High-resolution manometry versus conventional manometry in diagnosis of patients with nonobstructive dysphagia

References (1)

1. Gyawali CP, Bredenoord AJ, Conklin JL, et al. Evaluation of esopha- geal motor function in clinical practice. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013; 25: 99-133. [CrossRef] Soudagar AS, Sayuk GS, Gyawali CP. Learners favour high resolution oesophageal manometry with better diagnostic accuracy over conventional line tracings. Gut 2012; 61: 798-803. [CrossRef] Roman S, Huot L, Zerbib F, et al. High-Resolution Manometry Im- proves the Diagnosis of Esophageal Motility Disorders in Patients With Dysphagia: A Randomized Multicenter Study. Am J Gastro- enterol 2016; 111: 372-80. [CrossRef] Wallace KL, Middleton S, Cook IJ. Development and validation of a self-report symptom inventory to assess the severity of oral-pharyngeal dysphagia. Gastroenterology 2000; 118: 678-87. [CrossRef] Spechler SJ, Castell DO. Classification of oesophageal motility ab- normalities. Gut 2001; 49: 145-51. [CrossRef] Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ, et al. Chicago classifi cation cri- teria of esophageal motility disorders defi ned in high resolution esophageal esophageal pressure topography (EPT). Neurogas- troenterol Motil 2012; 24: 57-65. [CrossRef]