Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2021 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Mucin Expression in Mucinous Pancreatic Cysts: Can String Sign Test Predict Mucin Types? A Single Center Pilot Study

Pages
187–193
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

MUC4 expression showed mild agreement with the SS test in a small number of patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Mucinous pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) express different mucin (MUC) types according to their histomorphologic types.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Prespecified MUC types (MUC1, MUC2, MUC4, MUC5AC, and MUC6) were evaluated in 18 definitively diagnosed mucinous PCLs with sufficient tissue material and prediagnostic cyst fluid viscosity evaluation—string sign (SS)—test.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:MUC4 expression showed mild agreement with the SS test in a small number of patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background: Mucinous pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) express different mucin (MUC) types according to their histomorphologic types. High cystic fluid viscosity may help in the detection of mucinous PCLs. We hypothesized that high cystic fluid viscosity may be suggestive of a certain MUC type in mucinous PCLs. Methods: Prespecified MUC types (MUC1, MUC2, MUC4, MUC5AC, and MUC6) were evaluated in 18 definitively diagnosed mucinous PCLs with sufficient tissue material and prediagnostic cyst fluid viscosity evaluation—string sign (SS)—test. We evaluated the agreement of MUC expression with positive SS test results. Later, we compared cystic fluid carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) between the prespecified MUC expressing and nonexpressing cyst types. Results: A total of 18 mucinous PCL patients, 11 females, with mean age ± SD (59.7 ± 13.3) were included. Almost all malignant mucinous PCLs expressed MUC1 (71.4%) (P = .023). We found no significant agreement between the prespecified MUC types and positive SS, except MUC4 which had mild agreement. Also, no significant relation was found between cystic fluid CEA levels and MUC expression (P = .584). Conclusion: We did not detect a significantly moderate or good agreement between the prespecified MUC types and SS test. MUC1 was highly expressed in malignant mucinous cysts; however, it was incompatible with the SS test. MUC4 expression showed mild agreement with the SS test in a small number of patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖKER, İ. H., ÜNVER, N., MALYA, F. Ü., UYSAL, Ö., KESKİN, E. B., ŞENTÜRK, H. (2021). Mucin Expression in Mucinous Pancreatic Cysts: Can String Sign Test Predict Mucin Types? A Single Center Pilot Study. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 187–193. https://ajindex.com/articles/408630

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Basturk O, Coban I, Adsay NV. Pancreatic cysts. Pathologic classification, differential diagnosis, and clinical implications. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133(3):423-438. [CrossRef] 2. Şentürk H. Management of cystic diseases of the pancreas. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2014;25(1):1-18. [CrossRef] 3. Han Y, Lee H, Kang JS, et al. Progression of pancreatic branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm associates with cyst size. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(3):576-584. [CrossRef] 4. Lewandrowski KB, Southern JF, Pins MR, Compton CC, Warshaw AL. Cyst fluid analysis in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cysts. A comparison of pseudocysts, serous cystadenomas, mucinous cystic neoplasms, and mucinous cyst adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 1993;217(1):41-47. [CrossRef] 5. Morris-Stiff G, Lentz G, Chalikonda S, et al. Pancreatic cyst aspiration analysis for cystic neoplasms: mucin or carcinoembryonic antigen- which is better? Surgery. 2010;148(4):638-644. [CrossRef] 6. Moschovis D, Bamias G, Delladetsima I. Mucins in neoplasms of pancreas, ampulla of Vater and biliary system. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016;8(10):725-734. [CrossRef] 7. Higashi M, Yokoyama S, Yamamoto T, et al. Mucin (MUC) expression in EUS-FNA specimens is a useful prognostic factor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreas. 2015;44(5):728-734. [CrossRef] 8.Bick BL, Enders FT, Levy MJ, et al. The string sign for diagnosis of mucinous pancreatic cysts. Endoscopy. 2015;47(7):626-631. [CrossRef] 9. Basturk O, Hong SM, Wood LD, et al. A revised classification system and recommendations from the Baltimore Consensus meeting for neoplastic precursor lesions in the pancreas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39(12):1730-1741. [CrossRef] 10. Adsay NV, Fukushima N, Furukawa T, et al. Intraductal neoplasms of the pancreas. In: Bosman FT, Caneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND, eds. WHO Classification of Tumors of the Digestive System. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2010:304-313. 11. Basturk O, Chung SM, Hruban RH, et al. Distinct pathways of pathogenesis of intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasms and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Virchows Arch. 2016;469(5):523-532. [CrossRef] 12. Suh H, Pillai K, Morris DL. Mucins in pancreatic cancer: biological role, implications in carcinogenesis and applications in diagnosis and therapy. Am J Cancer Res. 2017;7(6):1372-1383. 13. Ringel J, Löhr M. The MUC gene family: their role in diagnosis and early detection of pancreatic cancer. Mol Cancer. 2003;2:9. 14. MacDe