Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2022 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2

Factors influencing radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary intervention in the Indian population

Pages
105–111
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: RAO was not an uncommon complication in transradial coronary interventions, especially in the Indian population; and the knowledge of predictors may be helpful in its prevention.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Radial artery occlusion (RAO) is a common complication during transradial coronary intervention.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This was a single-center prospective study (October 2018 to September 2019) that enrolled 1,754 patients who were evaluated for RAO 24 hours after transradial coronary intervention.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: RAO was not an uncommon complication in transradial coronary interventions, especially in the Indian population; and the knowledge of predictors may be helpful in its prevention.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Radial artery occlusion (RAO) is a common complication during transradial coronary intervention. Its incidence is variably reported in literature and its predictors are not completely understood. In this study, we aimed to define the incidence and factors influencing RAO in patients undergoing transradial coronary intervention. Methods: This was a single-center prospective study (October 2018 to September 2019) that enrolled 1,754 patients who were evaluated for RAO 24 hours after transradial coronary intervention. Univariate as well as multivariate analyses were done to identify patient and procedure related factors predicting the occurrence of RAO. Results: A total of 1,374 patients (78.3%) underwent angioplasty, whereas 380 (21.7%) underwent angiography alone. RAO was diagnosed in 11.97% patients. Lower glomerular filtration rate, multiple puncture attempts for radial artery access, larger sheath size, complex nature of interventional procedure, longer homeostasis time, and forearm hematoma formation were independent predictors for RAO. Conclusion: RAO was not an uncommon complication in transradial coronary interventions, especially in the Indian population; and the knowledge of predictors may be helpful in its prevention.

🔖

Cite This Article

DWİVEDİ, S. K., SHARMA, A., NAYAK, G. R., CHAUDHARY, G., CHANDRA, S., PRADHAN, A., VİSHWAKARMA, P., BHANDARİ, M., SETHİ, R. (2022). Factors influencing radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary intervention in the Indian population. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2, 105–111. https://ajindex.com/articles/407442

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Rao SV, Ou F-S, Wang TY, Roe MT, Brindis R, Rumsfeld JS, et al. Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008
  2. [Crossref] 2. Asrar Ul Haq M, Tsay IM, Dinh DT, Brennan A, Clark D, Cox N, et al. Prevalence and outcomes of trans-radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practise. Int J Cardiol 2016
  3. [Crossref] 3. Mattea V, Salomon C, Menck N, Lauten P, Malur FM, Schade A, et al. Low rate of access site complications after transradial coronary catheterization: A prospective ultrasound study. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc 2017
  4. [Crossref] 4. Cheng KY, Chair SY, Choi KC. Access site complications and puncture site pain following transradial coronary procedures: a correlational study. Int J Nurs Stud 2013
  5. [Crossref] 5. Baklanov DV, Kaltenbach LA, Marso SP, Subherwal SS, Feldman DN, Garratt KN, et al. The prevalence and outcomes of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: analysis from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (2007 to 2011). J Am Coll Cardiol 2013
  6. [Crossref] 6. Valgimigli M, Frigoli E, Leonardi S, Vranckx P, Rothenbühler M, Tebaldi M, et al. Radial versus femoral access and bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in invasively managed patients with acute coronary syndrome (MATRIX): final 1-year results of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2018
  7. [Crossref] 7. Ferrante G, Rao SV, Jüni P, Da Costa BR, Reimers B, Condorelli G, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary interventions across the entire spectrum of patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016
  8. [Crossref] 8. Avdikos G, Karatasakis A, Tsoumeleas A, Lazaris E, Ziakas A, Koutouzis M. Radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary catheterization. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2017
  9. [Crossref] 9. Zhou Y, Zhao Y, Cao Z, Fu X, Nie B, Liu Y, et al. Incidence and risk factors of acute radial artery occlusion following transradial percutaneous coronary intervention. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2007
  10. [Article in Chinese] 10. Garg N, Madan B, Khanna R, Sinha A, Kapoor A, Tewari S, et al. Incidence and predictors of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary angioplasty: Doppler-guided fol