Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3

The sensitivity of MR colonography using dark lumen technique for detection of colonic lesions

Pages
271–278
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Future investigation will likely lead to wider acceptance of this method to detect colonic pathologies, including perhaps their use in colon cancer screening programs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/Aims: To assess the detectability of the lesions with magnetic resonance (MR) colonography using dark lumen technique that had been detected on conventional colonoscopy.Materials and Methods: A total of 38 patients who were suspected to have a colorectal mass between April 2008 and June 2010 were included in this prospective study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Then, axial T2 true- fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP), axial T2 half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE), diffusion-weighted images, and T1 vibe fat suppression coronal sequences were obtained.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Future investigation will likely lead to wider acceptance of this method to detect colonic pathologies, including perhaps their use in colon cancer screening programs.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background/Aims: To assess the detectability of the lesions with magnetic resonance (MR) colonography using dark lumen technique that had been detected on conventional colonoscopy.Materials and Methods: A total of 38 patients who were suspected to have a colorectal mass between April 2008 and June 2010 were included in this prospective study. Warm tap water was administered via a rectal tube to the patients in prone position. Then, axial T2 true- fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP), axial T2 half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE), diffusion-weighted images, and T1 vibe fat suppression coronal sequences were obtained. T1 vibe fat suppression sequences on axial coronal planes were repeated after gadolinium contrast medium intravenous injection. MR images were analyzed by two radiologists concurrently. Assessments were done by comparing with conventional colonoscopy and histopathologic findings.Results: Thirteen out of 20 lesions that had been detected on conventional colonoscopy were correctly obtained by MR colonography. None of the three lesions 5 mm or below was seen on MR colonography. Two out of 4 lesions measuring 6-9 mm were seen on MR colonography (50%). Eleven out of 13 lesions 10 mm and above were correctly detected on MR colonography (84.6%). Sensitivity was estimated as 65% when all lesions were evaluated together.Conclusion: MR colonography has a high sensitivity in the diagnosis of colonic pathologies without ionizing radiation. Future investigation will likely lead to wider acceptance of this method to detect colonic pathologies, including perhaps their use in colon cancer screening programs.

🔖

Cite This Article

ACAY, M. B., BAYRAMOĞLU, S., ACAY, A. (2014). The sensitivity of MR colonography using dark lumen technique for detection of colonic lesions. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3, 271–278. https://ajindex.com/articles/410267

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ, Waye JD, et al. Risk and surveillance of individuals with colorectal polyps. WHO Collaborating Centre for the prevention of colorectal cancer. Bull World Health Organ 1990; 68: 789-95.
  2. Toribara NW, Sleisenger MH. Screening for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 861-7. [CrossRef] Ransohoff DF, Sandler RS. Clinical practise: Screening for colorec- tal cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 40-4. [CrossRef] Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Muray T, et al. Cancer statistics, 2004. CA Can- cer J Clin 2004; 54: 8-29. [CrossRef] Muto T, Bussey HJ, Morson BC. The evolution of cancer of the co- lon and rectum. Cancer 1975; 36: 2251-70. [CrossRef] Aldridge AJ, Simson JN. Histological assessment of colorectal adenomas by size: Are polyps less than 10 mm in size clinically important? Eur J Surg 2001; 167: 777-81. [CrossRef] Winawer SJ. Natural history of colorectal cancer. Am J Med 1999;106: 3-6. [CrossRef] Geenen RW, Hussain SM, Cademartiri F, Poley JW, Siersema PD, Krestin GP. CT and MR colonography: Scanning technigues, post- processing and emphasis on polyp detection. Radiographics 2004; 24: e18. [CrossRef] Luboldt W, Fletcher JG, Vogl TJ. Colonography: Current status, re- search directions and challenges: update 2002. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 502-24. [CrossRef] Towler BP, Irwing L, Glasziou P, Kewenter J, Weller D, Silagy C. A sys- tematic review of the effects of screening for colorectal cancer us- ing the feacal occult blood test, hemoccult. BMJ 1998; 317: 559-65. [CrossRef] Mandel JS; Bond JH, Church TR, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 1365-71. [CrossRef] Anderson ML, Heigh RI, McCoy GA, et al. Accuracy of assessment of the extent of examination by experienced colonoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc 1992; 38: 560-3. [CrossRef] Detsky AS. Screening for colon cancer: Can we afford colonoscopy?(editorial). N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 607-8. [CrossRef] Byers T, Levin B, Rothenberger D, Dodd GD, Smith RA. American Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: Update 1997. CA. Can- cer J Clin 1997; 47: 154-60. [CrossRef] Johnson CD, Dackman AH. CT colonography: The text colon- screening examination. Radiology 2000; 216: 331-41. [CrossRef] Liebermann DA, Smith FW. Screening for colon malignancy with colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 1991; 86: 946-51.
  3. Marshall JB, Barthel JS. The frequency of total colonoscopy and terminal ileal i