Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2018 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4

Detection and clinical significance of DNA repair gene ERCC8 tag SNPs in gastric cancer

Pages
392–396
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The results showed that the odds ratio of the different ERCC8 rs158572 and rs158916 genotypes was not significantly in-creased in the observation group compared with that in the control group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/Aims: Excision repair cross-complementing group 8 (ERCC8) is one of the members of the nucleotide excision repair path-way.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to explore the association between ERCC8 tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and gastric cancer.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The results showed that the odds ratio of the different ERCC8 rs158572 and rs158916 genotypes was not significantly in-creased in the observation group compared with that in the control group.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background/Aims: Excision repair cross-complementing group 8 (ERCC8) is one of the members of the nucleotide excision repair path-way. This study aimed to explore the association between ERCC8 tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: Totally, 120 patients with gastric cancer treated from March 2010 to March 2011 were selected as the obser-vation group and 120 healthy individuals were selected as the control group during the same period. The Sequenom MassARRAY system was used to identify genotypes in these samples. The genetic locus of ERCC8 tag SNPs and the relevance of gastric cancer risk to the different ERCC8 genotypes alone or in combination with Helicobacter pylori infection were observed and analyzed. The AA, GA, and GG genotypes on rs158572 and rs158916 in the observation and control groups were compared. Results: The results showed that the odds ratio of the different ERCC8 rs158572 and rs158916 genotypes was not significantly in-creased in the observation group compared with that in the control group. By contrast, in patients with H. pylori infection, the ERCC8 rs158572 GA/GG and rs158916 TT genotypes showed a 7.921-fold and 8.021-fold [95% confidence interval (CI)=4.022-15.921, p=0.029 and 95% CI=3.021-15.092, p=0.021, respectively] increased risk of gastric cancer than the AA and CT/CC genotypes, respectively. Conclusion:Helicobacter pylori infection combined with ERCC8 rs158572 and rs158916 can be used as a predictive index of gastric cancer occurrence.

🔖

Cite This Article

LU, X., CHEN, F., LIU, X., Zİ, Y., YUAN, D., HE, X., ZHU, D. (2018). Detection and clinical significance of DNA repair gene ERCC8 tag SNPs in gastric cancer. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4, 392–396. https://ajindex.com/articles/410103

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2015; 65: 87-108.
  2. Gabitass RF, Annels NE, Stocken DD, Pandha HA, Middleton GW. Elevated myeloid-derived suppressor cells in pancreatic, esophageal and gastric cancer are an independent prognostic factor and are associated with significant elevation of the Th2 cytokine interleu- kin-13. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2011; 60: 1419-30.
  3. Wroblewski LE, Peek RM Jr, Wilson KT. Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer: factors that modulate disease risk. Clin Microbiol Rev 2010; 23: 713-39.
  4. Guggenheim DE, Shah MA. Gastric cancer epidemiology and risk factors. J Surg Oncol 2013; 107: 230-6.
  5. Nobili S, Bruno L, Landini I, et al. Genomic and genetic alterations influence the progression of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 290-9.
  6. Ober C, Vercelli D. Gene-environment interactions in human dis- ease: nuisance or opportunity? Trends Genet 2011; 27: 107-15.
  7. Wang B, Zhou S, Hong F, et al. Association analysis between the tag SNP for sonic hedgehog rs9333613 polymorphism and male sexual orientation. J Androl 2012; 33: 951-4.
  8. Mahdevar G, Zahiri J, Sadeghi M, Nowzari-Dalini A, Ahrabian H. Tag SNP selection via a genetic algorithm. J Biomed Inform 2010; 43: 800-4.
  9. Rajaraman P, Hutchinson A, Wichner S, et al. DNA repair gene polymorphisms and risk of adult meningioma, glioma, and acoustic neuroma. Neuro Oncol 2010; 12: 37-48.
  10. Fang F, Umbach DM, Xu Z, et al. No association between DNA re- pair gene XRCC1 and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol Aging 2010; 33: 1015.e25-6. Goode EL, Ulrich CM, Potter JD. Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and associations with cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark- ers Prev 2002; 11: 1513-30.
  11. Lindahl T, Wood RD. Quality control by DNA repair. Science 1999; 286: 1897-905.
  12. Liu J, Deng N, Xu Q, et al. Polymorphisms of multiple genes in- volved in NER pathway predict prognosis of gastric cancer. Onco- target 2016.
  13. Guillem VM, Cervantes F, Martínez J, et al. XPC genetic polymor- phisms correlate with the response to imatinib treatment in patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Am J Hematol 2010; 85: 482-6.
  14. Fleming ND, Agadjanian H, Nassanian H, et al. Xeroderma pig- mentosum complementation group C single-nucleotide polymor- phisms in the nucleotide excision repair pathway correlate with pro- longed progression-free survival in advanced ovarian cancer. Cancer 2012; 118: 689-97.
  15. Laugel V, Dalloz C, Durand M, et a