Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2021 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of the Efficacy of Entecavir and Tenofovir in Reducing Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: A Real-Life Study in Turkey

Pages
412–421
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Entecavir and tenofovir are similarly effective in reducing HCC risk in CHB patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: It is controversial whether entecavir or tenofovir differs in reducing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This retrospective study included 607 nucleos(t)ide naive CHB patients who had received entecavir or tenofovir.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Entecavir and tenofovir are similarly effective in reducing HCC risk in CHB patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background: It is controversial whether entecavir or tenofovir differs in reducing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk. We aimed to compare the efficacy of entecavir and tenofovir in reducing HCC risk in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Methods: This retrospective study included 607 nucleos(t)ide naive CHB patients who had received entecavir or tenofovir. Patients who developed HCC during the first 12 months of therapy were excluded. Cumulative HCC incidences at years 2, 3, 4, 5 and 10 were compared between entecavir and tenofovir groups. Factors associated with HCC were determined by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Nineteen (3.1%) patients developed HCC, 12 (4.8%) in entecavir group and 7 (1.9%) in tenofovir group (P = .045). In the entire cohort, cumulative HCC incidences at years 2, 3, 4, 5 and 10 were 1.8%, 2.9%, 4.4%, 5.2% and 9.9% in entecavir group, and 0.6%, 2.4%, 2.4%, 2.4% and 3.7% in tenofovir group, respectively (log-rank P = .130). In multivariate analysis, age ≥50 years, cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, high GGT and low platelet levels were associated with HCC in the entire cohort. In advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis cohort, cumulative HCC incidences at years 2, 3, 4, 5 and 10 were 4.6%, 7.1%, 8.6%, 12.1% and 15.5% in entecavir group, and 1.8%, 5.6%, 5.6%, 5.6% and 8.5% in tenofovir group, respectively (log-rank P = .267). In multivariate analysis, age ≥50 years, decompensated cirrhosis, high GGT and low platelet levels were associated with HCC in the advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis cohort. Conclusion: Entecavir and tenofovir are similarly effective in reducing HCC risk in CHB patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜZELBULUT, F., SALTÜRK, A. G. D., GÖKÇEN, P., ADALI, G., ASLAN, E., DOĞANAY, H. L., CAN, G., OZDIL, K. (2021). Comparison of the Efficacy of Entecavir and Tenofovir in Reducing Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: A Real-Life Study in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4, 412–421. https://ajindex.com/articles/408881

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. European Association for the Study of the Liver. Electronic address: [email protected], European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2017;67(2):370-398. [CrossRef]
  2. Chen CJ, Yang HI, Iloeje UH, REVEAL-HBV Study Group. Hepatitis B virus DNA levels and outcomes in chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2009;49(5)(suppl):S72-S84. [CrossRef]
  3. Terrault NA, Lok ASF, McMahon BJ, et al. Update on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: AASLD 2018 hepatitis B guidance. Hepatology. 2018;67(4):1560-1599. [CrossRef]
  4. Liaw YF, Sung JJ, Chow WC, et al. Lamivudine for patients with chronic hepatitis B and advanced liver disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(15):1521-1531. [CrossRef]
  5. Dienstag JL, Goldin RD, Heathcote EJ, et al. Histological outcome during long-term lamivudine therapy. Gastroenterology. 2003;124(1):105-117. [CrossRef]
  6. Chang TT, Liaw YF, Wu SS, et al. Long-term entecavir therapy results in the reversal of fibrosis/cirrhosis and continued histological improvement in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2010;52(3):886-893. [CrossRef]
  7. Marcellin P, Gane E, Buti M, et al. Regression of cirrhosis during treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for chronic hepatitis B: a 5-year open-label follow-up study. Lancet. 2013;381(9865):468- 475. [CrossRef]
  8. Hosaka T, Suzuki F, Kobayashi M, et al. Long-term entecavir treatment reduces hepatocellular carcinoma incidence in patients with hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatology. 2013;58(1):98-107. [CrossRef]
  9. Kim WR, Loomba R, Berg T, et al. Impact of long-term tenofovir disoproxil fumarate on incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Cancer. 2015;121(20):3631-3638. [CrossRef]
  10. Papatheodoridis GV, Sypsa V, Dalekos G, et al. Eight-year survival in chronic hepatitis B patients under long-term entecavir or tenofovir therapy is similar to the general population. J Hepatol. 2018;68(6):1129-1136. [CrossRef]. Epub 2018 Feb 8
  11. Hsu YC, Wong GL, Chen CH, et al. Tenofovir Versus entecavir for hepatocellular carcinoma prevention in an international Consortium of Chronic Hepatitis B. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115(2):271-280. [CrossRef]
  12. Kim SU, Seo YS, Lee HA, et al. A multicenter study of entecavir vs. tenofovir on prognosis of treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B in South Korea. J Hepatol. 2019;71(3):456-464. [CrossRef]
  13. Lee SW,