Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3

Mutatis mutandis: Are we diagnosing too many people with non-celiac gluten sensitivity? Multiple case report

Pages
319–322
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This method should be recommended when gluten-related disorders are suspected in order to reduce the inappropriate diagnosis of NCGS.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We report three patients presenting with gluten-related signs and symptoms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since villous height/crypt depth ratio, intraepithelial lymphocyte count, and serum antibody tests were not diagnostic for celiac disease (CD), a diagnosis of non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) was suggested.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This method should be recommended when gluten-related disorders are suspected in order to reduce the inappropriate diagnosis of NCGS.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

We report three patients presenting with gluten-related signs and symptoms. Since villous height/crypt depth ratio, intraepithelial lymphocyte count, and serum antibody tests were not diagnostic for celiac disease (CD), a diagnosis of non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) was suggested. On the other hand, antibodies suggestive for CD surprisingly showed positive results in the duodenal biopsy organ culture of all three cases. The reported cases suggest the precious potential role that organ culture systems may play in differentiating CD from NCGS. This method should be recommended when gluten-related disorders are suspected in order to reduce the inappropriate diagnosis of NCGS.

🔖

Cite This Article

BORGHİNİ, R., DONATO, G., TOLA, M. D., ISONNE, C., PİCARELLİ, A. (2014). Mutatis mutandis: Are we diagnosing too many people with non-celiac gluten sensitivity? Multiple case report. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3, 319–322. https://ajindex.com/articles/410272

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Aziz I, Sanders DS. Are we diagnosing too many people with co- eliac disease? Proc Nutr Soc 2012; 71: 538-44. [CrossRef] Rubio-Tapia A, Hill ID, Kelly CP, et al. American College of Gastro- enterology. ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 656-76. [CrossRef] Picarelli A, Di Tola M, Marino M, et al. Usefulness of the organ cul- ture system when villous height/crypt depth ratio, intraepithelial lymphocyte count, or serum antibody tests are not diagnostic for celiac disease. Transl Res 2013; 161: 172-80. [CrossRef] Picarelli A, Di Tola M, Borghini R, et al. Colonic involvement in celiac disease and possible implications of the sigmoid mucosa organ culture in its diagnosis. J Clin Immunol 2013 33: 1250-6. [CrossRef] Vetrano S, Zampaletta U, Anania MC, et al. Detection of anti- endomysial and anti-tissue transglutaminase autoantibodies in media following culture of oral biopsies from patients with un- treated coeliac disease. Dig Liver Dis 2007; 39: 911-6. [CrossRef] Volta U, Tovoli F, Cicola R, et al. Serological tests in gluten sensitiv- ity (nonceliac gluten intolerance). J Clin Gastroenterol 2012; 46: 680-5. [CrossRef] Bizzaro N, Tozzoli R, Villalta D, Fabris M, Tonutti E. Cutting-edge issues in celiac disease and in gluten intolerance. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2012; 42: 279-87. [CrossRef] Inomata N. Wheat allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2009; 9: 238-43. [CrossRef] Mooney PD, Aziz I, Sanders DS. Non-celiac gluten sensitivity: clini- cal relevance and recommendations for future research. Neuro- gastroenterol Motil 2013 25: 864-71. [CrossRef] Aziz I, Hadjivassiliou M, Sanders DS. Does gluten sensitivity in the absence of coeliac disease exist? BMJ 2012; 345: e7907. [CrossRef] Leffler DA, Schuppan D. Update on serologic testing in celiac dis- ease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010; 105: 2520-4. [CrossRef]