Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2018 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

Incidence patterns of colorectal cancers in four countries of the Middle East Cancer Consortium (Cyprus, Jordan, Israel, and İzmir, Turkey) compared with those in the United States Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program

Pages
36–44
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, the need for implementing tailored primary and secondary prevention programs in the region is essential.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/Aims: There are wide variations in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence across the world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Historically, the highest incidence rates have been reported historically in more developed countries; however, increasing trends have been seen in developing countries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, the need for implementing tailored primary and secondary prevention programs in the region is essential.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005-2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background/Aims: There are wide variations in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence across the world. Historically, the highest incidence rates have been reported historically in more developed countries; however, increasing trends have been seen in developing countries. Here, we present the CRC incidence pattern in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, and İzmir, Turkey, which are countries of the Middle East Cancer Consortium (MECC).Materials and Methods: We analyzed 2005-2010 CRC data from population-based registries and calculated crude and age standardized rates for CRC, colon and rectum subsites, and annual percent changes (APCs) for trends.Results: The age-adjusted incidence rates (AAIRs) for CRC were the highest in Israeli Jews (IJ) (46.7 for males and 35.5 for females), which exceeded those of the USA Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) program registries. In both sexes, AAIRs in Cyprus and Israeli Arabs (IA) were close to those in SEER registries. For both sexes, AAIRs in İzmir and Jordan were substantially lower than those in other registries. Statistically significant decreasing trends over time were observed in AAIRs for both sexes in the SEER program (APCs: males, -3.24% and females, -2.54%), whereas the trends varied within the MECC registries. There were decreasing AAIR trends for males in IJ and IA and for females in Cyprus and IJ; APC for females in IJ (-4.29%) was significant. Conversely, increasing trends with the significant APCs were observed in males in İzmir (2.43%) and Jordan (7.57%).Conclusion: MECC countries comprise both high- and low-risk populations for CRCs. However, increasing trends in low-risk populations have been alarming. Thus, the need for implementing tailored primary and secondary prevention programs in the region is essential.

🔖

Cite This Article

ESER, S., CHANG, J., CHAARALAMBOUS, H., SILVERMAN, B., DEMETRIOU, A., YAKUT, C., NIMRI, O., PAVLOU, P., ÖZGÜR, S., ZIOGAS, A., STEVENS, L., WARD, K., ANTON-CULVER, H. (2018). Incidence patterns of colorectal cancers in four countries of the Middle East Cancer Consortium (Cyprus, Jordan, Israel, and İzmir, Turkey) compared with those in the United States Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 36–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/410089

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Pischon T, Boeing H, Hoffmann K, et al. General and abdominal adiposity and risk of death in Europe. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 2105- 29. Mackay J, Amos A. Women and tobacco. Respirology 2003; 8: 123-30. [CrossRef] 28. Barchana M, Colorectal Cancer. In: Freedman LS, Edwards BK, Ries LAG, Young JL (eds). Cancer Incidence in Four Member Coun-tries (Cyprus, Egypt, Israel, and Jordan) of the Middle East Cancer Consortium (MECC) Compared with US SEER. National Cancer In-stitute. NIH Pub. No. 06-5873. 27. Schreuders EH, Ruco A, Rabeneck L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: a global overview of existing programmes. Gut 2015; 64: 1637-49. [CrossRef] 26. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveil-lance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 2008; 58: 130-60. [CrossRef] 25. Espey DK, Wu XC, Swan J, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2004, featuring cancer in American Indians and Alaska Natives. Cancer 2007; 110: 2119-52. [CrossRef] 24. Meissner HI, Breen N, Klabunde CN, Vernon SW. Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006; 15: 389-94. [CrossRef] 23. Farazi PA. Cancer trends and risk factors in Cyprus. Ecancermed-icalscience 2014; 8: 389. 22. Dosemeci M, Hayes RB, Vetter R, et al. Occupational physical ac-tivity, socioeconomic status, and risks of 15 cancer sites in Turkey. Cancer Causes Control 1993; 4: 313-21. [CrossRef] 21. Health 2013,
  2. Israel Ministry of Health, Center for Disease Con-trol. 2014. Health 2013 [Hebrew]. (cited 2015 December 17): Avaible from: URL: http://www.health.gov.il/PublicationsFiles/ health2013. pdf. 20. Arafa MA, Waly MI, Jriesat S, Al Khafajei A, Sallam S. Dietary and lifestyle characteristics of colorectal cancer in Jordan: a case-con-trol study. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev 2011; 12: 1931-36. 19. Lazarou C, Panagiotakos DB, Matalas AL. Level of adherence to the Mediterranean diet among children from Cyprus: The CYKIDS Study. Public Health Nutr 2009; 12: 991-1000. [CrossRef] 18. Arnold M, Sierra MS, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut 2017; 66: 683-91. [CrossRef] 17. Fireman Z, Sandler E, Kopelman Y, Segal A, Sternberg A