. Portal hypertension and variceal haemorrhage. Lancet 1997; 350: 1235-9
  15. D'Amico G, Pagliaro L, Bosch J. The treatment of portal hypertension: a meta-analytic review. Hepatology 1995; 22: 332-54
  16. Stiegmann GV, Goff JS, Michaletz-Onody PA, et al. Endos copic sclerotherapy as compared with endoscopic ligation for bleeding esophageal varices. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 1527-32
  17. Laine L, El-Newihi HM, Migikowsky B, et al. Endoscopic li gation compared with sclerotherapy for the treatment of bleeding esophageal varices. Ann Intern Med