Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2016 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2

Study of ideal topical pharyngeal anesthesia in upper gastrointestinal system endoscopy: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial

Pages
103–107
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Lidocaine gel and spray combination is the most ideal pharyngeal anesthesia to ensure the adaptation of the patient to the procedure and to decrease anxiety and discomfort during the procedure

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/Aims: This study is designed to determine which drug forms provide ideal pharyngeal anesthesia when used during upper gastrointestinal system endoscopy.Materials and Methods: A total of 180 patients were included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Group 1, lidocaine gel+isotonic spray; Group 2, base lubricant gel+lidocaine spray; and Group 3: lidocaine gel+lidocaine spray.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Lidocaine gel and spray combination is the most ideal pharyngeal anesthesia to ensure the adaptation of the patient to the procedure and to decrease anxiety and discomfort during the procedure
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background/Aims: This study is designed to determine which drug forms provide ideal pharyngeal anesthesia when used during upper gastrointestinal system endoscopy.Materials and Methods: A total of 180 patients were included in the study. Using the random number table, these patients were divided into three groups. Group 1, lidocaine gel+isotonic spray; Group 2, base lubricant gel+lidocaine spray; and Group 3: lidocaine gel+lidocaine spray. Data were collected from the patient identification form, compliance to operation form, and State Anxiety Inventory. Results: Anesthetization and compliance to procedure scores were higher and anxiety scores were lower in Group 3 than in other groups (p<0.05). It was observed that as the compliance score increased, the anesthetization and satisfaction scores also increased; however, coughing during the procedure, duration of the procedure, and anxiety scores decreased (p<0.05). It was determined that as anesthetization scores increased, discomfort in the throat caused by the device, coughing during the procedure, and anxiety scores decreased (p<0.05). Conclusion: Lidocaine gel and spray combination is the most ideal pharyngeal anesthesia to ensure the adaptation of the patient to the procedure and to decrease anxiety and discomfort during the procedure

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAM, H., PEHLİVAN, S., DAĞ, M. S., YILMAZ, N., DEMİR, U., GÜLŞEN, M. T. (2016). Study of ideal topical pharyngeal anesthesia in upper gastrointestinal system endoscopy: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2, 103–107. https://ajindex.com/articles/410218

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Daneshmend TK, Bell GD, Logan RF. Sedation for upper gastroin- testinal endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey. Gut 1991; 32: 12-5. [CrossRef] Keeffe EB, O'Connor KW. 1989 A/S/G/E survey of endoscopic se- dation and monitoring practices. Gastrointest Endosc 1990; 36: 13-8.
  2. Ristikankare M, Hartikainen J, Heikkinen M, Julkunen R. Is routine sedation or topical pharyngeal anesthesia beneficial during up- per endoscopy? Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 686-94. [CrossRef] Fleischer D. Monitoring for conscious sedation: perspective of the gastrointestinal endoscopist. Gastrointest Endosc 1990; 36: 19-22.
  3. Hedenbro JL, Ekelund M, Jansson O, Lindblom A. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate topical anes- thesia of the pharynx in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. En- doscopy 1992; 24: 585-7. [CrossRef] Soma Y, Saito H, Kishibe T, Takahashi T, Tanaka H, Munakata A. Evaluation of topical pharyngeal anesthesia for upper endoscopy including factors associated with patient tolerance. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 14-8. [CrossRef] Evans LT, Saberi S, Kim HM, Elta GH, Schoenfeld P. Pharyngeal anesthe- sia during sedated EGDs: is "the spray" beneficial? A meta-analysis and systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 761-6. [CrossRef] Amornyotin S, Srikureja W, Chalayonnavin W, Kongphlay S, Chatchawankitkul S. Topical viscous lidocaine solution versus li- docaine spray for pharyngeal anesthesia in unsedated esopha- gogastroduodenoscopy. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 581-6. [CrossRef] Waring JP, Baron TH, Hirota WK, et al. Guidelines for conscious se- dation and monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gas- trointest Endosc 2003; 58: 317-22. [CrossRef] Ayoub C, Skoury A, Abdul-Baki H, Nasr V, Soweid A. Lidocaine lollipop as single-agent anesthesia in upper GI endoscopy. Gas- trointest Endosc 2007; 66: 786-93. [CrossRef] Öner N, Le Compte A. State/Trait Anxiety Inventory Handbook (in Turkish, Süreksiz Durumluk/Sürekli Kaygı Envanteri El Kitabı). İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları; 1985. de la Morena F, Santander C, Esteban C, et al. Usefulness of ap- plying lidocaine in esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed under sedation with propofol. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 5: 231-9. [CrossRef] McQuaid KR, Laine L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of ran- domized, controlled trials of moderate sedation for routine endo- scopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 910-23. [CrossRef] Amornyotin S. Sedation-related complications in gastroint