Journals / Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia / 2021 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Perfusion Index As A Predictor of Successful Spinal Anesthesia: A Time-Dependent Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve Analysis

Pages
125–130
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Adaptation of the study findings to the operation room practice may be considered for the patients with limited compliance to the pinprick test.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in perfusion index (PI), skin temperature, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) during spinal anesthesia and to determine the success of spinal anesthesia using the PI values.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total of 128 patients belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists’ physical status I-II undergoing elective surgery under spinal anesthesia at the T10 level were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Adaptation of the study findings to the operation room practice may be considered for the patients with limited compliance to the pinprick test.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in perfusion index (PI), skin temperature, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) during spinal anesthesia and to determine the success of spinal anesthesia using the PI values. Methods: A total of 128 patients belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists’ physical status I-II undergoing elective surgery under spinal anesthesia at the T10 level were included in this study. MAP, heart rate, body temperature, PI, and spinal anesthesia level, determined with the pinprick test, were recorded from baseline to 30 min following anesthesia induction. Repeated measures ANOVA test was used to evaluate changes after spinal block and linear mixed models were created. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves, using post-anesthetic 2nd min PI measurements and time to T10 spinal anesthesia level, were estimated to predict further successful spinal blockade. In addition, standard ROC curve analysis was performed for the PI ratios. Results: There was a significant linear increase in PI values (β=0.14, standard error = 0.01, p<0.001). Time-dependent ROC curves became significant for the post-anesthetic 6th min and after. Specificity was 100% after the 15th min. The cutoff value of post-anesthetic 2nd min PI was 2.4 (Area under the ROC curve-AUC: 0.71, 95% confidence interval: 0.59–0.83, sensitivity: 47%, specificity: 100%) to predict successful spinal blockage for the 15th min. In standard ROC curve analysis, only the 2nd min ROC curve revealed a significant AUC. Conclusion: All of the patients whose PI measurement at the 2nd min after the induction of anesthesia was above 2.4, reached the T10 spinal block level at the 15th min after induction. This finding must be supported by the increasing trend in PI individually. Adaptation of the study findings to the operation room practice may be considered for the patients with limited compliance to the pinprick test.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZTAŞ, N., ÖZBİLGİN, Ş., KARCI, A., AKAN, M., MUÇOĞLU, C. A., ARÇA, D. Ö., EMECEN, A. N. (2021). Perfusion Index As A Predictor of Successful Spinal Anesthesia: A Time-Dependent Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve Analysis. Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 125–130. https://ajindex.com/articles/407040

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Kelsaka E. Spinal anesthesia. Turk Klin 2015;8:41–52
  2. Curatolo M, Petersen-Felix S, Arendt-Nielsen L. Assessment of regional analgesia in humans: A review of methods and applications. Anesthesiology 2000;93:1517–30
  3. Abdelnasser A, Abdelhamid B, Elsonbaty A, Hasanin A, Rady A. Predicting successful supraclavicular brachial plexus block using pulse oximeter perfusion index. Br J Anesth 2017;119:276–80
  4. Galvin EM, Niehof S, Medina HJ, Zijlstra FJ, Bommel JV, Klein J, et al. Thermographic temperature measurement compared to pinprick and cold sensation in predicting the effectiveness of regional blockades. Anesth Analg 2006;102:598–604
  5. Butterworth J, Ririe G, Thompson RB, Walker FO, Jackson D, James RL. Differential onset of median nerve block: randomized, double- blind comparison of mepivacaine and bupivacaine in healthy volunteers. Br J Anaesth 1998;86:515–21
  6. Goldman JM, Petterson MT, Kopotic RJ, Barker SJ. Masimo signal extraction pulse oximetry. J Clin Monit Comput 2000;16:475–83
  7. Lima A, Beelen P, Bakker J. Use of a peripheral perfusion index derived from the pulse oximetry signal as a noninvasive indicator of perfusion. Crit Care Med 2002;30:1210–3
  8. Ginosar Y, Weiniger CF, Meroz Y, Kurz V, Bdolah-Abram T, Babchenko A, et al. Pulse oximeter perfusion index as an early indicator of sympathectomy after epidural anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009;53:1018–26
  9. Kus A, Gurkan Y, Gormus SK, Solak M, Toker K. Usefulness of perfusion index to detect the effect of brachial plexus block. J Clin Monit Comput 2013;27:325–8
  10. Hasanin A, Mukhtar A, Nassar H. Perfusion indices revisited. J Intensive Care 2017;5:24
  11. Hasanin A, Mohamed SA, El-Adawy A. Evaluation of perfusion index as a tool for pain assessment in critically ill patients. J Clin Monit Comput 2016;31:961–5
  12. Heagerty PJ, Lumley T, Pepe MS. Time-dependent ROC curves for censored survival data and a diagnostic marker. Biometrics 2000;56:337–44
  13. Blanche P, Dartigues JF, Jacqmin-Gadda H. Estimating and comparing time-dependent areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for censored event times with competing risks. Stat Med. 2013;32:5381–97
  14. Zaramella P, Freato F, Quaresima V, Ferrari M, Vianello A, Giongo D, et al. Foot pulse oximeter perfusion index correlates with calf muscle perfusion measured by near infra-red spectroscopy in healthy neonates. J Perinatol 2005;25:417–22
  15. Yamazaki H, Nishiyama J, Suzuki T. Use of perfusion index from pulse oxim