Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2018 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 6

To understand or not to understand: This is the problem

Pages
642–649
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The Cloze Test Procedure might be used in examining problematic consent forms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/Aims: The aim of the study was to evaluate the level of readability of the informed consent used before colonoscopy in auniversity hospital by different methods, and to investigate related sociodemographic variables.Materials and Methods: This descriptive, cross-sectional study included 211 subjects aged over 18.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Three different measurement toolswere used to evaluate the level of readability of the informed consent: The Cloze Readability Procedure, the Flesch’s readability formulaadapted to Turkish by Atesman, and the readability formula developed by Cetinkaya and Uzun.Results: The readability scores of the text, calculated according to Atesman’s formula, the Cetinkaya-Uzun, and Cloze ReadabilityProcedure were 50.183 (the average level of difficulty), 31.021 (frustration level), and 26.68 (frustration level), respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The Cloze Test Procedure might be used in examining problematic consent forms.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background/Aims: The aim of the study was to evaluate the level of readability of the informed consent used before colonoscopy in auniversity hospital by different methods, and to investigate related sociodemographic variables.Materials and Methods: This descriptive, cross-sectional study included 211 subjects aged over 18. Three different measurement toolswere used to evaluate the level of readability of the informed consent: The Cloze Readability Procedure, the Flesch’s readability formulaadapted to Turkish by Atesman, and the readability formula developed by Cetinkaya and Uzun.Results: The readability scores of the text, calculated according to Atesman’s formula, the Cetinkaya-Uzun, and Cloze ReadabilityProcedure were 50.183 (the average level of difficulty), 31.021 (frustration level), and 26.68 (frustration level), respectively. The informedconsent was found to be appropriate for individuals educated at the grade level 10 and above. The following participants were found tohave significantly higher scores: educated above high school; reading books, magazines, digital media, and printed media every day orevery other day; and previously informed about colonoscopy.Conclusion: Within the framework of a colon cancer screening program conducted by the Public Health Institution of Turkey, individualswho tested positive were subjected to the colonoscopy procedure, if necessary. This increases the importance of the informed consent formused prior to the colonoscopy procedure. The patients and/or patients’ relatives who are at the frustration level of reading ability wouldhave problems in reading and comprehending the text. The Cloze Test Procedure might be used in examining problematic consent forms.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAN, M. N., LİMNİLİ, G., YILDIRIM, E., GÜLDAL, A. D. (2018). To understand or not to understand: This is the problem. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 6, 642–649. https://ajindex.com/articles/410128

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. McWhinney IR, Freeman T, editors. Textbook of Family Medicine. 3th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009. Peltzer-Karpf A. The dynamic landscape of exceptional language development. Strabismus 2012; 20: 69-73. [CrossRef] TTB-UDEK Etik Çalışma Grubu. Uzmanlık dernekleri için etik kılavuzlar (Aydınlatılmış Onam). Available at: https://www.ttb.org. tr/kutuphane/etik_klavuzlar.pdf. Connelly JE. Informed consent. An improved perspective. Arch Intern Med 1988; 148: 1266-8. [CrossRef] Hansberry DR, Agarwal N, Gonzales SF, Baker SR. Are we effectively informing patients? A quantitative analysis of on-line patient education resources from the American Society of Neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014; 35: 1270-5. [CrossRef] Kose EO. Biyoloji 9 ders kitabında hücre ile ilgili metinlerin okunabilirlik düzeyleri. Cankaya University Journal of Arts and Sciences 2009; 12: 141-50.
  2. Karatay H, Bolat KK, Gungor H. The readability and understandability of the texts in the course books of Turkish language courses. JASSS 2013; 6: 603-23. [CrossRef] Boztas N, Ozbilgin S, Ocmen E, et al. Evaluating the readibility of informed consent forms available before anaesthesia: a comparative study. Turk J Anaesth Reanim 2014; 42: 140-4. [CrossRef] Ertem-Vehid H, Giresunlu M, Koksalan H. Evaluation of patients’ inform consent forms in oncology: readability of the information. Turk J Oncol 2006; 21: 187-90.
  3. Eker L, Tüzün EH, Aytar A, Daşkapan A. Readability levels of health education materials used in physical therapy and rehabilitation clinic. Rehabil 2013; 24: 93-8.
  4. Inci FH, Koştu N, Ozen-Çınar I, Korkmaz-Aslan G, Kartal A. The readability and design of health education materials. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi 2016; 18: 28-39. Taylor W. Cloze procedure: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly 1953; 30: 415-33. [CrossRef] Miller MJ, DeWitt JE, McCleeary EM, O’Keefe KJ. Application of the cloze procedure to evaluate comprehension and demonstrate rewriting of pharmacy educational materials. Ann Pharmacother 2009; 43: 650-7. [CrossRef] Ateşman E. Türkçede okunabilirliğin ölçülmesi. A.Ü. TÖMER Dil Dergisi 1997; 58: 171-4. Çetinkaya G. Türkçe Metinlerin Okunabilirlik Düzeylerinin Tanımlanması Ve Sınıflandırılması. A.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi. 2010.
  5. Kusec S, Oreskovic S, Skegro M, Korolija D, Busic Z, Horzic M. Improving comprehension of informed consent. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 60: 294-300. [CrossRef] Kaya N, Kaya H. A determining of t