Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2015 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2

A functional study of the esophagus in patients with non-cardiac chest pain and dysphagia

Pages
99–103
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, these patients may need more-detailed diagnostic studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/Aims: Nutcracker esophagus and non-specific motility disorders are the main causes of non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP), with gastroesophageal reflux in 60% of cases.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The goal of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of esophageal body and lower esophageal sphincter motor abnormalities in patients with dysphagia, NCCP, or both.Materials and Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of 716 patients with NCCP and/or dysphagia tested between January 1994 and December 2010. 1023 functional studies were performed, 707 of which were esophageal manometries, 225 esophageal pH-meters, and 44 bilimetries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, these patients may need more-detailed diagnostic studies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background/Aims: Nutcracker esophagus and non-specific motility disorders are the main causes of non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP), with gastroesophageal reflux in 60% of cases. Achalasia and diffuse esophageal spasm are the most frequent anomalies described in patients with dysphagia. The goal of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of esophageal body and lower esophageal sphincter motor abnormalities in patients with dysphagia, NCCP, or both.Materials and Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of 716 patients with NCCP and/or dysphagia tested between January 1994 and December 2010. 1023 functional studies were performed, 707 of which were esophageal manometries, 225 esophageal pH-meters, and 44 bilimetries. We divided the patients into three groups: group 1 was composed of patients affected with dysphagia, group 2 with NCCP and group 3 with NCCP and dysphagia.Results: Manometric anomalies were detected in 84.4% of cases (p<0.001). The most frequent esophageal motility alteration was achalasia (36%). The lower esophageal sphincter was normal in 45.9% of patients (p<0.001). In all 3 groups, 80.9%, 98.8%, and 93.8, respectively, of patients showed normal upper esophageal sphincter (p=0.005). Conclusion: Our data differs from those of other studies because they were collected from and analyzed by a single tertiary level referral center by a single examiner. This could have eliminated the variability found in different hands and different experiences. The high percentage of symptomatic patients with non-pathologic esophageal motility pattern suggests an unclear origin of the disease, with possible neuromuscular involvement. As a result, these patients may need more-detailed diagnostic studies.

🔖

Cite This Article

GULLO, R., INVİATİ, A., ALMASİO, P. L., PAOLA, V. D., GİOVANNİ, S. D., SCERRİNO, G., GULOTTA, G., BONVENTRE, S. (2015). A functional study of the esophagus in patients with non-cardiac chest pain and dysphagia. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2, 99–103. https://ajindex.com/articles/410247

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Spieker M. Evaluating dysphagia. Am Acad Fam Physicians 2000; 61: 3639-48. Bass N. The neurology of swallowing. In: Graher M, ed. Dyspha- gia: diagnosis and management. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heine- mann; 1997.p.7-36.
  2. Ruth M, Månsson I, Sandberg N. The prevalence of symptoms suggestive of esophageal disorders. Scand J Gastroenterol 1991; 26: 73-81. [CrossRef] Dysphagia. In: Griffith's 5 Minute Clinical Consult 2006 (For PDA). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams&Wilkins; 2006.
  3. Galmiche JP, Clouse RE, Bálint A, et al. Functional esophageal dis- orders. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 1459-65. [CrossRef] Greenslade J, Wyman A. Investigation of dysphagia. Surgery (Ox- ford) 2006; 24: 89-92. [CrossRef] Fass R. Approach to the patient with dysphagia. (UpToDate 2003) Available from: www.uptodateonline.com Dekel R, Pearson T, Wendel C, De Garmo P, Fennerty MB, Fass R. Assessment of oesophageal motor function in patients with dys- phagia or chest pain - the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative experience. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;18:1083-9. [CrossRef] Fass R, Achem SR. Noncardiac chest pain: Epidemiology, natural course and pathogenesis. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 17: 110-23. [CrossRef] Eslick GD, Talley NJ. Non-cardiac chest pain: Squeezing the life out of Australian healthcare system? Med J Aust 2000; 173: 233-4.
  4. Stahl WG, Beton RR, Johnson CS, Brown CL, Waring JP. Diagnosis and treatment of patients with gastroesophageal reflux and non- cardiac chest pain. South Med J 1994; 87: 739-42. [CrossRef] DeMeester TR, O'Sullivan GC, Bermudez G, Midell AI, Cimochows- ki GE, O'Drobinak J. Esophageal function in patients with angi- na-type chest pain and normal coronary angiograms. Ann Surg 1982; 196: 488-98. [CrossRef] Katz PO, Dalton CB, Richter JE, Wu WC, Castell DO. Esophageal testing of patients with noncardiac chest pain or dysphagia. Re- sults of three years' experience with 1161 patients. Ann Intern Med 1987; 106: 593-7. [CrossRef] Patti MG, Gorodner MV, Galvani C, Tedesco P, Fisichella PM, Os- troff JW et al. Spectrum of esophageal motility disorders: impli- cations for diagnosis and treatment. Arch Surg 2005; 140: 442-9. [CrossRef] Richter JE. Oesophageal motility disorders. Lancet 2001; 358: 823-8. [CrossRef] Caldwell MT, Byrne PJ, Brazil N, Crowley V, Attwood SE, Walsh TN. An ambulatory bile re¯ux monitoring system: An in vitro appraisal. Physiol Meas 1994; 15: 57-65. [CrossRef] Verdu EF, Fraser R, Murphy GM, Blum AL, Armstrong D. The origin of nocturnal i