Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4

Assessment of surgical resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinomas with multidetector computed tomography: What are the possibilities and problems?

Pages
416–423
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Surgeons should be aware of the limitations of preoperative MDCT

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/Aims: To investigate the accuracy of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in preoperatively determining the surgical resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinomas.Materials and Methods: Multidetector computed tomography, surgery, and pathological results of 274 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were evaluated retrospectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MDCT findings were compared with surgical and pathological findings to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of MDCT in determining surgical resectability.Results: A total of 124 of 274 (56%) patients (83 males, mean age: 60 years) underwent laparoscopy and/or laparotomy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Surgeons should be aware of the limitations of preoperative MDCT
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background/Aims: To investigate the accuracy of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in preoperatively determining the surgical resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinomas.Materials and Methods: Multidetector computed tomography, surgery, and pathological results of 274 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were evaluated retrospectively. MDCT findings were compared with surgical and pathological findings to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of MDCT in determining surgical resectability.Results: A total of 124 of 274 (56%) patients (83 males, mean age: 60 years) underwent laparoscopy and/or laparotomy. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of MDCT in determining the surgical resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinomas were 100%, 72%, 78%, 100%, and 86%, respectively. Liver metastases in 9 cases, peritoneal metastases in 3 cases, and vascular invasion in 5 cases, which were determined during surgery, were not reported by MDCT. On re-review of the MDCT images of these 17 patients, no metastatic lesions could be seen in 9 patients with liver metastases and in 2 of 3 patients with peritoneal metastases. In 1 patient, a peritoneal implant of a diameter of 8 mm was missed on MDCT. There was no vascular invasion according to Lu criteria on the MDCT images in the 5 cases that had vascular invasion in the surgical exploration.Conclusion: The accuracy of MDCT is high in the preoperative determination of surgical resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinomas, but the detection of small liver and peritoneal metastases and accurate determination of vascular invasion are still major problems. Surgeons should be aware of the limitations of preoperative MDCT

🔖

Cite This Article

İŞCANLI, E., CANSEVER, A. T., BOSTANCI, E. B., SAKAOĞULLARI, Z. (2014). Assessment of surgical resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinomas with multidetector computed tomography: What are the possibilities and problems?. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4, 416–423. https://ajindex.com/articles/409622

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Lillemoe KD. Current management of pancreatic carcinoma. Ann Surg 1995
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Balcom JH 4th, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, Chang Y, Fernandez-del Castillo C. Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: Changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg 2001
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Prokesch RW, Schima W, Chow LC, Jeffrey RB. Multidetector CT of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: diagnostic advances and therapeutic relevance. Eur Radiol 2003
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Warshaw AL, Fernández-del Castillo C. Pancreatic carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1992
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Kaneko OF, Lee DM, Wong J, et al. Performance of multidetector computed tomographic angiography in determining surgical resectability of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Soriano A, Castells A, Ayuso C, et al. Preoperative staging and tumor resectability assesment of pancreatic cancer: prospective study comparing endoscopic ultrasonography, helical computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and anjiography. Am J Gastroenterol 2004
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Lu DS, Reber HA, Krasny RM, Kadell BM, Sayre J. Local staging of pancreatic cancer: criteria for unresectability of major vessels as revealed by pancreatic-phase, thin-section helical CT. Am J Roentgenol 1997
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Dunn JA, et al. European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer. Influence of resection margins on survival for patients with pancreatic cancer treated by adjuvant chemoradiation and/or chemotherapy in the ESPAC-1 randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2001
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Park DI, Lee JK, Kim JE, et al. The analysis of resectability and survival in pancreatic cancer patients with vascular invasion. J Clin Gastroenterol 2001
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Valls C, Andia E, Sanchez A, et al. Dual-phase helical CT of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: assesment of respsctability before surgery. Am J Roentgenol 2002
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Bipat S, Phoa SS, van Delden OM, et al. Ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis and determining resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a metaanalysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Bluemke DA, Cameron JL, Hruban RH, et al. Potentially resectable panc