Journals / International Journal of Medical Biochemistry / 2021 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Flow cytometric evaluation of cancer stem cell markers in HepG2 cells following sorafenib treatment

Pages
200–204
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The results indicate that CSC expression varied according to the sorafenib dose administered, which sup ports the role of CSCs as novel pharmacological targets and highlights the importance of their characterization and the ability to identify them.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Liver cancer is a leading cause of mortality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study investigated the expression of CSC markers in HepG2 cells in response to low doses of sorafenib using flow cytometry.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The results indicate that CSC expression varied according to the sorafenib dose administered, which sup ports the role of CSCs as novel pharmacological targets and highlights the importance of their characterization and the ability to identify them.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: Liver cancer is a leading cause of mortality. Sorafenib resistance and cancer stem cells (CSCs) are among the factors that contribute to a poor prognosis. Different drugs enrich different CSC populations with a variety of CSC markers. This study investigated the expression of CSC markers in HepG2 cells in response to low doses of sorafenib using flow cytometry. Methods: The cytotoxicity of sorafenib was determined using a cell counting kit-8 assay. The expressions of the CSC markers CD44, CD90, and CD133 were measured with flow cytometry after treatment with sorafenib for 72 hours. Results: Sofranib inhibited cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. Low-dose sorafenib treatment increased CD44 expression; however, there was a decrease in the expression of CD133. An increasing trend was also seen in CD90 expression, but the difference was not significant. Conclusion: The results indicate that CSC expression varied according to the sorafenib dose administered, which sup ports the role of CSCs as novel pharmacological targets and highlights the importance of their characterization and the ability to identify them.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKIL, Y. D., SİTAR, M. E., ÖZÜNAL, Z. G., KAYALI, D., AKTAŞ, R. G. (2021). Flow cytometric evaluation of cancer stem cell markers in HepG2 cells following sorafenib treatment. International Journal of Medical Biochemistry, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 200–204. https://ajindex.com/articles/406970

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, Znaor A, Bray F. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview. Int J Cancer. 2021 Apr 5. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33588. Epub ahead of print 2. Siddique O, Yoo ER, Perumpail RB, Perumpail BJ, Liu A, Cholankeril G, et al. The importance of a multidisciplinary approach to hepatocellular carcinoma. J Multidiscip Healthc 2017
  2. Sun J-H, Luo Q, Liu L-L, Song G-B. Liver cancer stem cell markers: progression and therapeutic implications. World J Gastroenterol 2016
  3. 22(13):3547-57. 4. Yu Z, Pestell TG, Lisanti MP, Pestell RG. Cancer stem cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2012
  4. 44(12):2144-51. 5. Al-Hajj M, Wicha MS, Benito-Hernandez A, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF. Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003
  5. 100(7):3983-8. 6. Masciale V, Grisendi G, Banchelli F, D'Amico R, Maiorana A, Sighinolfi P, et al. Isolation and identification of cancer stemlike cells in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: a pilot study. Front Oncol 2019
  6. Yamashita T, Kaneko S. Liver cancer stem cells: recent progress in basic and clinical research. Regen Ther 2021
  7. Zhu YJ, Zheng B, Wang HY, Chen L. New knowledge of the mechanisms of sorafenib resistance in liver cancer. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2017
  8. 38(5):614-22. 9. Cabral LKD, Tiribelli C, Sukowati CHC. Sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma: the relevance of genetic heterogeneity. Cancers (Basel) 2020
  9. 12(6):1576. 10. Marisi G, Cucchetti A, Ulivi P, Canale M, Cabibbo G, Solaini L, et al. Ten years of sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: are there any predictive and/or prognostic markers? World J Gastroenterol 2018
  10. 24(36):4152-63. 11. Lin H, Zhang R, Wu W, Lei L. Comprehensive network analysis of the molecular mechanisms associated with sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Genet 2020
  11. Liu J, Qiu WC, Shen XY, Sun GC. Bioinformatics analysis revealed hub genes and pathways involved in sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Math Biosci Eng 2019
  12. 16(6):6319- 34. 13. Xia S, Pan Y, Liang Y, Xu J, Cai X. The microenvironmental and metabolic aspects of sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma. EBioMedicine 2020
  13. 102610. 14. Fernando J, Malfettone A, Cepeda EB, Vilarrasa-Blasi R, Bertran E, Raimondi G, et al. A mesenchymal-like phenotype and expression of CD44 predict lack of apoptotic response to sorafenib in liver tumor cells. Int J Cance