Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2

CAN PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY BE SAFELY PERFORMED ON OCTOGENARIANS?

Pages
220–226
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedure is an effective and safe method for treating renal stone disease in octogenarians.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: This study aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedure in octogenarians and compare them with the outcomes in a young patient group.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Patients older than 80 and younger than 90 were included in Group 1, and patients younger than 65 were assigned to Group 2.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedure is an effective and safe method for treating renal stone disease in octogenarians.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: This study aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedure in octogenarians and compare them with the outcomes in a young patient group. Materials and Methods: Patients older than 80 and younger than 90 were included in Group 1, and patients younger than 65 were assigned to Group 2. Group 1 included 45 patients, and Group 2 consisted of 90 patients recruited by one-to-two case-control matching based on gender, stone area, and the number of staghorn stones. Results: The mean patient age was 81.89 ± 1.70 and 38.7 ± 12.5 years in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. The patients in Group 1 had a significantly higher rate of systemic hypertension. Pre-operative and post-operative serum creatinine levels were higher in Group 1 than in Group 2. The groups did not differ in terms of the preoperative serum hemoglobin level. However, the postoperative serum hemoglobin level was significantly lower in Group 1. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of the rate of blood transfusions. The duration of hospital stay was significantly longer in Group 1. However, the two groups were not different in terms of minor and major complications. The stone-free rates were calculated as 73.3% and 77.8% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. There was no difference between the groups in terms of stone-free rates (p = 0.567). Conclusion: The percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedure is an effective and safe method for treating renal stone disease in octogenarians.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKARKEN, İ., TARHAN, H., KARAÖZ, F., DELİKTAŞ, H., ŞAHİN, H. (2021). CAN PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY BE SAFELY PERFORMED ON OCTOGENARIANS?. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2, 220–226. https://ajindex.com/articles/409061

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ghani KR, Andonian S, Bultitude M, et al. Percuta- neous Nephrolithotomy: Update, Trends, and Fu- ture Directions. Eur Urol. 2016; 70:382-96. (PMID: 26876328
  2. Okeke Z, Smith AD, Labate G, et al. Prospective comparison of outcomes of percutaneous nephro- lithotomy in elderly patients versus younger patients. J Endourol. 2012; 26:996-1001. (PMID: 22494028
  3. Akman T, Binbay M, Sari E, et al. Factors affect- ing bleeding during percutaneous nephrolithoto- my: Single surgeon experience. J Endourol. 2011; 25:327-33. (PMID: 21214412
  4. Nakamon T, Kitirattrakarn P, Lojanapiwat B. Out- comes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Compar- ison of elderly and younger patients. Int Braz J Urol. 2013; 39:692-701. (PMID: 24267112
  5. Morganstern B, Galli R, Motamedinia P, et al. Percu- taneous nephrolithotomy in octogenarians and be- yond: How old is too old? Asian J Urol. 2015; 2:208- 13. (PMID: 29264147
  6. Abedali ZA, Large T, Heiman JM, et al. Percutane- ous Nephrolithotomy in the 80 Years of Age and Older Population. Urology. 2019; 134:62-65. (PMID: 31536740
  7. Curhan GC. Epidemiology of Stone Disease. Urol Clin North Am. 2007; 34:287-93. (PMID:17678980
  8. Stoller ML, Bolton D, St. Lezin M, Lawrence M. Per- cutaneous nephrolithotomy in the elderly. Urology. 1994; 44:651-54. (PMID: 7974938
  9. Girgin R, Topaktaş R, Altın S, Aydın C, Akkoç A, Akduman B. The Effect of Charlson’s Comorbidity Index on Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications in Percutaneous Nephrolitotomy. J Urol Surg. 2016; 3:84-89. (DOI: 10.4274/jus.2016.890
  10. Skolarikos A, De La Rosette J. Prevention and treat- ment of complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Curr Opin Urol. 2008; 18:229-34. (PMID: 18303550
  11. Seitz C, Desai M, Häcker A, et al. Incidence, preven- tion, and management of complications following percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy. Eur Urol. 2012; 61:146-58. (PMID: 21978422
  12. Buldu I, Tepeler A, Karatag T, et al. Does aging af- fect the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Urolithiasis. 2015; 43:183-87. (PMID: 25395249
  13. Şahin A, Atsü N, Erdem E, et al. Percutaneous neph- rolithotomy in patients aged 60 years or older. J En- dourol. 2001; 15:489-91. (PMID: 11465327
  14. Ng CF. The effect of age on outcomes in patients un- dergoing treatment for renal stones. Curr Opin Urol. 2009; 19:211-14. (PMID: 19195134
  15. Shoag J, Halpern J, Goldfarb DS, Eisner BH. Risk of chronic and end stage kidney disease in pa- tients with nephrolithiasis. J Urol. 20