Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2021 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Preoperative Alpha-Fetoprotein Has No Prognostic Role in Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Non-Cirrhotic Patients After Surgical Resection

Pages
133–140
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: AFP levels have no predictive value in well-compensated non-cirrhosis patients with single, small HCC (≤3 cm) treated with surgical resection for curative intent.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) has been widely used as a tumor marker in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Among the 111 374 liver cancer patients included in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we selected 224 patients without cirrhosis with a single HCC ≤3 cm in diameter who were identified at diagnosis and treated with surgical resection.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: AFP levels have no predictive value in well-compensated non-cirrhosis patients with single, small HCC (≤3 cm) treated with surgical resection for curative intent.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background: Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) has been widely used as a tumor marker in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis. However, a large number of HCC patients are diagnosed without cirrhosis, and the prognostic capability of AFP was unclear in HCC patients without cirrhosis. Our purpose was to investigate the prognostic efficiency of AFP in patients with noncirrhosis, single, and small HCC who were treated with surgical resection. Methods: Among the 111 374 liver cancer patients included in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we selected 224 patients without cirrhosis with a single HCC ≤3 cm in diameter who were identified at diagnosis and treated with surgical resection. The AFP test results were recorded as AFP-positive and AFP-negative levels. Results: Kaplan–Meier method showed that there was no significant survival difference between the AFP-positive and AFP-negative groups (P = .566). The same results were found in the subgroups of patients with tumor size ≤2 cm and 2-3 cm (P = .710 and .687, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that AFP had inadequate accuracy to discriminate survivors and deceased patients in subgroups of patients with tumor size ≤3 cm, 2-3 cm, or ≤2 cm (area under the ROC curve = 0.449, 0.458, 0.443; 95% confidence interval = 0.366-0.533, 0.346-0.571, 0.317-0.569, respectively). Conclusion: AFP levels have no predictive value in well-compensated non-cirrhosis patients with single, small HCC (≤3 cm) treated with surgical resection for curative intent.

🔖

Cite This Article

GAO, T., BAİ, D., QIAN, J., CHEN, P., JİN, S., JİANG, G. (2021). Preoperative Alpha-Fetoprotein Has No Prognostic Role in Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Non-Cirrhotic Patients After Surgical Resection. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 133–140. https://ajindex.com/articles/408628

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Bruix J, Sherman M, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology. 2011;53(3):1020-1022. [CrossRef] 2. Taylor-Robinson SD, Foster GR, Arora S, Hargreaves S, Thomas HC. Increase in primary liver cancer in the UK, 1979-1994. Lancet. 1997;350(9085):1142-1143. [CrossRef] 3. Deuffic S, Poynard T, Buffat L, Valleron AJ. Trends in primary liver cancer. Lancet. 1998;351(9097):214-215. [CrossRef] 4. El-Serag HB, Mason AC. Rising incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(10):745-750. [CrossRef] 5. Witjes CDM, Karim-Kos HE, Visser O, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in a low endemic area: rising incidence and improved survival. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;24(4):450-457. [CrossRef] 6. Kamarajah SK. Fibrosis score impacts survival following resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): a surveillance, end results and epidemiology (SEER) database analysis. Asian J Surg. 2018;41(6):551- 561. [CrossRef] 7. Martin RC, Loehle J, Scoggins CR, McMasters KM. Kentucky hepatoma: epidemiologic variant or same problem in a different region? Arch Surg. 2007;142(5):431-436; discussion 436-437. [CrossRef] 8. Sherman M. Hepatocellular carcinoma: screening and staging. Clin Liver Dis. 2011;15(2):323-334, vii. [CrossRef] 9. Llovet JM, Brú C, Bruix J. Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification. Semin Liver Dis. 1999;19(3):329- 338. [CrossRef] 10. Tandon P, Garcia-Tsao G. Prognostic indicators in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review of 72 studies. Liver Int. 2009;29(4):502-510. [CrossRef] 11. Pompili M, Rapaccini GL, Covino M, et al. Prognostic factors for survival in patients with compensated cirrhosis and small hepatocellular carcinoma after percutaneous ethanol injection therapy. Cancer. 2001;92(1):126-135. [CrossRef] 12. Huo TI, Huang YH, Lui WY, et al. Selective prognostic impact of serum alpha-fetoprotein level in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of 543 patients in a single center. Oncol Rep. 2004;11(2):543-550. 13. Kim HS, Park JW, Jang JS, et al. Prognostic values of a-fetoprotein and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. A prospective study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;43(5):482-488. [CrossRef] 14. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence – SEER 9 Regs Research Data, Nov 20