Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2021 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 6

Blastocystis and Clostridioides difficile: Evidence for a Synergistic Role in Colonization Among IBD Patients with Emphasis on Ulcerative Colitis

Pages
500–507
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, it can be proposed that these microorganisms may have synergistic effects on their colonization in the gastrointestinal tract.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Regarding the controversial role of Blastocystis in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) patients, it seems that this protozoan may lead to an overgrowth of some non-beneficial bacteria.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Stool samples of 102 IBD patients were collected and cultivated for C. difficile and Blastocystis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, it can be proposed that these microorganisms may have synergistic effects on their colonization in the gastrointestinal tract.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background: Regarding the controversial role of Blastocystis in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) patients, it seems that this protozoan may lead to an overgrowth of some non-beneficial bacteria. The current study aimed to investigate the co-existence of Blastocystis and Clostridioides difficile in IBD patients. Methods: Stool samples of 102 IBD patients were collected and cultivated for C. difficile and Blastocystis. DNA extraction was performed on positive samples and C. difficile and Blastocystis were toxinotyped and subtyped, respectively. Fisher’s exact test and logistic regression were employed to calculate the correlation between the existence of Blastocystis and its subtypes (ST) with C. difficile and its type of toxins. Also, the co-existence of Blastocystis and C. difficile with the frequency of defecations was evaluated. Results: Blastocystis and C. difficile were observed in 17 (16.7%) and 26 (25.5%) of stool samples, respectively. From 26 C. difficilepositive isolates, 24 (92.3%) and 2 (7.7%) were tcdA+/B+ and tcdA+/B-, respectively. Also, 10 (58.8%) and 7 (41.2%) were Blastocystis ST1 and ST3, respectively. Statistically significant correlations between co-existence of Blastocystis and C. difficile and co-existence of these microorganisms and frequency of defecation (P < .035) were seen. There was no statistically significant correlation between subtypes of Blastocystis and colonization of C. difficile or its toxinotypes. Conclusion: The co-existence of Blastocystis and C. difficile in IBD patients was observed in the current study. Moreover, it can be proposed that these microorganisms may have synergistic effects on their colonization in the gastrointestinal tract.

🔖

Cite This Article

AZİMİRAD, M., GOL, S. M. A., JAVANMARD, E., MİRJALALİ, H., YADEGAR, A., AGHDAEİ, H. A., SHAHROKH, S., SADEGHİ, A., ZALİ, M. R. (2021). Blastocystis and Clostridioides difficile: Evidence for a Synergistic Role in Colonization Among IBD Patients with Emphasis on Ulcerative Colitis. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 6, 500–507. https://ajindex.com/articles/409222

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Hanauer SB. Inflammatory bowel disease: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and therapeutic opportunities. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006
  2. 12(suppl 1):S3-S9. [CrossRef] 2. Ko JK, Auyeung KK. Inflammatory bowel disease: Etiology, pathogenesis and current therapy. Curr Pharm Des. 2014
  3. 20(7):1082- 1096. [CrossRef] 3. Kucharzik T, Maaser C, Lügering A, et al. Recent understanding of IBD pathogenesis: Implications for future therapies. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006
  4. 12(11):1068-1083. [CrossRef] 4. Kaplan GG. The global burden of IBD: from 2015 to 2025. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015
  5. 12(12):720-727. [CrossRef] 5. Danese S, Sans M, Fiocchi C. Inflammatory bowel disease: The role of environmental factors. Autoimmun Rev. 2004
  6. 3(5):394-400. [CrossRef] 6. Shouval DS, Rufo PA. The role of environmental factors in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases: A review. JAMA Pediatr. 2017
  7. 171(10):999-1005. [CrossRef] 7. D’Aoust J, Battat R, Bessissow T. Management of inflammatory bowel disease with Clostridium difficile infection. World J Gastroenterol. 2017
  8. 23(27):4986-5003. [CrossRef] 8. Dogruman-Al F, Kustimur S, Yoshikawa H, et al. Blastocystis subtypes in irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease in Ankara, Turkey. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009
  9. 104(5):724-727. [CrossRef] 9. Khanna S, Pardi DS. IBD: poor outcomes after Clostridium difficile infection in IBD. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012
  10. 9(6):307-308. [CrossRef] 10. Machiels K, Joossens M, Sabino J, et al. A decrease of the butyrate-producing species Roseburia hominis and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii defines dysbiosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Gut. 2014
  11. 63(8):1275-1283. [CrossRef] 11. Tan KS, Mirza H, Teo JD, Wu B, MacAry PA. Current views on the clinical relevance of Blastocystis spp. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2010
  12. 12(1):28-35. [CrossRef] 12. Stensvold CR, Clark CG. Current status of Blastocystis: A personal view. Parasitol Int. 2016
  13. 65(6 Pt B):763-771. [CrossRef] 13. Angelici MC, Nardis C, Scarpelli R, Ade P. Blastocystis hominis transmission by non-potable water: a case report in Italy. New Microbiol. 2018
  14. 41(2):173-177. PMID: 29498738. 14. Anuar TS, Ghani MK, Azreen SN, Salleh FM, Moktar N. Blastocystis infection in Malaysia: Evidence of waterborne and human-tohuman transmissions among the Proto-Malay, negrito and Senoi tribes of Orang Asli. Parasit Vectors. 2013
  15. [CrossRef] 15. Javanmard E, Rahimi HM, Niyyati M, et al. Molecular analysis of Blastocystis sp. and its subtypes from treated wastewa