Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2021 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4

Reliability and Validity Study of Turkish Version of Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptom Scores® (Tr-PEESS v2.0) Led to Development of a New Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Scale: GaziESAS

Pages
363–373
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Keywords: Children, eosinophilic esophagitis, reliability, scale, validity

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: There has been no valid and reliable Turkish scale that measures symptoms in children with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of the study is to test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptom Scores® (Tr-PEESS v2.0).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Keywords: Children, eosinophilic esophagitis, reliability, scale, validity
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background: There has been no valid and reliable Turkish scale that measures symptoms in children with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). The aim of the study is to test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptom Scores® (Tr-PEESS v2.0). Methods: Relevant forms of Tr-PEESS v2.0 were applied to 2-18 years old children with EoE and to their parents. KINDL QoL patient and parent questionnaires and the GaziESAS scale developed in this study were used to test the convergent validity of Tr-PEESS v2.0. Discriminant validity was evaluated among 3 EoE treatment groups: under treatment, off treatment due to remission, and uncompliant with treatment. Reliability was evaluated by internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and item analysis. Results: Fifty-two children/teens (mean age 130.2 ± 60.3 months) and 84 parents were interviewed twice one week apart. The mean duration of EoE was 47.2 ± 35.6 months. Tr-PEESS v2.0 reports correlated with GaziESAS (range 0.361-0.855) and KINDL QoL questionnaires (range −0.316 to 0.413). Parent report of Tr-PEESS v2.0 discriminated children uncompliant with treatment from the ones off treatment and undertreatment. Cronbach’s α values and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) values of Tr-PEESS v2.0 ranged from 0.614-0. 895 and 0.646-0.910, respectively. Conclusion: Tr-PEESS v2.0 is a valid and reliable tool to use in Turkish children. GaziESAS is a new parent-proxy pediatric EoE scale with an additional adaptive behavior domain that passed scale developmental stages successfully for Turkish children with EoE. Keywords: Children, eosinophilic esophagitis, reliability, scale, validity

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAGOL, H. I. E., BAKIRTAŞ, A., YAPAR, D., İLHAN, M. N., GÜRKAN, Ö. E., SARI, S., DALGIÇ, B. (2021). Reliability and Validity Study of Turkish Version of Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptom Scores® (Tr-PEESS v2.0) Led to Development of a New Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Scale: GaziESAS. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4, 363–373. https://ajindex.com/articles/408878

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Munoz-Persy M, Lucendo AJ. Treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis in the pediatric patient: an evidence-based approach. Eur J Pediatr. 2018;177(5):649-663. [CrossRef]
  2. Hirano I, Furuta GT. Approaches and challenges to management of pediatric and adult patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(4):840-851. [CrossRef]
  3. Franciosi JP, Hommel KA, DeBrosse CW, et al. Development of a validated patient-reported symptom metric for pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis: qualitative methods. BMC Gastroenterol. 2011;11:126. [CrossRef]
  4. Martin LJ, Franciosi JP, Collins MH, et al. Pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis symptom scores (PEESS v2.0) identify histologic and molecular correlates of the key clinical features of disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135(6):1519-28.e8. [CrossRef]. 5.Lucendo AJ, Molina-Infante J, Arias Á, et al. Guidelines on eosinophilic esophagitis: evidence-based statements and recommendations for diagnosis and management in children and adults.U Eur Gastroenterol J. 2017;5(3):335-358. [CrossRef]
  5. Mapi research trust. France: PEESS v2.0 contact information and permission to use. http://www.mapitrust.org; 2020. 7.Ravens-Sieberer U, Erhart M, Wille N, et al. Generic health-related quality-of-life assessment in children and adolescents: methodological considerations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(12):1199- 1220. [CrossRef]
  6. Eser E, Yüksel H, Baydur H, et al. The psychometric properties of the new Turkish generic health-related quality of life questionnaire for children (Kid-KINDL). Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2008;19(4):409-417. PMID: 19110983 9. Ebadi A, Zarshenas L, Rakhshan M, et al. Fundamentals of Scale Validation in Health Sciences. Tehran, Iran: Jame’e Negar; 2016 ( in Persian)
  7. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol. 1975;28(4):563-575. [CrossRef]
  8. Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV.: Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):459-467. [CrossRef]
  9. Davis LL. Instrument review: getting the most from your panel of experts. Appl Nurs Res ANR. 1992;5(4):194-197. [CrossRef]
  10. Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(1):231-240. [CrossRef]
  11. Gregory R. J. Psychology Testing: History, Principles, and Applications. 5th ed; 2007. Boston: Ally & Bacon. (w)
  12. Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation coefficients: app