Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2016 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 5

Comparison of the effects of esomeprazole 40 mg, rabeprazole 20 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg, and pantoprazole 40 mg on intragastrıc pH in extensive metabolizer patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

Pages
408–414
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When the time needed to raise the intragatric pH to over 4 was evaluated, esomeprazole was found to have the most rapid action, followed by lansoprazole and rabeprazole

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/Aims: Studies on the therapeutic efficacy of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have been recently published.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We aimed to compare the acid inhibitory effects of esomeprazole 40 mg, rabeprazole 20 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg, and pantoprazole 40 mg on days 1 and 5 of treatment in patients with GERD, who were extensive metabolizers in regard to the CYP2C19 genotype.Materials and Methods: Helicobacter pylori-negative with typical symptoms of GERD patients were randomly divided into four treatment groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When the time needed to raise the intragatric pH to over 4 was evaluated, esomeprazole was found to have the most rapid action, followed by lansoprazole and rabeprazole
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background/Aims: Studies on the therapeutic efficacy of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have been recently published. In most of these studies, comparison of only two PPIs have been made. There are few studies on the comparison of four or more PPIs. We aimed to compare the acid inhibitory effects of esomeprazole 40 mg, rabeprazole 20 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg, and pantoprazole 40 mg on days 1 and 5 of treatment in patients with GERD, who were extensive metabolizers in regard to the CYP2C19 genotype.Materials and Methods: Helicobacter pylori-negative with typical symptoms of GERD patients were randomly divided into four treatment groups. Efficacy analysis on days 1 and 5 were performed on the four groups which comprised 10 (esomeprazole), 11 (rabeprazole), 10 (lansoprazole), and 10 (pantoprazole) patients. Results: On day 1 of PPI treatment, the mean percentage of time with intragastric pH>4 were 54%, 58%, 60%, and 35% for the groups, respectively, and on day 5, these values were 67%, 60%, 68%, and 59%, respectively. Esomeprazole, rabeprazole, and lansoprazole were found to be superior to pantoprazole on the first day of treatment.Conclusion: Pantoprazole is a less potent proton pump inhibitor than the other PPIs tested on the first day of treatment. When the time needed to raise the intragatric pH to over 4 was evaluated, esomeprazole was found to have the most rapid action, followed by lansoprazole and rabeprazole

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELEBİ, A., AYDIN, D., KOCAMAN, O., KONDUK, B. T., ŞENTÜRK, Ö., HÜLAGÜ, S. (2016). Comparison of the effects of esomeprazole 40 mg, rabeprazole 20 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg, and pantoprazole 40 mg on intragastrıc pH in extensive metabolizer patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 5, 408–414. https://ajindex.com/articles/409316

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Joelsson B, Johnsson F. Heartburn--the acid test. Gut 1989
  2. [CrossRef ] 2. Locke GR 3rd, Talley NJ, Fett SL, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ 3rd. Prevalence and Clinical Spectrum of Gastroesophageal Reflux: A Population-Based Study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology 1997
  3. [CrossRef ] 3. Bor S, Mandiracioglu A, Kitapcioglu G, Caymaz-Bor C, Gilbert RJ. Gastroesophageal reflux in a low-income region in Turkey. Am J Gastroenterol 2005
  4. [CrossRef ] 4. Dent J, Brun J, Fendrick AM, et al. An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management—the Genval workshop report. Gut 1999
  5. 44(Suppl 2): S1-16. 5. Katz PO, Gerson LB, Vela MF. Guidelines for the diagnosis and the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2013
  6. [CrossRef ] 6. Shi S, Klotz U. Proton pump inhibitors: an update of their clinical use and pharmacokinetics. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2008
  7. [CrossRef ] 7. Bell NJ, Hunt RH. Role of gastric acid suppression in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Gut 1992
  8. [CrossRef ] 8. Dickson EJ, Stuart RC. Genetics of response to proton pump inhibitor therapy. Am J Pharmacogenomics 2003
  9. [CrossRef ] 9. Desta Z, Zhao X, Shin JG, Flockhart DA. Clinical significance of the cytochrome P450 2C19 genetic polymorphism. Clin Pharmacokinet 2002
  10. [CrossRef ] 10. Celebi A, Kocaman O, Savlı H, Konduk BT, Senturk O, Hulagu S. The prevalence of CYP2C19 mutations in Turkish patients with dyspepsia. Turk J Gastroenterol 2009
  11. [CrossRef ] 11. Tolman KG, Täubel J, Warrington S, Chiu YL, Pimler BL, Pan WJ. Comparison of the effects of single and repeated oral doses of lansoprazole and rabeprazole on ambulatory 24-hour intragas- 413 tric pH in healthy volunteers. Clin Drug Investig 2006
  12. [CrossRef ] 12. Röhss K, Wilder-Smith C, Kilhamn J, Fjellman, Lind T. Suppression of gastric acid with intravenous esomeprazole and omeprazole: results of 3 studies in healthy subjects. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2007
  13. [CrossRef ] 13. Hartmann D, Eickhoff A, Damian U, Riemann JF, Schilling D. Effect of intravenous application of esomeprazole 40 mg versus pantoprazole 40 mg on 24-hour intragastric pH in healthy adults. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007
  14. [CrossRef ] 14. Miehlke S, Madisch A, Kirsch C, et al. Intragastric acidity during treatment with esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily or pantoprazole 40 mg twice daily–a rando