AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightTherefore, LC can be performed safely in the early period afterERCP.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Özet
Background/Aims: Several studies recommend prompt laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for choledocholithiasis. However, histopathological alterations in the gallbladder during this time intervaland the role played by ERCP in causing these changes have not been sufficiently elucidated. To compare early period LCs with delayedLCs following common bile duct stone extraction via ERCP with regard to operation time, hospitalization period, conversion to opencholecystectomy rate, morbidity, mortality, and histopathological alterations in the gallbladder wall.Materials and Methods: A total of 85 patients were retrospectively divided into three groups: early period LC group (48-72 h; n=30),moderate period LC group (72 h-6 weeks; n=25), and delayed period LC group (6-8 weeks; n=30).Results: The operation time was significantly shorter, and the total number of complication rates and hospital readmission wassignificantly less frequent in the early period LC group (p 3mm) in the moderate and late period LC groups than in the early period LC group (p<0.001). Culture growth was significantlyhigher, and fibrosis/collagen deposition in the gallbladder wall with injury to the mucosal epithelium was significantly morefrequently detected by histopathological examination in the moderate and late period LC groups than in the early period LCgroup (p<0.05).Conclusion: Early period LC following stone extraction by ERCP is associated with shorter operation time, fewer fibrotic changes inthe gallbladder, and lower risk for the development of complications. Therefore, LC can be performed safely in the early period afterERCP.