Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2

EVALUATION OF PATIENTS FOLLOWED IN A PALLIATIVE CARE UNIT IN TURKEY

Pages
227–234
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We believe that this study can help contribute to the awareness of palliative care and service scope, which is still developing in Turkey and around the world.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: The need for palliative care services is increasing day by day, but we think that these services are not sufficiently recognized by the society and health professionals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Method: In this descriptive and retrospective study, 316 patients hospitalized in Palliative Care Unit of Harran University Research and Practice Hospital between April 2017- February 2019 were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We believe that this study can help contribute to the awareness of palliative care and service scope, which is still developing in Turkey and around the world.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: The need for palliative care services is increasing day by day, but we think that these services are not sufficiently recognized by the society and health professionals. In this study, by presenting sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the patients hospitalized in the palliative care unit together, we seek to raise awareness of palliative care services, which are still developing in Turkey. Materials and Method: In this descriptive and retrospective study, 316 patients hospitalized in Palliative Care Unit of Harran University Research and Practice Hospital between April 2017- February 2019 were included. Sociodemographic characteristics and clinical data of the patients were evaluated. Falling risk is evaluated according to the Itaki Fall Risk Scale, Pressure Ulcers according to the guidelines published jointly by the National and European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panels. The data were analyzed using frequency and percentage tests. Results: Of 316 patients, 54.43%(n=172) were female, 45.57%(n=144) male; mean age was 66.23±19.66 years (18-111). The most common reason for hospitalization was cerebrovascular disease with a rate of 22.15%(n=70), then respectively malignancy was at 20.89%(n=66), cardiovascular disease at 15.19%(n=48), asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and Alzheimer’s disease at 5.70%(n=18). Comorbidity was found at 88.61%(n=280) and majority of the patients (67.72%) were fed orally. The rate of patients with tracheostomy was 3.80%(n=12) and pressure ulcer at 23.70%(n=75). Conclusion: Symptoms, pressure ulcers and nutritional support treatments in patients hospitalized in palliative care unit were presented with sociodemographic data. We believe that this study can help contribute to the awareness of palliative care and service scope, which is still developing in Turkey and around the world.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇADIRCI, D., AYAZÖZ, Y., KOÇAKOĞLU, Ş. (2021). EVALUATION OF PATIENTS FOLLOWED IN A PALLIATIVE CARE UNIT IN TURKEY. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2, 227–234. https://ajindex.com/articles/409062

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Sepúlveda C, Marlin A, Yoshida T, Ullrich A. Palliative care: the World Health Organization’s global per- spective. J Pain Symptom Manage 2002;24(2):91-6. (PMID: 12231124)
  2. World Health Organization WHO. Palliative Care 2020 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.who.int/ news-room/fact-sheets/detail/palliative-care. Ac- cessed: 09.01.2020
  3. Saunders C. The Depths and the Possible Heights. Med News 1964;10:16-17. (DOI:10.1093/acprof:o- so/9780198570530.003.0012)
  4. Tekin N. An Example of Support Program to Elderly Patient and Elderly Relative During the Terminal Pe- riod in a Developed Model of Residential Home and Geriatric Care Center. Turkish Journal of Geriatrics 2011;14(3):273-5. (in Turkish)
  5. Kabalak AA. Palliative Care Patient, Palliative Care Admission and Discharge Criteria. In: Kabalak AA (Eds). Palliative Care Guide. Dünya Tıp Kitabevi, An- kara, 2018, pp. 17-9
  6. Kivanç MM. Palliative Care Services in Turkey. HSP. 2017;4 (2):132-5. (in Turkish) (DOI: 10.17681/hsp-der- gisi.316894)
  7. Dalgaard KM, Bergenholtz H, Nielsen ME, Timm H. Early integration of palliative care in hospitals: A sys- tematic review on methods, barriers, and outcome. Palliat Support Care. 2014 Dec;12(6):495-513. doi: 10.1017/S1478951513001338. Epub 2014 Mar 13. PMID: 24621947
  8. Al-Mahrezi A, Al-Mandhari Z. Palliative Care: Time for Action. Oman Med J. 2016 May;31(3):161-3. doi: 10.5001/omj.2016.32. PMID: 27162584; PMCID: PMC4852088
  9. Özlü ZK, Yayla A, Özer N, Gümüş K, Erdağı S, Kaya Z. Risks of Falling in Surgical Patients. Kafkas J Med. 2014;5(3):94-9. (in Turkish) (DOI:10.5505/ kjms.2015.19870)
  10. European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and Na- tional Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: quick reference guide. Washington DC: National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel; 2009
  11. Egici MT, Can MK, Toprak D et al. Care Burden and Burnout Status of Caregivers Whose Patients are Treated in Palliative Care Centers. JAREN. 2019;5(1):1- 8. (in Turkish) (DOI:10.5222/jaren.2019.38247)
  12. Dincer M, Kahveci K, Döğer C, Gökçinar D, Yari- ci Ak, Taş H. Factors Affecting the Duration of Ad- mission and Discharge in a Palliative Care Center for Geriatric Patients. Turkish Journal of Geriatrics. 2016;19(2):74-80
  13. Yürüyen M, Tevetoğlu IÖ, Tekmen Y, Polat Ö, Arslan İ, Okuturlar Y. Prognostic Factors and Clinical Features in Palliative Care Patients. Konuralp Medical Jour- nal. 2018;10 (1):74-80. (in Turkish) (DOI: 10.18521/ ktd.368