Journals / Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

Can Innovative Learning Affect Students’ HOTS Achievements?: A Meta-Analysis Study

Pages
290–305
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The implication is that teachers or other practitioners can use innovative learning to improve students’ HOTS.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study looks at innovative learnings’ effect on achieving students’ High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:HOTS is one part of the skills that need to be developed in the 21st Century.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The implication is that teachers or other practitioners can use innovative learning to improve students’ HOTS.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This study looks at innovative learnings’ effect on achieving students’ High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). HOTS is one part of the skills that need to be developed in the 21st Century. This research is a quantitative study with a meta-analysis approach to the mean with random-effects models. Generally, the steps involve formulating research problems meta-analysis to be performed, collecting studies, calculating the effect size, test of heterogeneity, data analysis (summary effect, forest plots, funnel plots, test the potential for publication bias), and concludes. The research sample of 42 research includes international journals and national, international, and nationwide proceedings and a thesis student. The analysis using random models (random-effect model) obtained a mean value of the effect size of aggregation or summary effect amounted to 77.37, standard error weighs the mean 12.36, the upper limit of 53.14, and the lower limit of 101.60. Analysis of the null hypothesis (Ho: actual effect 𝜽 = 𝟎) leads to rejecting Ho because the 𝑍 value of the summary effect is 77.37 with the one-tailed p-value (0.00) smaller than the α value (0.05). Analysis of publication bias tests from Funnel Plot, Rank Correlation, Regression Method outputs, and “Trim and Fill” shows no potential publication bias regarding conclusions drawn. So the findings made based on the random effect model on the application of innovative learning affect HOTS students achievement (analyzing, evaluating, creating, critical and creative thinking skill aspects) are valid. The implication is that teachers or other practitioners can use innovative learning to improve students’ HOTS.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAEPUZAMAN, D., RETNAWATİ, H., ISTİYONO, E., Haryanto, H. (2021). Can Innovative Learning Affect Students’ HOTS Achievements?: A Meta-Analysis Study. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 290–305. https://ajindex.com/articles/406248

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Agustina, N., Imamora, M., & Chandra, A. N. (2020). Pengembangan Modul Berbasis Pembelajaran CTL Untuk Mencapai HOTS Pada Materi Getaran Harmonis. Proceeding IAIN Batusangkar, 1(3), 169–176.
  2. Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233–250. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01029.x Alandia, R. G., & Suparwoto, S. (2019). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Model Problem-Based Learning Berbantuan Web untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Keterampilan Proses Sains Peserta Didik SMA. In S2 thesis, Program Pascasarjana. http://eprints.uny.ac.id/id/ eprint/67333 Aljarrah, K., & Khataybeh, A. (2021). Representing teaching staff in Jordanian universities for the 21st century skills. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 11(3), 17–25.
  3. Ambarita, R. A., Yunastiti, Y., & Indriayu, M. (2019). The Application of Group Investigation Based on Hands on Activities to Improve Learning Outcomes Based on Higher Order Thinking Skills of Students at SMA Negeri 2 Pematangsiantar. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 2(2), 351–359. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle. v2i2.310 Anazifa, R. D., & Djukri. (2017). Project- based learning and problem- based learning: Are they effective to improve student’s thinking skills? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 346–355. https:// doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.11100 Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing. Longman, New York. Apino, E., & Retnawati, H. (2017). Developing Instructional Design to Improve Mathematical Higher Order Thinking Skills of Students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812(1), 12100. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012100
  4. Apino, Ezi, & Retnawati, H. (2016). Creative Problem Solving to Improve Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills in Mathematics Instructions. Proceeding of 3Rd International Conference on Research, Implementation and Education of Mathematics and Science, May, 339–346.
  5. Arends, R. I., & Kilcher, A. (2010). Teaching for student learning: Becoming an accomplished teacher. In Teaching for Student Learning: Becoming an Accomplished Teacher. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203866771
  6. Ariansyah, D., & Soenarto, S. (201