Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

Multiple orifices are better than single in the endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts

Pages
59–62
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Multi-channel endoscopic anastomosis of pancreatic cyst to the gastrointestinal tract is a very effective method for drainage of large post-inflammatory pancreatic cysts, comparable in terms of effectiveness with the surgical method but less invasive.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the surgical drainage of large, symptomatic pancreatic cysts (>5 cm) with single- and multi-channel endoscopic drainage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: In the period 2005-2010, we treated 112 patients with post-inflammatory pancreatic cysts.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Multi-channel endoscopic anastomosis of pancreatic cyst to the gastrointestinal tract is a very effective method for drainage of large post-inflammatory pancreatic cysts, comparable in terms of effectiveness with the surgical method but less invasive.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2005-2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background/Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the surgical drainage of large, symptomatic pancreatic cysts (>5 cm) with single- and multi-channel endoscopic drainage. Materials and Methods: In the period 2005-2010, we treated 112 patients with post-inflammatory pancreatic cysts. Thirty-six patients underwent surgical internal drainage. The remaining group of patients was treated endoscopically. In 28 of them, drainage was performed by anastomosing the cyst to the gastrointestinal tract using a single pig tail drain and then widening the channel to a diameter of 15 mm. Forty-eight patients underwent multi-channel cystic drainage. It consisted of connecting the cyst to the stomach and/or duodenum using at least 3 drains. Each connection was widened to a minimum diameter of 15 mm to ensure free drainage of the morphotic elements of the cyst. Each procedure was preceded by abdominal computed tomography to determine the exact location of the cyst in relation to the gastrointestinal tract and a Doppler ultrasound scan to determine the location of the blood vessels modeling on its surface. Results: In 48 patients with multi-channel drainage, there was no obstruction of the anastomosis, and cysts closed within 4 months. The drains were removed after about 3 months. The created channels were patent for about 3-4 weeks, which was enough to completely close the cyst. Conclusion: Multi-channel endoscopic anastomosis of pancreatic cyst to the gastrointestinal tract is a very effective method for drainage of large post-inflammatory pancreatic cysts, comparable in terms of effectiveness with the surgical method but less invasive.

🔖

Cite This Article

MİLEK, T., CİOSTEK, P., KİELAR, M., JAROSZ, M., SLOWİK, K., PETRYKA, R., BLALEJCZYK, T. (2014). Multiple orifices are better than single in the endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 59–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/409534

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Rogers BH, Cicurel NJ, Seed RW. Transgastric needle aspiration of pancreatic pseudocyst through an endoscope. Gastrointest En- dosc 1975; 21: 133-4. [CrossRef] Hershfield NB. Drainage of a pancreatic pseudocyst at ERCP. Gas- trointest Endosc 1984; 30: 269-70. [CrossRef] Kozarek RA, Brayko CM, Harlan J, et al. Endoscopic drainage of pancre- atic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 1985; 31: 322-8. [CrossRef] Adkisson KW, Baron TH, Morgan DE. Pancreatic fluid collections: diagnosis and endoscopic management, Semin Gastrointest Dis 1998; 9: 61-72.
  2. Hariri M, Slivka A, Carr-Locke DL, Banks PA. Pseudocyst drainage predisposes to infection when pancreatic necrosis is unrecog- nized. AM J Gastroenterol 1781; 89: 1781-4. Kozarek RA. Endotherapy for organized pancreatic necrosis: perspec- tives on skunk-poking. Gastroenterology 1996; 111: 820-2. [CrossRef] Libera ED, Siqueira ES, Morais M, et al. Pancreatic pseudocysts: transpap- illary and transmural drainage. HPB Surg 2000; 11: 333-8. [CrossRef] Monkemuller KE, Baron TH, Morgan DE. Transmural drainage of pan- creatic fluid collections without electrocautery using the seldinger technique. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48: 195-200. [CrossRef] Binmoeller KF, Seifert H, Walter A, et al. Transpapillary and trans- mural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42: 219-24. [CrossRef] Norton ID, Clain JE, Wiersema MJ, DiMagno EP, Petersen BT, Gostout CJ. Utility of endoscopic ultrasonography in endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts in selected patients. Mayo Clin Proc 2001; 76: 794-8. [CrossRef] Etzkorn KP, DeGuzman LJ, Holderman WH, et al. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: patient selection and evalu- 61 ation of the outcome by endoscopic ultrasonography. Endosco- py 1995; 27: 329-33. [CrossRef] Baron TH, Harewood GC, Morgan DE, Yates MR. Outcome differ- ences after endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrosis, acute pancreatic pseudocysts, and chronic pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 7-17. [CrossRef] Barton TH, Morgan DE. Endoscopic transgastric irrigation tube placement via PEG for debridement of organized pancreatic ne- crosis. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 574-7. [CrossRef]