Journals / Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

Divergent Patterns of Variant Tag Questions in Pakistani English: A Corpus-based Comparative Study

Pages
370–378
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that declarative VTQs are preferred to seek and exchange information in both the varieties.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The research explores forms and function of variant tag questions (VTQs) in the native and non-native Englishes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The components of the International Corpus of English, henceforth ICE (Greenbaum & Nelson, 1996) of the said varieties, have been used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that declarative VTQs are preferred to seek and exchange information in both the varieties.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The research explores forms and function of variant tag questions (VTQs) in the native and non-native Englishes. For the said purpose, patterns of VTQs in Pakistani English are compared with two native (British and New Zealand) and two non-native (Indian and Singaporean) varieties. The components of the International Corpus of English, henceforth ICE (Greenbaum & Nelson, 1996) of the said varieties, have been used. Each ICE component consists of one- million-word corpus of the regional variety, with a common design, in order to ensure maximum comparability between the components (Nelson 1996). The ICE samples the English of adults (age 18 or over) who have been educated through medium of English to at least the end of secondary schooling. Convenient sampling technique is used to collect data. All the possible tags were extracted using AntConc 3.5.9 and the collocation were then studied. The results revealed that VTQs are under-used in non-native Englishes while least used in Pakistani English. As for the forms of VTQs, Pakistani speakers follow the native speakers and observe the grammatical rules. The functions of VTQs are analysed in Pakistani English, following Axelsson’s (2011) model, and compared with that of Indian English as both varieties share almost similar linguistic and sociocultural backgrounds. The results show that declarative VTQs are preferred to seek and exchange information in both the varieties. The research suggests that further linguistic entities may be explored to observe the similarities/differences in native and non-native varieties, including Indian and Pakistani Englishes, to establish their identities.

🔖

Cite This Article

HUSSAİN, Z., ASİF, M., ASLAM, A., MAHMOOD, M. A. (2021). Divergent Patterns of Variant Tag Questions in Pakistani English: A Corpus-based Comparative Study. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 370–378. https://ajindex.com/articles/406252

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Abbas, S. (1993). The power of English in Pakistan. World Englishes, 12(2), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1993. tb00017.x Algeo, J. (1990). It’sa myth, innit? Politeness and the English tag question. The State of the Language, 443-450.
  2. Anthony, L. (2020). AntConc (Version 3.5.9). Waseda University. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
  3. Asghar, S., Mahmood, M., & Asghar, Z. (2018). A multidimensional analysis of Pakistani legal English. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(5), 215. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel. v8n5p215 Axelsson, K. (2011). Tag questions in fiction dialogue. (Ph.D. thesis). University of Gothenburg Baratta, A. (2019). World Englishes in English language teaching. In World Englishes in English Language Teaching. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-030-13286-6
  4. Benhima, M., Tilwani, S. A., & Asif, M. (2021). English language learners’ use of translation and attitudes towards learning vocabulary. TESOL International Journal, 16(4.3), 157–175.
  5. Cheng, W., & Warren, W. (2000). She knows more about Hong Kong than you do isn’t it: Tags in Hong Kong conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1419–1439.
  6. Greenbaum, S., & Nelson, G. (1996). The international corpus of English (ICE) project. World Englishes, 15(1), 3–15. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1996.tb00088.x Hickey, R. (2005). Legacies of colonial English: Studies in transported dialects. In Legacies of Colonial English: Studies in Transported Dialects. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486920
  7. Hughes, A., Trudgill, P., & Watt, D. (2012). English accents & dialects (Fifth). Routledge. Hussain, Z., & Mahmood, M. A. (2014). Invariant tag questions in Pakistani English: a comparison with native and other non- native Englishes. Asian Englishes, 16(3), 229–238. https://doi. org/10.1080/13488678.2014.951465 Li, E. S. H., & Mahboob, A. (2013). English today: Forms, functions, and uses. Pearson Education Asia Limited. Khan, I., & Humaira. (2012). The evolution of Pakistani English (PakE) as a legitimate variety of English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 1(5), 90–99. https:// doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.5p.90 Kirkpatrick, A. (2021). The routledge handbook of world Englishes (Second). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1515/angl.2011.011
  8. Kochi, D. L. (2006). A task-based approach to teaching a content- based Canadian studies course in an EFL context. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 122–139.
  9. Mahboob, A. (2002). “No English, No Future” language p