Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4

Diagnostics in cystic echinococcosis: Serology versus ultrasonography

Pages
398–404
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Serological methods can serve an adjunctive role

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/Aims: Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is the most widespread zoonosis worldwide.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The objective of the present study was to compare diagnostic methods in the work-up of suspected cystic echinococcosis of the liver.Materials and Methods: Data from a total of 68 patients were compiled and analyzed.Results: A diagnosis of cystic echinococcosis was made in 36.8% of patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Serological methods can serve an adjunctive role
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background/Aims: Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is the most widespread zoonosis worldwide. The objective of the present study was to compare diagnostic methods in the work-up of suspected cystic echinococcosis of the liver.Materials and Methods: Data from a total of 68 patients were compiled and analyzed.Results: A diagnosis of cystic echinococcosis was made in 36.8% of patients. Broken down according to WHO criteria, patients with at least one echinococcus cyst were determined in 12.0% of cases to exhibit cysts consistent with stage 1 disease (CE1), while in 24.0%, cysts consistent with CE2 and CE3 were identified. CE4 and CE5 cysts were identified in 32.0% and 8.0% of patients, respectively. Solitary cysts were found in 60.0% of patients with cystic echinococcosis, while in patients with at least one cystic lesion, there were most often multiple cysts. The indirect hemagglutination test (IHA) and echinococcus-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) concentration showed a higher sensitivity (60.9%, 68.4%) than did the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for Echinococcus multilocularis (Em2+) and total IgE (11.1%, 38.9%). The respective specificities of all four serological methods lay between 83.9% and 88.9%.Conclusion: Our data show that ultrasound remains the diagnostic method of choice in the work-up of cystic lesions of the liver suspected to be due to Echinococcus granulosus. Serological methods can serve an adjunctive role

🔖

Cite This Article

WUESTENBERG, J., GRUENER, B., OEZTUERK, S., MASON, R. A., HAENLE, M. M., GRAETER, T., AKİNLİ, A. S., KERN, P., KRATZER, W. (2014). Diagnostics in cystic echinococcosis: Serology versus ultrasonography. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4, 398–404. https://ajindex.com/articles/409621

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. WHO. Cystic Echinococcosis and Multilocular Echinococcosis. Available from:
  2. Grosso G, Gruttadauria S, Biondi A, Marventano S, Mistretta A. Worldwide epidemiology of liver hydatidosis including the Mediterranean area. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18: 1425-37. [CrossRef] 3. Barnes TS, Deplazes P, Gottstein B, et al. Challenges for diagnosis and control of cystic hydatid disease. Acta Trop 2012; 123: 1-7. [CrossRef] 4. Mandal S, Mandal MD. Human cystic echinococcosis: Epidemiologic, zoonotic, clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects. Asian Pac J Trop Med 2012; 5: 253-60. [CrossRef] 5. Ernest E, Nonga HE, Kynsieri N, Cleaveland S. A retrospective survey of human hydatidosis based on hospital records during the period 1990-2003 in Ngorongoro, Tanzania. Zoonoses Public Health 2010; 5: 124-9. [CrossRef] 6. Derfoufi O, Ngoh Akwa E, Elmaataoui A, et al. Epidemiological profile of cystic echinococcosis in Morocco from 1980 to 2008. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 2012; 170: 457-61
  3. Vahedi MA, Vahedi ML. Demographics of patients with surgical and nonsurgical cystic echinococcosis in East Azerbaijan from 2001 to 2012. Pak J Biol Sci 2012; 15: 186-91. [CrossRef] 8. Eckert J, Deplazes P. Biological, epidemiological, and clinical aspects of echinococcosis, a zoonosis of increasing concern. Clin Microbiol Rev 2004; 17: 107-35. [CrossRef] 9. Mastrandrea S, Stegel G, Piseddu T, Ledda S, Masala G. A retrospective study on burden of human echinococcosis based on hospital discharge records from 2001 to 2009 in Sardinia, Italy. Acta Trop 2012; 123: 184-9. [CrossRef] 10. Stojkovic M, Rosenberger K, Kauczor HU, Junghanss T, Hosch W. Diagnosing and staging of cystic echinococcosis: How do CT and MRI perform in comparison to ultrasound? PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2012; 6: e1880
  4. Schweiger A, Grimm F, Tanner I, et al. Serological diagnosis of echinococcosis: the diagnostic potential of native antigens. Infection 2012; 40: 139-52. [CrossRef] 12. Nunnari G, Pinzone MR, Gruttadauria S, et al. Hepatic echinococcosis: Clinical and therapeutic aspects. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18: 1448-58. [CrossRef] 13. WHO Informal Working Group. International classification of ultrasound images in cystic echinococcosis for application in clinical and field epidemiological settings. Acta Trop 2003; 85: 253-61. [CrossRef] 14. Brunetti E, Gulizia R, Garlaschelli AL, et al. Cystic echinococcosis of the liver associated with repeated intern