Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2015 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of one and two-day bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol in pediatric colonoscopy

Pages
232–235
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Keywords: Colon, preparation, PEG, bisacodyl, children

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/Aims: Proper colon preparation in children has been a challenge for many years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 100 children (2-14 years old) who were candidates for colonoscopy were enrolled and divided into two groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Keywords: Colon, preparation, PEG, bisacodyl, children
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background/Aims: Proper colon preparation in children has been a challenge for many years. Different regimens have been used for this purpose, but the best regimen is not determined. The aim of this study was to evaluate successful colon preparation before colonoscopy in children who were treated with one- or two-day regimen with polyethylene glycol (PEG) plus bisacodyl and clear liquids. Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 100 children (2-14 years old) who were candidates for colonoscopy were enrolled and divided into two groups. The children in group one were started on 2 g/kg PEG powder (17 g in 240 mL water or another beverage) and 5 mg bisacodyl suppository (BD) the day before colo- noscopy, whereas those in the other group were started on 1.5 g/kg PEG with fruit juices for two days and 5 mg bisacodyl suppository (BD) for two days before colonoscopy. Results: Compliance rates, regimens, adverse effects, and complete colonoscopy were not significantly different be- tween the two groups. The Boston score was excellent and good in 70% of group one and 72% of group two children, respectively. Compliance rate, adverse effects, and need for enema were similar in both groups. The rate of compli- ance and non-requirement of enema were significantly higher in children with satisfactory colon preparation. Conclusion: The one-day PEG plus bisacodyl regimen for bowel preparation is as effective as the two-day regimen in children; furthermore, it is well tolerated and has low adverse effects. Keywords: Colon, preparation, PEG, bisacodyl, children

🔖

Cite This Article

NAJAFİ, M., FALLAHİ, G. H., MOTAMED, F., FARAHMAND, F., KHODADAD, A., GHAJARZADEH, M., REZAEI, N., MAHRABANİ, S. (2015). Comparison of one and two-day bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol in pediatric colonoscopy. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3, 232–235. https://ajindex.com/articles/409391

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adamiak T, Altaf M, Jensen MK, et al. One-day bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol 3350: an effective regimen for colonoscopy in children. Gastrointest Endosc 2010
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Israel DM, McLain BI, Hassall E. Successful pancolonoscopy and ileoscopy in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1994
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Steffen RM, Wyllie R, Sivak Jr MV, Michener WM, Caulfield ME. Colonoscopy in the pediatric patient. Journal Pediatr 1989
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Pashankar DS, Bishop WP. Efficacy and optimal dose of daily polyethylene glycol 3350 for treatment of constipation and encopresis in children. J Pediatr 2001
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Loening-Baucke V. Polyethylene glycol without electrolytes for children with constipation and encopresis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2002
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Gremse DA, Hixon J, Crutchfield A. Comparison of polyethylene glycol 3350 and lactulose for treatment of chronic constipation in children. Clin Pediatr 2002
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Phatak UP, Johnson S, Husain SZ, Pashankar DS. Two-day bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol 3350 and bisacodyl: a new, safe, and effective regimen for colonoscopy in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2011
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 2009
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Sondheimer JM, Sokol RJ, Taylor SF, Silverman A, Zelasney B. Safety, efficacy, and tolerance of intestinal lavage in pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy. J Pediatr 1991
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Dahshan A, Lin C-H, Peters J, Thomas R, Tolia V. A randomized, prospective study to evaluate the efficacy and acceptance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy in children. Am J Gastroenterol 1999
  11. [CrossRef] 11. da Silva MM, Briars GL, Patrick MK, Cleghorn GJ, Shepherd RW. Colonoscopy preparation in children: safety, efficacy, and tolerance of high-versus low-volume cleansing methods. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1997
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Shaoul R, Wolff R, Seligmann H, Tal Y, Jaffe M. Symptoms of hyperphosphatemia, hypocalcemia, and hypomagnesemia in an adolescent after the oral administration of sodium phosphate in preparation for a colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2001
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Ullah N, Yeh R, Ehrinpreis M. Fatal hyperphosphatemia from a phosphosoda bo