Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2013 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2

Laparoskopik olarak rektal kanser ve eşlik eden karaciğer metastazlarının eş zamanlı tedavisiyle ilgili başlangıç tecrübeleri

The preliminary experience in simultaneous treatment of rectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases with laparoscopy

Pages
127–133
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is worth further inves- tigation regarding its advantages over traditional modalities with a prospective randomized controlled study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aims: There is no consensus for laparoscopy first in patients with rectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases, whose metastases are confined to the liver.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: Concomitant with laparoscopic colorectal resection, eight patients received liver resection simultaneously; 10 patients underwent a variety of down-sta- ging management including local ablation, right hepatic portal vein ligation, and implantation of chemotherapy pumps into the he- patic artery.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is worth further inves- tigation regarding its advantages over traditional modalities with a prospective randomized controlled study.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aims: There is no consensus for laparoscopy first in patients with rectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases, whose metastases are confined to the liver. This study aimed to evaluate its indications for one-stage surgery in laparoscopy. Materials and Methods: Eighteen patients with rectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases, who had undergone laparosco- pic colorectal resection and simultaneous treatment for liver metastases, were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Concomitant with laparoscopic colorectal resection, eight patients received liver resection simultaneously; 10 patients underwent a variety of down-sta- ging management including local ablation, right hepatic portal vein ligation, and implantation of chemotherapy pumps into the he- patic artery. The colo-anal/rectal anastomoses were performed with a stapler or “pull-though” mode though the anus. Three pati- ents underwent two-stage liver resection following tumor down-staging. Median survival time was 22.3 months. Conclusions: La- paroscopy approach for rectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases is feasible in selected patients. Colon pull-through anasto- mosis was a potential method to avoid abdominal incision and decrease the risk of anastomotic leakage. It is worth further inves- tigation regarding its advantages over traditional modalities with a prospective randomized controlled study.

Özet

Amaç: Laparoskopik tedavi rektal kanser ve senkron karaciğer metastazları için yeni bir alternatif olmuştur. Ancak, sadece karaciğer metastazı olan rektal kanser ve senkron karaciğer metastazları olan hastalar için ilk olarak laparoskopi yapılmasıyla ilgili bir konsensüs yoktur. Bu çalışmanın amacı, laparoskopik olarak tek basamaklı cerrahinin endikasyonlarını değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Rektal kanser ve senkron karaciğer metastazlı laparoskopik kolorektal rezeksiyonla eş zamanlı karaciğer me- tastaz tedavisi gören 18 hasta retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Laparoskopik kolorektal rezeksiyonla birlikte, 8 has- taya eş zamanlı karaciğer rezeksiyonu, 10 hastaya lokal ablasyon, sağ hepatik portal ven rezeksiyonu ve hepatik arter içerisine me- tastaza yönelik kemoterapi pompası implante edilmesi gibi her türlü “down-staging” yöntemi uygulandı. Kolo-anal/rektal anasto- moz stapler veya “pull through” yöntemiyle anüsten yapıldı. Üç hastaya “down staging” sonrası 2 aşamalı karaciğer rezeksiyonu yapıldı. Ortanca sağkalım süresi 22.3 aydı. Sonuç: Seçilmiş hastalarda rektal kanser ve senkron karaciğer metastazına yönelik la- paroskopik yöntem uygulanabilirdir. Kolon “pull through” yöntemi abdominal insizyon ve anastomoz kaçağının önlenmesi açısın- dan potansiyel bir yöntemdir. Prospektif randomize bir çalışmayla geleneksel yöntemlere üstünlüğü araştırılmaya değerdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZHU, Z., TAN, J., TAN, H., HU, B., CHEN, K., DING, X., LENG, J., CHEN, F. (2013). Laparoskopik olarak rektal kanser ve eşlik eden karaciğer metastazlarının eş zamanlı tedavisiyle ilgili başlangıç tecrübeleri. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2, 127–133. https://ajindex.com/articles/409601

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Garden OJ, Rees M, Poston GJ, et al. Guidelines for resection of colorectal and liver metastases. Gut 2006; 55(Suppl 3): 1-8
  2. Bolton JS, Fuhrman GM. Survival after resection of mul- tiple bilobar hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Ann Surg 2000; 231: 743-51
  3. Tanaka K, Shimada H, Togo S, et al. Outcome using hemi- hepatic vascular occlusion versus the pringle maneuver in resections limited to one hepatic section or less. J Gastro- intest Surg 2006; 10: 980-6
  4. Poon RT, Fan ST, Tsang FH, Wong J. Locoregional thera- pies for hepatocellular carcinoma: a critical review from the surgeon's perspective. Ann Surg 2002; 235: 466-86
  5. Feliciotti F, Paganini A, Guerrieri M, et al. Laparoscopic intra-arterial catheter implantation for regional chemothe- rapy of liver metastasis. Surg Endosc 1996; 10: 449-52
  6. Are C, Prete SIF, Crafa FM. Feasibility of laparoscopic por- tal vein ligation prior to major hepatectomy. HPB (Oxford) 2008; 10: 229-33
  7. Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Ueno M, et al. Standardized techni- que of laparoscopic intracorporeal rectal transection and anastomosis for low anterior resection. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 557-61
  8. Bernhoft WH, Portin BA. Low rectal anastomosis modified pull-through procedure. AMA Arch Surg 1965; 90: 123-6
  9. Cherqwi D. Laparoscopic liver resection. Br J Surg 2003; 90: 644-6
  10. Weber JC, Bachellier P, Oussoultzoglou E, Jaeck D. Simul- taneous resection of colorectal primary tumour and synchronous liver metastases. Br J Surg 2003; 90: 956-62
  11. Al-Hozaim O, Al-Maary J, AlQahtani A, Zamakhshary M. Laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through for anorectal malformations: a systematic review and the need for stan- dardization of outcome reporting. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45: 1500-4
  12. Facy O, Lagoutte N, Jambet S, et al. After low anterior rec- tal resection, colonic pull-through with delayed colo-anal anastomosis can avoid the need for a diverting ileostomy. J Chir (Paris) 2009; 146: 458-63. 13. de Santibanes E, Lassalle FB, McCormack L, et al. Simul- taneous colorectal and hepatic resections for colorectal can- cer: postoperative and long-term outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2002; 195: 196-202
  13. Martin R, Paty P, Fong Y, et al. Simultaneous liver and co- lorectal resections are safe for synchronous colorectal liver metastasis. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 197: 233-42
  14. Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Saiura A, et al. Simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metas- tases: initial experience of lapa