Journals / Journal of Eta Maritime Science / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

Developing a Scale to Measure the Institutionalization Level of Maritime Family Businesses

Pages
243–255
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, the implications of the study were discussed and suggestions were given for additional studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Institutionalization is an important strategy that can help family businesses survive in developing market conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Measuring the institutionalization level of companies can improve the understanding of current corporate governance statuses and reveal institutionalization problems.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, the implications of the study were discussed and suggestions were given for additional studies.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Institutionalization is an important strategy that can help family businesses survive in developing market conditions. Measuring the institutionalization level of companies can improve the understanding of current corporate governance statuses and reveal institutionalization problems. Here, we developed a scale to measure the institutionalization level of maritime family businesses. Data obtained by questionnaires from 193 office employees in 177 Turkish family-owned ship management companies were analyzed by exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis via structural equation modeling in the SPSS 23.0 and AMOS 23.0 statistical programs as quantitative methods. Following rigorous scale development procedures, a scale was developed consisting of 14 items and three dimensions. The three dimensions are effective organizational structure, internal audit, and transfer of authority. Based on the results, the scale was determined to be reliable and valid. Finally, the implications of the study were discussed and suggestions were given for additional studies.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, B., TAVACIOĞLU, L. (2021). Developing a Scale to Measure the Institutionalization Level of Maritime Family Businesses. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 243–255. https://ajindex.com/articles/407295

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. E. J. Poza, and M. S. Daugherty, Family business. (4 th Edition). Boston: Cengage Learning, 2020
  2. Alphaliner TOP 100/30 Nov 2021. [Online] Available: https:// alphaliner.axsmarine.com/PublicTop100; [Accessed: Feb. 02, 2021]
  3. I. Le Breton-Miller, and D. Miller, “Why do some family businesses out-compete? Governance, long-term orientations, and sustainable capability,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 30, pp. 731-746, May 2006
  4. F. Neubauer, and A. G. Lank, The family business: Its governance for sustainability. New York: Springer, 2016 [5] E. R. Brenes, K. Madrigal, and B. Requena, “Corporate governance and family business performance,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 64, pp. 280-285, Dec 2011
  5. M. Ungerer, and C. Mienie, “A family business success map to enhance the sustainability of a multi-generational family business,” I nternational Journal of Family Business and Management Studies, vol. 2, pp. 1-13, March 2018
  6. İ. Yazıcıoğlu, and K. Hakan, “Aile işletmelerinin kurumsallaşma düzeylerinin belirlenmesine yönelik karşılaştırmalı bir araştırma,” Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 21, pp. 497-507, Jun 2009
  7. E. Karpuzoğlu, Aile şirketlerinin sürekliliğinde kurumsallaşma. (Ed. Koçel, T)
  8. Aile İşletmeleri Kongresi (42-53). İstanbul: TC İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi, 2004
  9. K. O. Turhaner, and S. Nas, “Determining the level of institutionalization in family-owned shipping businesses,” Journal of ETA Maritime Science, vol. 9, pp. 138-153, Sep 2021
  10. E. N. Giannakopoulou, E. I. Thalassinos, and T. V. Stamatopoulos, “Corporate governance in shipping: An overview,” Maritime Policy & Management, vol. 43, pp. 19-38, Nov 2016
  11. J. Li, K. Lam, J. Sun, and S. Liu, “Strategic human resource management, institutionalization, and employment modes: An empirical study in China,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 29, pp. 337-342, March 2008
  12. I. Metin, and B. Çiçek, “İnsan kaynakları uygulamalarının kurumsallaşma algısı üzerindeki öncüllük rolü,” Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 17, pp. 128-149, Dec 2019
  13. E. Bayer, “Entellektüel sermaye ve bileşenlerinin işletmelerin kurumsallaşma süreçlerine etkilerinin geliştirilmesinde yöneticilerin liderlik rollerinin belirlenmesi,” Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 3, pp. 89-102, Feb 2005
  14. F. Sarvan, E. D. Arıcı, J. Özen, B. Özdemir, and E. T. İçigen, “Ön stratejik yönetim okulu: Biçimleşme okulunun bütünleştirici çerçevesi,” Akdeniz Ü