Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2019 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 6

Assessing the characteristics and feasibility of preventing early mortality in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Pages
541–548
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The presence of aggressive treatments significantly improved the 12-month survival rate of advanced HCCpatients with BCLC stage C/D (presence vs. absence: 78.3% vs. 7.4%), a maximum nodule size of >3 cm (76.7% vs. 7.7%), and a JIS scoreof ≥4 (60.0% vs. 0%).Conclusion: Although delayed detection of HCC strongly increased the onset ED, the aggressiveness of HCC treatment is not readilydowngraded, and the most aggressive treatment possible should be considered to prevent ED in patients with advanced HCC.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/Aims: To determine strategies to prevent early death (ED) and improve the prognosis of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Materials and Methods: Patients who were diagnosed with HCC from January 2012 to June 2017 were considered for the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thosewho survived for ≤6 months from the date of diagnosis were classified into the ED group (n=21) and those who survived for ≥12 monthsfrom the date of diagnosis were classified into the non-ED group (n=88).Results: There were significant differences between the ED and non-ED groups in the following conditions: when the patient age was≥80 years (38.1% vs. 14.8% patients); maximum nodule size was >3 cm (90.5% vs. 27.3%); Child-Pugh class C liver disease was seen(66.7% vs. 26.1%); tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) Stage III-IV tumor was present (85.7% vs. 21.6%); BCLC stage C/D of liver cancer wasseen (81.0% vs. 21.6%); JIS score was ≥4 (52.4% vs. 3.4%); serum creatinine level was ≥1.0 mg/dL (52.4% vs. 22.7%); and there was absence of aggressive treatments such as hepatic resection, radiofrequency ablation, transarterial chemoembolization, and chemotherapy (66.7% vs. 4.5%).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The presence of aggressive treatments significantly improved the 12-month survival rate of advanced HCCpatients with BCLC stage C/D (presence vs. absence: 78.3% vs. 7.4%), a maximum nodule size of >3 cm (76.7% vs. 7.7%), and a JIS scoreof ≥4 (60.0% vs. 0%).Conclusion: Although delayed detection of HCC strongly increased the onset ED, the aggressiveness of HCC treatment is not readilydowngraded, and the most aggressive treatment possible should be considered to prevent ED in patients with advanced HCC.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background/Aims: To determine strategies to prevent early death (ED) and improve the prognosis of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Materials and Methods: Patients who were diagnosed with HCC from January 2012 to June 2017 were considered for the study. Thosewho survived for ≤6 months from the date of diagnosis were classified into the ED group (n=21) and those who survived for ≥12 monthsfrom the date of diagnosis were classified into the non-ED group (n=88).Results: There were significant differences between the ED and non-ED groups in the following conditions: when the patient age was≥80 years (38.1% vs. 14.8% patients); maximum nodule size was >3 cm (90.5% vs. 27.3%); Child-Pugh class C liver disease was seen(66.7% vs. 26.1%); tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) Stage III-IV tumor was present (85.7% vs. 21.6%); BCLC stage C/D of liver cancer wasseen (81.0% vs. 21.6%); JIS score was ≥4 (52.4% vs. 3.4%); serum creatinine level was ≥1.0 mg/dL (52.4% vs. 22.7%); and there was absence of aggressive treatments such as hepatic resection, radiofrequency ablation, transarterial chemoembolization, and chemotherapy (66.7% vs. 4.5%). Logistic regression analysis identified maximum nodule size of >3 cm (p=0.005, OR=58.7, 95% CI=3.43-1003.9),JIS score of ≥4 (p=0.021, OR=12.0, 95% CI=1.44-100.1), and absence of aggressive treatments (p=0.006, OR=24.7, 95% CI=2.47-247.2)as predictive factors for ED. The presence of aggressive treatments significantly improved the 12-month survival rate of advanced HCCpatients with BCLC stage C/D (presence vs. absence: 78.3% vs. 7.4%), a maximum nodule size of >3 cm (76.7% vs. 7.7%), and a JIS scoreof ≥4 (60.0% vs. 0%).Conclusion: Although delayed detection of HCC strongly increased the onset ED, the aggressiveness of HCC treatment is not readilydowngraded, and the most aggressive treatment possible should be considered to prevent ED in patients with advanced HCC.

🔖

Cite This Article

WATANABE, M., YOKOMORI, H., TAKAHASHI, Y., OKADA, T., SHIBUYA, A., KOIZUMI, W. (2019). Assessing the characteristics and feasibility of preventing early mortality in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 6, 541–548. https://ajindex.com/articles/409281

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Bosetti C, Turati F, La Vecchia C. Hepatocellular carcinoma epidemiology. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2014
  2. [CrossRef] 2. El-Serag HB. Epidemiology of viral hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2012
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Kokudo N, Hasegawa K, Akahane M, et al. Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Japan Society of Hepatology 2013 update (3rd JSH-HCC Guidelines). Hepatol Res 2015
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: An Update. Hepatology. 2011
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Ahn J, Lim JK, Lee HM, et al. Lower observed hepatocellular carcinoma incidence in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with entecavir: results of the ENUMERATE study. Am J Gastroenterol 2016
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Hsu CS, Huang CJ, Kao JH, et al. Interferon-based therapy decreases risks of hepatocellular carcinoma and complications of cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis C patients. PLoS One. 2013
  7. e70458. [CrossRef] 7. Kudo M. Surveillance, Diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of liver cancer in Japan. Liver Cancer 2015
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Ukawa S, Okada E, Nakamura K, et al. Characteristics of patients with liver cancer in the BioBank Japan project. J Epidemiol 2017
  9. S43-S48. [CrossRef] 9. Kudo M, Chung H, Haji S, et al. Validation of a new prognostic staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma: the JIS score compared with the CLIP score. Hepatology 2004
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Minagawa M, Ikai I, Matsuyama Y, Yamaoka Y, Makuuchi M. Staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: assessment of the Japanese TNM and AJCC/UICC TNM systems in a cohort of 13,772 patients in Japan. Ann Surg 2007
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Llovet JM, Ducreux M, Lencioni R, et al. EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2012
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Vellinga A, Cormican M, Hanahoe B, Bennett K, Murphy AW. Optout as an acceptable method of obtaining consent in medical research: a short report. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Alessandria C, Ozdogan O, Guevara M, et al. MELD score and clinical type predict prognosis in hepatorenal syndrome: relevance to liver transplantation. Hepatology 2005
  14. [CrossRef] 14. Zhang DX, Dai YD, Yuan SX, Tao L. Prognostic factors in patients with pancreatic cancer. Exp Ther Med 2012
  15. [CrossRef] 15. Alexander S, Lemmens VE, Houterman S, Nollen L, Ro