Journals / Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 73

Introduction to the Special Issue Anxiety and Change in International Relations

Pages
1–11
Publication Date
2022-04-09
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, today, the uncertainties surrounding the future of the world order, unanticipated crises like the COVID-19 pandemic that radically change our lives, unforeseeable terrorist attacks, and the unexplainable lure of radical fundamentalist ideologies all evoke a pervasive anxiety about what we do not know and what we cannot control, rather than the fear of a specific and known enemy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Despite being the prevailing emotion of our times, anxiety has received scant attention in the international relations discipline.
📊
Key Findings & Data:While political theorists and philosophers have long paid attention to anxiety as distinct from and constitutive of fear, international relations theory has assumed that much of international behavior is guided by fears of specific threats to state survival.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, today, the uncertainties surrounding the future of the world order, unanticipated crises like the COVID-19 pandemic that radically change our lives, unforeseeable terrorist attacks, and the unexplainable lure of radical fundamentalist ideologies all evoke a pervasive anxiety about what we do not know and what we cannot control, rather than the fear of a specific and known enemy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anxiety · Change · International Relations

Abstract

Despite being the prevailing emotion of our times, anxiety has received scant attention in the international relations discipline. While political theorists and philosophers have long paid attention to anxiety as distinct from and constitutive of fear, international relations theory has assumed that much of international behavior is guided by fears of specific threats to state survival. However, today, the uncertainties surrounding the future of the world order, unanticipated crises like the COVID-19 pandemic that radically change our lives, unforeseeable terrorist attacks, and the unexplainable lure of radical fundamentalist ideologies all evoke a pervasive anxiety about what we do not know and what we cannot control, rather than the fear of a specific and known enemy.

🔖

Cite This Article

RUMELİLİ, B. (2022). Introduction to the Special Issue Anxiety and Change in International Relations. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 73, 1–11. https://ajindex.com/articles/406062

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abulof, Uriel (2015). The Mortality and Morality of Nations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  2. Adisonmez, Umut Can (2019). “When Conflict Traumas Fragment: Investigating the Socio-psychological Roots of Turkey’s Intractable Conflict”, Political Psychology, Vol. 40, No 6, p. 1373-1390.
  3. Adisonmez, Umut Can and Recep Onursal (2020). “Governing Anxiety, Trauma and Crisis: The Political Discourse on Ontological (In)Security after the July 15 Coup Attempt in Turkey”, Middle East Critique, Vol. 29, No 3, p. 291-306.
  4. Agius, Christine, Annika Bergman Rosamond and Catarina Kinnvall (2020). “Populism, Ontological Insecurity and Gendered Nationalism: Masculinity, Climate Denial and Covid-19”, Politics, Religion & Ideology, Vol. 21, No 4, p. 432-450.
  5. Berenskoetter, Felix (2020). “Anxiety, Time, and Agency”, International Theory, Vol. 12, No 2, p. 273-290.
  6. Browning, Christopher S. (2018). “Brexit, Existential Anxiety and Ontological (In)security”, European Security, Vol. 27, No 3, p. 336-355.
  7. Browning, Christopher S. (2018). “‘Je suis en terrasse’: Political Violence, Civilizational Politics, and the Everyday Courage to Be”, Political Psychology, Vol. 39, p. 243-261.
  8. Browning, Christopher S., Pertti Joenniemi (2017). “Ontological Security, Self-articulation and the Securitization of Identity”, Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 52, No 1, p. 31-47.
  9. Campbell, David (1992). Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
  10. Cash, John (2020). “Psychoanalysis, Cultures of Anarchy, and Ontological Insecurity”, International Theory, Vol. 12, No 2, p. 306-321.
  11. Chernobrov, Dmitry (2019). Public Perception of International Crises: Identity, Ontological Security, and Self-Affirmation. London, Rowman & Littlefield. Eberle, Jakub (2019). “Narrative, Desire, Ontological Security, Transgression: Fantasy as a Factor in International Politics”, Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol. 22, p. 243-268.
  12. Ejdus, Filip (2020). Crisis and Ontological Insecurity: Serbia’s Anxiety Over Kosovo’s Secession. Cham, Palgrave Macmillan. Eklundh, Emmy, Andreja Zevnik and Emmanuel-Pierre Guittet (eds.) (2017).
  13. Politics of Anxiety. London, Rowman & Littlefield. George, Jim and David Campbell (1990). “Patterns of Dissent and the Celebration of Difference: Critical Social Theory and International Relations,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 34, No 3, pp. 269-293.
  14. Giddens, Anthony (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity