Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2018 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4

Physicians’ attitude and perception regarding celiac disease: A questionnaire-based study

Pages
419–426
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, 69.9% of the physicians questioned considered CD as a rare disorder.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/Aims: Despite its high prevalence, affecting about 1% of the general population, celiac disease (CD) remains heavily un-derdiagnosed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: An 18-items questionnaire pointing out general features, clinical presentation, diagnosis and management of CD patients was addressed to physicians from different medical specialties, in training or board-certified, from one universitary center.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, 69.9% of the physicians questioned considered CD as a rare disorder.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background/Aims: Despite its high prevalence, affecting about 1% of the general population, celiac disease (CD) remains heavily un-derdiagnosed. Among the reasons for underdiagnosis, awareness among medical professionals has been little studied. The aim of this survey was to determine physicians’ knowledge in regard to CD in adult patients. Materials and Methods: An 18-items questionnaire pointing out general features, clinical presentation, diagnosis and management of CD patients was addressed to physicians from different medical specialties, in training or board-certified, from one universitary center. Results: Altogether 153 physicians were invited to complete the survey (69.3% female, 35.9% gastroenterologists). Overall, 69.9% of the physicians questioned considered CD as a rare disorder. Lymphoma increased risk was highlighted in significant higher proportion by gastroenterologists when compared with physicians of other medical specialty. Chronic diarrhea, weight loss, iron-deficiency ane-mia, and abdominal pain were the first four conditions recognized as associated with CD, by 94.1%, 76.5%, 61.4%, and 54.2% study participants, respectively. About one-third of respondents (34.5%) affirmed to perform total serum IgA testing in all patients tested for CD. Intestinal biopsy confirmation of a positive celiac serology was reported by 65.4% physicians, with a higher proportion among gas-troenterologists: 81.5% versus 56.6%. In regard to CD management, both groups concluded that referral to specialized centers should be recommended. Conclusion: This study highlights poor awareness among the physicians’ in regard to important CD features and diagnostic recommenda-tions in adult patients. More efforts are warranted to improve awareness on CD features among physicians of different medical specialties.

🔖

Cite This Article

JINGA, M., POPP, A., BALABAN, D. V., DİMA, A., JURCUT, C. (2018). Physicians’ attitude and perception regarding celiac disease: A questionnaire-based study. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4, 419–426. https://ajindex.com/articles/410104

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Rubio-Tapia A, Hill ID, Kelly CP, Calderwood AH, Murray JA. American College of Gastroenterology. ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 656-76.
  2. Ludvigsson JF, Bai JC, Biagi F, et al. Diagnosis and management of adult coeliac disease: guidelines from the British Society of Gastro- enterology Gut 2014; 63: 1210-28.
  3. Menardo G, Brizzolara R, Bonassi S, et al. Population screening for coeliac disease in a low prevalence area in Italy. Scand J Gastroen- terol 2006; 41: 1414-20.
  4. Hin H, Bird G, Fisher P, Mahy N, Jewell D. Coeliac disease in primary care: case finding study. BMJ 1999; 318: 164-7.
  5. Horwitz A, Skaaby T, Kårhus LL, et al. Screening for celiac disease in Danish adults. Scand J Gastroenterol 2015; 50: 824-31.
  6. Lanzarotto F, Crimí F, Amato M, et al. Is under diagnosis of celiac disease compounded by mismanagement in the primary care set ting? A survey in the Italian Province of Brescia. Minerva Gastroen- terol Dietol 2004; 50: 283-8.
  7. Norström F, Lindholm L, Sandström O, et al. Delay to celiac disease diagnosis and its implications for health-related quality of life. BMC Gastroenterol 2011; 11: 118. Ramírez-Cervantes KL, Remes-Troche JM, del Pilar Milke-García M, et al. Characteristics and factors related to quality of life in Mexican Mestizo patients with celiac disease. BMC Gastroenterol 2015; 15: 4. Zipser RD, Farid M, Baisch D, Patel B, Patel D. Physician aware- ness of celiac disease: a need for further education. J Gen Intern Med 2005; 20: 644-6.
  8. Al-Mayouf SM, Alsonbul A, Alismail K. Localized calcinosis in ju- venile dermatomyositis: Successful treatment with intralesional cor- ticosteroids injection. Int J Rheum Dis 2010; 13: 26-9.
  9. Tahiri L, Azzouzi H, Squalli G, Abourazzak F, Harzy T. Celiac dis- ease causing severe osteomalacia: an association still present in Morocco! Pan Afr Med J 2014; 19: 43. Biagi F, Marchese A, Ferretti F, et al. A multicentre case control study on complicated coeliac disease: two different patterns of natu- ral history, two different prognoses. BMC Gastroenterol 2014; 14: 139. Malamut G, Cellier C. Refractory Celiac Disease: Epidemiology and Clinical Manifestations. Dig Dis 2015; 33: 221-6. van Beurden YH, van Gils T, van Gils NA, Kassam Z, Mulder Cj, Aparicio-Pages N. Serendipity in refractory celiac disease: full re- covery of duodenal villi and clinical symptoms after fecal microbiota transfer. J Gastrointest Liver Dis 2016; 25: 385-8.
  10. Malamut G, Cellier C. Com