Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2022 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3

Electrogastrography in Patients with Functional Dyspepsia, Joint Hypermobility, and Diabetic Gastroparesis

Pages
182–189
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The electrogastrography results showed that preprandial dominant frequency (P = .031*), dominant power (P = .047*), and instability coefficient (P = .043*), and postprandial dominant frequency (P = .041*) and dominant power (P = .035*) results were statistically significant among the functional dyspepsia, joint hypermobility, diabetic gastroparesis, and control groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Transcutaneous electrogastrography is a novel modality to assess the human stomach’s gastric myoelectrical activity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This study analyzed 120 subjects with functional dyspepsia (n = 30), joint hypermobility (n = 30), diabetic gastroparesis (n = 30), and control subjects (n = 30).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The electrogastrography results showed that preprandial dominant frequency (P = .031*), dominant power (P = .047*), and instability coefficient (P = .043*), and postprandial dominant frequency (P = .041*) and dominant power (P = .035*) results were statistically significant among the functional dyspepsia, joint hypermobility, diabetic gastroparesis, and control groups.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background: Transcutaneous electrogastrography is a novel modality to assess the human stomach’s gastric myoelectrical activity. The purpose of this study was to compare functional dyspepsia, joint hypermobility, and diabetic gastroparesis patients with healthy control subjects in terms of gastric motility abnormalities through electrogastrography evaluations, and to then evaluate the correlation among variations in their blood parameters. Methods: This study analyzed 120 subjects with functional dyspepsia (n = 30), joint hypermobility (n = 30), diabetic gastroparesis (n = 30), and control subjects (n = 30). The electrogastrography parameters included the dominant frequency, dominant power, power ratio, and instability coefficient, which were analyzed preprandially and postprandially. Although there are similar studies in the literature, there is no other study in which all groups have been studied together, as in our study. Results: The electrogastrography results showed that preprandial dominant frequency (P = .031*), dominant power (P = .047*), and instability coefficient (P = .043*), and postprandial dominant frequency (P = .041*) and dominant power (P = .035*) results were statistically significant among the functional dyspepsia, joint hypermobility, diabetic gastroparesis, and control groups. There was no significant difference found in terms of power ratio (P = .114) values. However, only glucose (P = .04*) and calcium (P = .04*) levels showed statistical significance. Several blood tests including hemoglobin (P = .032*), creatinine (P= .045*), calcium (P = .037*), potassium (P= .041*), white blood cells (P = .038*), and alanine aminotransferase (P = .031*) also showed correlation with the dominant frequency, power ratio, and instability coefficient parameters. Conclusions: This joint methodology demonstrated that it is possible to differentiate between functional dyspepsia, joint hypermobility, and diabetic gastroparesis patients from healthy subjects by using electrogastrography. Moreover, the majority of patients showed adequate gastric motility in response to food.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAFEE, A. A., CİLACI, T., KAYAR, Y., AKAN, A. (2022). Electrogastrography in Patients with Functional Dyspepsia, Joint Hypermobility, and Diabetic Gastroparesis. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3, 182–189. https://ajindex.com/articles/409174

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Yin J, Chen JDZ. Electrogastrography: methodology, validation and applications. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013
  2. 19(1):5-17. [CrossRef] 2. Parkman HP, Hasler WL, Barnett JL, Eaker EY, American Motility Society Clinical GI Motility Testing Task Force. Electrogastrography: a document prepared by the gastric section of the American Motility Society Clinical GI Motility Testing Task Force. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2003
  3. 15(2):89-102. [CrossRef] 3. Jung KT, Park H, Kim J-H, et al. The relationship between gastric myoelectric activity and mutation suggesting sodium channelopathy in patients with Brugada syndrome and functional dyspepsia: a pilot study. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012
  4. 18(1):58-63. [CrossRef] 4. Phillips LK, Deane AM, Jones KL, Rayner CK, Horowitz M. Gastric emptying and glycaemia in health and diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015
  5. 11(2):112 -128. [CrossRef] 5. Qin S, Ding W, Miao L, et al. Signal reconstruction of the slow wave and spike potential from electrogastrogram. Bio Med Mater Eng. 2015
  6. 26(S1):S1515-S1521. [CrossRef] 6. Poscente MD, Mintchev MP. Enhanced electrogastrography: a realistic way to salvage a promise that was never kept? World J Gastroenterol. 2017
  7. 23(25):4517-4528. [CrossRef] 7. Riezzo G, Russo F, Indrio F. Electrogastrography in adults and children: the strength, pitfalls, and clinical significance of the cutaneous recording of the gastric electrical activity. BioMed Res Int. 2013
  8. 282757. [CrossRef] 8. Fikree A, Grahame R, Aktar R, et al. A prospective evaluation of undiagnosed joint hypermobility syndrome in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014
  9. 12(10):1680- 87.e2. [CrossRef] 9. Kayar Y, Danalıoğlu A, Kafee AA, Okkesim Ş, Şentürk H. Gastric myoelectrical activity abnormalities of electrogastrography in patients with functional dyspepsia. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2016
  10. 27(5):415-420. [CrossRef] 10. Kim HY, Park SJ, Kim YH. Clinical application of electrogastrography in patients with stomach cancer who undergo distal gastrectomy. J Gastric Cancer. 2014
  11. 14(1):47-53. [CrossRef] 11. Kaji M, Nomura M, Tamura Y, Ito S. Relationships between insulin resistance, blood glucose levels and gastric motility: an electrogastrography and external ultrasonography study. J Med Invest. 2007
  12. 54(1-2):168-176. [CrossRef] 12. Soykan I, Lin Z, Sarosiek I, McCallum RW. Gastric myoelectrical activity, gastric emptying, and correlations with symptoms and fasting blood glucose levels in diabetic patients.