Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2022 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3

In Vitro and In Vivo Effects of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Aspirin on Rabbit Esophageal Epithelium

Pages
257–270
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The combination of harmless doses of ibuprofen and acid demonstrated that even low acidic conditions can create a disruptive environment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease has a high incidence of 23%, with 29% of those with gastroesophageal reflux disease consuming nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Doses of 1 mg/mL, 2.5 mg/mL, 5 mg/mL ibuprofen, naproxen, and aspirin were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide and added to the luminal side.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The combination of harmless doses of ibuprofen and acid demonstrated that even low acidic conditions can create a disruptive environment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease has a high incidence of 23%, with 29% of those with gastroesophageal reflux disease consuming nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. There are insufficient data concerning the effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the esophageal tissue. We aimed to examine the effects of well-known nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs using electrophysiologic criteria on the rabbit esophageal epithelium. Methods: Esophageal epithelium mounted on Ussing chambers enabled in vitro investigation of the electrophysiological properties. Doses of 1 mg/mL, 2.5 mg/mL, 5 mg/mL ibuprofen, naproxen, and aspirin were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide and added to the luminal side. Esophagi were cannulated from both sides for the administration of high-dose ibuprofen in vivo, and the potential difference was monitored. Results: Ibuprofen and aspirin inhibited tissue transport functions in a dose-dependent manner. pH 4 acid and 0.1 mg/mL ibuprofen alone were not harmful; however, the combination of these agents had an additive and significance effect: 78% decrease in the potential difference and 85% decrease in the short-circuited current (Isc). The change in the potential difference in the in vivo experiments (5 mg/mL ibuprofen) was similar (52 ± 7% decrease) with in vitro experiments in the first 30 minutes. Conclusion: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were harmful to the rabbit esophageal epithelium in both the in vitro and in vivo experiments. Even though aspirin and ibuprofen affected the transport mechanisms of the esophageal epithelium, the dose-dependent decrease of tissue potential difference and Isc with ibuprofen was more pronounced than those with aspirin. The combination of harmless doses of ibuprofen and acid demonstrated that even low acidic conditions can create a disruptive environment.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIPÇAK, S., ÇAĞANOĞLU, D., ERGÜN, P., BOR, S. (2022). In Vitro and In Vivo Effects of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Aspirin on Rabbit Esophageal Epithelium. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3, 257–270. https://ajindex.com/articles/408412

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Vane JR, Botting RM. The mechanism of action of aspirin. Thromb Res. 2003;110(5-6):255-258. [CrossRef] 2. Bor S, Sarıtaş Yüksel E. How is the gastroesophageal reflux disease prevalence, incidence, and frequency of complications (stricture/ esophagitis/Barrett's esophagus/carcinoma) in Turkey compared to other geographical regions globally? Turk J Gastroenterol. 2017;28(Suppl 1):S4-S9. [CrossRef] 3. Lanza FL, Chan FK, Quigley EM, Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Guidelines for prevention of NSAID-related ulcer complications. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(3):728-738. [CrossRef] 4. Bor S, Daglı U, Sarer B, et al. A retrospective study on the pathogenetic factors in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Turkey. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2011;22(3):249-254. [CrossRef] 5. McCarthy DM. Prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal symptoms and complications due to NSAIDs. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;15(5):755-773. [CrossRef] 6. Bor S, Mandıracıoglu A, Kitapçıoğlu G, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux in a low-income region in Turkey. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:744-745. 7. Ricciotti E, FitzGerald GA. Prostaglandins and inflammation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31(5):986-1000. [CrossRef] 8. Cryer B, Feldman M. Cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2 selectivity of widely used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Am J Med. 1998;104(5):413-421. [CrossRef] 9. Yeomans ND, Lanas AI, Talley NJ, et al. Prevalence and incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers during treatment with vascular protective doses of aspirin. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;22(9):795-801. [CrossRef] 10. García Rodríguez LA, Jick H. Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation associated with individual non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Lancet. 1994;343(8900):769-772. [CrossRef] 11. Goddard PJ, Hills BA, Lichtenberger LM. Does aspirin damage canine gastric mucosa by reducing its surface hydrophobicity? Am J Physiol. 1987;252(3 Pt 1):G421-G430. [CrossRef] 12. Schoen RT, Vender RJ. Mechanisms of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastric damage. Am J Med. 1989;86(4):449- 458. [CrossRef] 13. Meyer RA, McGinley D, Posalaky Z. Effects of aspirin on tight junction structure of the canine gastric mucosa. Gastroenterology. 1986;91(2):351-359. [CrossRef] 14. Wang F, Lv ZS, Fu YK. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and esophageal inflammation - Barrett's esophagus - adenocarcinoma sequence: a meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus. 2011;2